As the financial markets get more sophisticated and arcane with time, the number of different types of investment schemes proliferates. It was only a few decades ago when someone first pooled together various individual stocks to create the first mutual fund, which was seen at the time as novel and perhaps unduly complicated. From there it was a logical jump to exchange-traded funds, which debuted in Canada in the late 1980s and in the United States shortly thereafter. As individual and institutional investors alike continue to look for incremental advantages, investment firms meet demand by offering vehicles that are necessarily more complex than their predecessors. Hence strategic beta ETFs, which do something beyond mindlessly tracking an underlying index. Today, strategic beta ETFs represent some of the most dynamic and potentially lucrative investments available to the ordinary investor.

First, for the unfamiliar, a quick explanation on beta (ß). It’s a measure of risk, specifically of the difference between a security’s return and that of a benchmark. For most garden-variety funds, the benchmark is the market as a whole, represented by the Standard & Poor’s 500. The argument for calculating ß is that a fund manager worth his salary ought to be able to beat a broad index comprised of nothing less prominent than the stocks of the 500 largest publicly traded companies.

ß is the movement in the security’s price, in terms of any movement in the benchmark. If the benchmark were to rise 1% while the security in question rises 2%, that’s a beta of 2. Cash and treasury bonds, whose movements have no correlation to any benchmark movements, have a beta of 0.

Strategic Beta ETF Composition

The default setting for an ETF, a non-strategic beta ETF, is to be tied to an index whose components are weighted by market capitalization. What that means is, say you have a simple index that tracks just two stocks - let’s go with Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM), the two largest corporations on earth, with market capitalizations of $467 billion and $413 billion respectively. Weighed by market cap, a fund that tracks that index would be invested 53% in Apple, 47% in ExxonMobil. At least until the next trading day, when the relative sizes of the components change and the numbers have to be recalculated. Of course, a typical ETF contains not two, but hundreds or thousands of components.

A strategic (or “smart”) beta ETF, on the other hand, has its components weighted by some other criteria. That could be the aforementioned measure of volatility, dividend payout, cash flow, book value, or even secondary technical metrics. Essentially, strategic beta ETFs represent something of a middle ground between active and passive portfolio management.

Large investment firms commonly categorize their strategic beta funds by particular factors: these include momentum (how quickly an issue’s price, or its volume traded, is accelerating); beta (as a metric, the one defined above, either high or low); “quality” (defined as some combination of growth and stability); and finally, buyback strength. With regard to that last one, the argument goes that the more of its stock a company buys back on the open market, the more desirable the stock becomes for the remaining investors. Subcategories of each of the preceding strategic beta ETF families are organized in a similar fashion to other ETFs, including small-, mid- and large cap; emerging and developed markets; domestic and international, etc., along with categorization by industry sector, commodity, and so on.

A general, all-purpose ETF is necessarily broader and more representative of the market than is a strategic beta ETF. For instance, here are the top 10 components of the largest ETF in existence, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSE:SPY):

Apple (Nasdaq:AAPL)


Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM)


Google (Nasdaq:GOOG)


Microsoft (Nasdaq:MSFT)


Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ)


General Electric (NYSE:GE)


Chevron (NYSE:CVX)


Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC)


JP Morgan (NYSE:JPM)


Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG)


Those are the 10 largest companies available for inclusion, or a close approximation thereof. Contrast that with the holdings of a strategic beta ETF, the PowerShares S&P 500 High Quality portfolio fund (NYSEArca: SPHQ):

L-3 Communications (NYSE:LLL)


Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT)


Walt Disney (NYSE:DIS)


Stryker (NYSE:SYK)


Omnicom (NYSE:OMC)


CVS Caremark (NYSE:CVS)


Sigma-Aldrich (Nasdaq:SIAL)


United Technologies (NYSE:UTX)


Hormel (NYSE:HRL)


Baxter (NYSE:BAX)


These companies are dwarfed by the SPDR S&P 500 ETF components, but they aren’t small caps by any stretch. Every one of them is at least a $10 billion company, although few of them are household names. L-3 Communications is an aerospace firm that makes everything from flight simulators to airport baggage scanners. Caterpillar and Walt Disney, you’re probably familiar with. Stryker makes medical devices, ranging from stretchers to artificial hips. Omnicom is one of America’s two largest advertising firms. CVS Caremark owns and operates drugstores. Sigma-Aldrich makes lab chemicals. United Technologies is one of the last true conglomerates, making air conditioning systems, rocket engines, security alarms and more. Hormel serves up Spam®, the edible kind. And Baxter manufactures vaccines and dialysis equipment.

Are there disadvantages to strategic beta ETFs? Yes, just as there are for any investment. Diversity isn’t quite as great as it is for standard market-tracking ETFs. Portfolio turnover is by necessity higher for a strategic beta ETF, and higher turnover could mean higher management fees. Sadly, the perfect investment that combines zero risk and guaranteed enormous returns continues to not exist. Strategic beta ETFs just provide a new series of advantages and disadvantages for the wise investor to assess before making a decision.

The Bottom Line

Creating a strategic beta ETFs requires more ingenuity than does assembling a standard index-matching ETF. The extra work seems to be paying off for the firms - money flowing into strategic beta ETFs almost doubled over the past year. For the investor impatient or dissatisfied with ordinary market returns, strategic beta ETFs offer a legitimate alternative. There’s almost certainly one that meets any investor’s capacity for risk tolerance, appreciation potential and more.

Related Articles
  1. Investing News

    Building A Better Mousetrap With Smart Beta ETFs

    More smart beta and altermative indexed funds are coming to brokerage account near you. But what exactly are these funds and how can use them in a portfolio?
  2. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Introduction to Leveraged ETFs

    Leveraged exchange-traded funds have appeared that are designed to move either conversely or inversely to their underlying benchmark, which may be either a financial index or a specific segment ...
  3. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Top ETFs And What They Track: A Tutorial

    This Investopedia tutorial provides an introduction to the leading exchange-traded funds by assets under management, broken down by market category.
  4. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    What Are Factor Model ETFs?

    Given that stock picking is not generally effective, trackers that simply follow an index have become very popular. However, trackers have their disadvantages, too, so hybrid models between the ...
  5. Professionals

    5 Top-Rated Funds for Your Retirement Portfolio

    Mutual funds are a good choice for emotional investors. Here are five popular funds to consider.
  6. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    The 4 Best Buy-and-Hold ETFs

    Explore detailed analyses of the top buy-and-hold exchange traded funds, and learn about their characteristics, statistics and suitability.
  7. Chart Advisor

    Bumpy Roads Ahead In Transportation

    Investors are keeping an eye on the transportation industry. We'll take a look at the trend direction and how to trade it.
  8. Investing

    How ETFs May Save You Thousands

    Being vigilant about the amount you pay and what you get for is important, but adding ETFs into the investment mix fits well with a value-seeking nature.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    3 Fixed Income ETFs in the Mining Sector

    Learn about the top three metals and mining exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and explore analyses of their characteristics and how investors can benefit from these ETFs.
  10. Chart Advisor

    Agriculture Commodities Are In The Bear's Sights

    Agriculture stocks have experienced strong moves higher over recent weeks, but chart patterns on sugar, corn and wheat are suggesting the moves could be short lived.
  1. Can mutual funds invest in IPOs?

    Mutual funds can invest in initial public offerings (IPOS). However, most mutual funds have bylaws that prevent them from ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Does index trading increase market vulnerability?

    The rise of index trading may increase the overall vulnerability of the stock market due to increased correlations between ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What does a high turnover ratio signify for an investment fund?

    If an investment fund has a high turnover ratio, it indicates it replaces most or all of its holdings over a one-year period. ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. What is the difference between passive and active asset management?

    Asset management utilizes two main investment strategies that can be used to generate returns: active asset management and ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Is there a situation in which wash trading is legal?

    Wash trading, the intentional practice of manipulating a stock's activity level to deceive other investors, is not a legal ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Are there leveraged ETFs that follow the retail sector?

    There are many exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track the retail sector or elements of the retail sector, and some of those ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!