As the financial markets get more sophisticated and arcane with time, the number of different types of investment schemes proliferates. It was only a few decades ago when someone first pooled together various individual stocks to create the first mutual fund, which was seen at the time as novel and perhaps unduly complicated. From there it was a logical jump to exchange-traded funds, which debuted in Canada in the late 1980s and in the United States shortly thereafter. As individual and institutional investors alike continue to look for incremental advantages, investment firms meet demand by offering vehicles that are necessarily more complex than their predecessors. Hence strategic beta ETFs, which do something beyond mindlessly tracking an underlying index. Today, strategic beta ETFs represent some of the most dynamic and potentially lucrative investments available to the ordinary investor.

First, for the unfamiliar, a quick explanation on beta (ß). It’s a measure of risk, specifically of the difference between a security’s return and that of a benchmark. For most garden-variety funds, the benchmark is the market as a whole, represented by the Standard & Poor’s 500. The argument for calculating ß is that a fund manager worth his salary ought to be able to beat a broad index comprised of nothing less prominent than the stocks of the 500 largest publicly traded companies.

ß is the movement in the security’s price, in terms of any movement in the benchmark. If the benchmark were to rise 1% while the security in question rises 2%, that’s a beta of 2. Cash and treasury bonds, whose movements have no correlation to any benchmark movements, have a beta of 0.

Strategic Beta ETF Composition

The default setting for an ETF, a non-strategic beta ETF, is to be tied to an index whose components are weighted by market capitalization. What that means is, say you have a simple index that tracks just two stocks - let’s go with Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM), the two largest corporations on earth, with market capitalizations of $467 billion and $413 billion respectively. Weighed by market cap, a fund that tracks that index would be invested 53% in Apple, 47% in ExxonMobil. At least until the next trading day, when the relative sizes of the components change and the numbers have to be recalculated. Of course, a typical ETF contains not two, but hundreds or thousands of components.

A strategic (or “smart”) beta ETF, on the other hand, has its components weighted by some other criteria. That could be the aforementioned measure of volatility, dividend payout, cash flow, book value, or even secondary technical metrics. Essentially, strategic beta ETFs represent something of a middle ground between active and passive portfolio management.

Large investment firms commonly categorize their strategic beta funds by particular factors: these include momentum (how quickly an issue’s price, or its volume traded, is accelerating); beta (as a metric, the one defined above, either high or low); “quality” (defined as some combination of growth and stability); and finally, buyback strength. With regard to that last one, the argument goes that the more of its stock a company buys back on the open market, the more desirable the stock becomes for the remaining investors. Subcategories of each of the preceding strategic beta ETF families are organized in a similar fashion to other ETFs, including small-, mid- and large cap; emerging and developed markets; domestic and international, etc., along with categorization by industry sector, commodity, and so on.

A general, all-purpose ETF is necessarily broader and more representative of the market than is a strategic beta ETF. For instance, here are the top 10 components of the largest ETF in existence, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSE:SPY):

Apple (Nasdaq:AAPL)


Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM)


Google (Nasdaq:GOOG)


Microsoft (Nasdaq:MSFT)


Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ)


General Electric (NYSE:GE)


Chevron (NYSE:CVX)


Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC)


JP Morgan (NYSE:JPM)


Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG)


Those are the 10 largest companies available for inclusion, or a close approximation thereof. Contrast that with the holdings of a strategic beta ETF, the PowerShares S&P 500 High Quality portfolio fund (NYSEArca: SPHQ):

L-3 Communications (NYSE:LLL)


Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT)


Walt Disney (NYSE:DIS)


Stryker (NYSE:SYK)


Omnicom (NYSE:OMC)


CVS Caremark (NYSE:CVS)


Sigma-Aldrich (Nasdaq:SIAL)


United Technologies (NYSE:UTX)


Hormel (NYSE:HRL)


Baxter (NYSE:BAX)


These companies are dwarfed by the SPDR S&P 500 ETF components, but they aren’t small caps by any stretch. Every one of them is at least a $10 billion company, although few of them are household names. L-3 Communications is an aerospace firm that makes everything from flight simulators to airport baggage scanners. Caterpillar and Walt Disney, you’re probably familiar with. Stryker makes medical devices, ranging from stretchers to artificial hips. Omnicom is one of America’s two largest advertising firms. CVS Caremark owns and operates drugstores. Sigma-Aldrich makes lab chemicals. United Technologies is one of the last true conglomerates, making air conditioning systems, rocket engines, security alarms and more. Hormel serves up Spam®, the edible kind. And Baxter manufactures vaccines and dialysis equipment.

Are there disadvantages to strategic beta ETFs? Yes, just as there are for any investment. Diversity isn’t quite as great as it is for standard market-tracking ETFs. Portfolio turnover is by necessity higher for a strategic beta ETF, and higher turnover could mean higher management fees. Sadly, the perfect investment that combines zero risk and guaranteed enormous returns continues to not exist. Strategic beta ETFs just provide a new series of advantages and disadvantages for the wise investor to assess before making a decision.

The Bottom Line

Creating a strategic beta ETFs requires more ingenuity than does assembling a standard index-matching ETF. The extra work seems to be paying off for the firms - money flowing into strategic beta ETFs almost doubled over the past year. For the investor impatient or dissatisfied with ordinary market returns, strategic beta ETFs offer a legitimate alternative. There’s almost certainly one that meets any investor’s capacity for risk tolerance, appreciation potential and more.

Related Articles
  1. Investing News

    Building A Better Mousetrap With Smart Beta ETFs

    More smart beta and altermative indexed funds are coming to brokerage account near you. But what exactly are these funds and how can use them in a portfolio?
  2. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Introduction to Leveraged ETFs

    Leveraged exchange-traded funds have appeared that are designed to move either conversely or inversely to their underlying benchmark, which may be either a financial index or a specific segment ...
  3. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Top ETFs And What They Track: A Tutorial

    This Investopedia tutorial provides an introduction to the leading exchange-traded funds by assets under management, broken down by market category.
  4. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    What Are Factor Model ETFs?

    Given that stock picking is not generally effective, trackers that simply follow an index have become very popular. However, trackers have their disadvantages, too, so hybrid models between the ...
  5. Chart Advisor

    Now Could Be The Time To Buy IPOs

    There has been lots of hype around the IPO market lately. We'll take a look at whether now is the time to buy.
  6. Chart Advisor

    Copper Continues Its Descent

    Copper prices have been under pressure lately and based on these charts it doesn't seem that it will reverse any time soon.
  7. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Buying Vanguard Mutual Funds Vs. ETFs

    Learn about the differences between Vanguard's mutual fund and ETF products, and discover which may be more appropriate for investors.
  8. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETFs Vs. Mutual Funds: Choosing For Your Retirement

    Learn about the difference between using mutual funds versus ETFs for retirement, including which investment strategies and goals are best served by each.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    How to Reinvest Dividends from ETFs

    Learn about reinvesting ETF dividends, including the benefits and drawbacks of dividend reinvestment plans (DRIPs) and manual reinvestment.
  10. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Best 3 Vanguard Funds that Track the Top 500 Companies

    Discover the three Vanguard funds tracking the S&P 500 Index, and learn about the characteristics and historical statistics of these funds.
  1. Should mutual funds be subject to more regulation?

    Mutual funds, when compared to other types of pooled investments such as hedge funds, have very strict regulations. In fact, ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Do ETFs pay capital gains?

    Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) can generate capital gains that are transferred to shareholders, typically once a year, triggering ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How do real estate hedge funds work?

    A hedge fund is a type of investment vehicle and business structure that aggregates capital from multiple investors and invests ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Are Vanguard ETFs commission-free?

    While some Vanguard exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are available commission-free from third-party brokers, a large portion ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Do Vanguard ETFs require a minimum investment?

    Vanguard completely waives any U.S. dollar minimum amounts to buy its exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and the minimum ETF investment ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Can mutual fund expense ratios be negative?

    Mutual fund expense ratios cannot be negative. An expense ratio is the sum total of all fees charged by an asset management ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center