Volatility is critical to risk measurement. Generally, volatility refers to standard deviation, which is a dispersion measure. Greater dispersion implies greater risk, which implies higher odds of price erosion or portfolio loss  this is key information for any investor. Volatility can be used on its own, as in "the hedge fund portfolio exhibited a monthly volatility of 5%," but the term is also used in conjunction with return measures, as, for example, in the denominator of the Sharpe ratio. Volatility is also a key input in parametric value at risk (VAR), where portfolio exposure is a function of volatility. In this article, we'll show you how calculate historical volatility to determine the future risk of your investments. (For more insight, read The Uses And Limits Of Volatility.)
Tutorial: Option Volatility
Volatility is easily the most common risk measure, despite its imperfections, which include the fact that upside price movements are considered just as "risky" as downside movements. We often estimate future volatility by looking at historical volatility. To calculate historical volatility, we need to take two steps:
1. Compute a series of periodic returns (e.g. daily returns)
2. Choose a weighting scheme (e.g. unweighted scheme)
A daily periodic stock return (denoted below as u_{i}) is the return from yesterday to today. Note that if there was a dividend, we would add it to today's stock price. The following formula is used to calculate this percentage:
In regard to stock prices, however, this simple percentage change is not as helpful as the continuously compounded return. The reason for this is that we can't reliably add together the simple percentage change numbers over multiple periods, but the continuously compounded return can be scaled over a longer time frame. This is technically called being "time consistent." For stock price volatility, therefore, it is preferable to compute the continuously compounded return by using the following formula:
In the example below, we pulled a sample of Google's (NYSE:GOOG) daily closing stock prices. The stock closed at $373.36 on August 25, 2006; the prior day's close was $373.73. The continuous periodic return is therefore 0.126%, which equals the natural log (ln) of the ratio [373.26 / 373.73].
Next, we move to the second step: selecting the weighting scheme. This includes a decision on the length (or size) of our historical sample. Do we want to measure daily volatility over the last (trailing) 30 days, 360 days, or perhaps three years?
In our example, we will choose an unweighted 30day average. In other words, we are estimating average daily volatility over the last 30 days. This is calculated with the help of the formula for sample variance:
We can tell this is a formula for a sample variance because the summation is divided by (m1) instead of (m). You might expect an (m) in the denominator because that would effectively average the series. If it were an (m), this would produce the population variance. Population variance claims to have all of the data points in the entire population, but when it comes to measuring volatility, we never believe that. Any historical sample is merely a subset of a larger "unknown" population. So technically, we should use the sample variance, which uses (m1) in the denominator and produces an "unbiased estimate", to create a slightly higher variance to capture our uncertainty.
Our sample is a 30day snapshot drawn from a larger unknown (and perhaps unknowable) population. If we open MS Excel, select the thirty day range of periodic returns (i.e., the series: 0.126%, 0.080%, 1.293% and so on for thirty days), and apply the function =VARA(), we are executing the formula above. In Google's case, we get about 0.0198%. This number represents the sample daily variance over a 30day period. We take the square root of the variance to get the standard deviation. In Google's case, the square root of 0.0198% is about 1.4068%  Google's historical daily volatility.
It's OK to make two simplifying assumptions about the variance formula above. First, we could assume that the average daily return is close enough to zero that we can treat it as such. That simplifies the summation to a sum of squared returns. Second, we can replace (m1) with (m). This replaces the "unbiased estimator" with a "maximum likelihood estimate".
This simplifies the above to the following equation:
Again, these are easeofuse simplifications often made by professionals in practice. If the periods are short enough (e.g., daily returns), this formula is an acceptable alternative. In other words, the above formula is straightforward: the variance is the average of the squared returns. In the Google series above, this formula produces a variance that is virtually identical (+0.0198%). As before, don't forget to take the square root of the variance to get the volatility.
The reason this is an unweighted scheme is that we averaged each daily return in the 30day series: each day contributes an equal weight toward the average. This is common but not particularly accurate. In practice, we often want to give more weight to more recent variances and/or returns. More advanced schemes, therefore, include weighting schemes (e.g., the GARCH model, exponentially weighted moving average) that assign greater weights to more recent data
Conclusion
Because finding the future risk of an instrument or portfolio can be difficult, we often measure historical volatility and assume that "past is prologue". Historical volatility is standard deviation, as in "the stock's annualized standard deviation was 12%". We compute this by taking a sample of returns, such as 30 days, 252 trading days (in a year), three years or even 10 years. In selecting a sample size we face a classic tradeoff between the recent and the robust: we want more data but to get it, we need to go back farther in time, which may lead to the collection of data that may be irrelevant to the future. In other words, historical volatility does not provide a perfect measure, but it can help you get a better sense of the risk profile of your investments.
Check out David Harper's movie tutorial, Historical Volatility  Simple, Unweighted Average, to learn more on this topic.

Mutual Funds & ETFs
Top 3 Muni California Mutual Funds
Discover analyses of the top three California municipal bond mutual funds, and learn about their characteristics, historical performance and suitability. 
Investing Basics
What Does In Specie Mean?
In specie describes the distribution of an asset in its physical form instead of cash. 
Economics
Calculating Cross Elasticity of Demand
Cross elasticity of demand measures the quantity demanded of one good in response to a change in price of another. 
Fundamental Analysis
Emerging Markets: Analyzing Colombia's GDP
With a backdrop of armed rebels and drug cartels, the journey for the Colombian economy has been anything but easy. 
Investing
What is Descriptive Statistics?
Descriptive statistics is the term applied to meaningful data analysis. 
Fundamental Analysis
Create a Monte Carlo Simulation Using Excel
How to apply the Monte Carlo Simulation principles to a game of dice using Microsoft Excel. 
Fundamental Analysis
Emerging Markets: Analyzing Chile's GDP
Chile has become one of the great economic success stories of Latin America. 
Mutual Funds & ETFs
Top 4 Inverse Equities ETFs
Explore analysis of some of the most popular inverse and leveragedinverse ETFs that track equity indexes, and learn about the suitability of these ETFs. 
Investing
Watch Your Duration When Rates Rise
While recent market volatility is leading investors to look for the nearest exit, here are some suggestions for bond exposure in attractive sectors. 
Economics
Explaining Capital Flows
The movement of money for investing, trade or business production, is commonly referred to as capital flows.

How does the risk of investing in the metals and mining sector compare to the broader ...
The metals and mining sector faces specific investment risks, such as highly capital intensive projects, regulatory changes, ... Read Full Answer >> 
Is Colombia an emerging market economy?
Colombia meets the criteria of an emerging market economy. The South American country has a much lower gross domestic product, ... Read Full Answer >> 
What assumptions are made when conducting a ttest?
The common assumptions made when doing a ttest include those regarding the scale of measurement, random sampling, normality ... Read Full Answer >> 
What is the utility function and how is it calculated?
In economics, utility function is an important concept that measures preferences over a set of goods and services. Utility ... Read Full Answer >> 
What are some of the more common types of regressions investors can use?
The most common types of regression an investor can use are linear regressions and multiple linear regressions. Regressions ... Read Full Answer >> 
What types of assets lower portfolio variance?
Assets that have a negative correlation with each other reduce portfolio variance. Variance is one measure of the volatility ... Read Full Answer >>