In the article Analyzing Pension Risk I define pension risk and explain why it is important to assess this risk posed by a company's defined benefit pension plan. Here in this article I present one way (but not the only way) that can help you evaluate and assess whether or not a company's pension exhibits a high risk of shortfall.

Analyzing a company's pension risk should be as easy as reading the footnotes to compare what is owed (accumulated benefits due employees) to what is owned (the value of the portfolio). Unfortunately, thanks to complicated accounting and IRS rules, evaluating pension risk is a Gordian knot that is not easily unraveled.

However, there is a way to use information in the footnotes to evaluate pension risk. While it involves some work, this process will make you a more informed investor. The goal of this process is to cut through the accounting mumbo jumbo to estimate pension funding and cash risk.

The Process
In General Electric's (NYSE: GE) 2002 annual report, Footnote 6 contains the pension data we need. Under the "effect on operations" section it is disclosed that GE's pension plan contributed $1.556 billion to pre-tax income (before payments for retiree healthcare and other benefits), or $0.12 per share on an after-tax basis.

However, this amount was arrived at after using the smoothing techniques allowed by generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The table in Footnote 6 (shown in Table 1 below) shows that the $1.556 billion was the result of the expected return of $4.08 billion, the real costs and smoothing accounting techniques. It is these real costs that will be used to analyze the real cost of GE's pension plan.

analyst_081303_1.gif

In order to gauge the impact of "core" pension expenses on EPS, you need to examine the real annual costs of a pension plan, namely service and interest costs. The service costs represent the pension benefits earned by the employees during that year, and in GE's case, that number is the net of employee contributions. The interest cost represents the interest that accrued on the unfunded part of the projected benefit obligation. Analyzing the impact of these costs in relative isolation helps analyze the impact of pension liabilities without the smoothing allowed by GAAP.

To determine the "real" annual cost of the pension plan, you need to back out the massaged number (in this case the $1.556 billion) and add back the service and interest cost. The real annual, after-tax, per share cost of the pension plan in 2002 is $0.38.

As shown in Table 2, this calculation increases the cost 16.7% in 2001 and 6.1% in 2002. This represents a total "swing" of $0.50 from the GAAP EPS number. GE is unique because its plan contributed income whereas most plans add expense. Generally, when evaluating pension risk plans adding expense, you would add the periodic pension cost and subtract the service and interest costs to get the net effect on EPS, but in GE's case, you subtract everything:
analyst_081303_2.gif

This adjustment reduces GE's EPS growth rate by 38%. As shown in Table 3, the GAAP EPS growth rate for 2002 was 2.9% versus the 1.8% that results from making the adjustments described above.

analyst_081303_3.gif

What about Periodic Investment Gains?
This process does not factor in the return on plan assets for two main reasons. First, the above process focuses on the actual annual costs in order to gauge their impact on earnings. Second, the return on plan assets does not belong to the company but to the retirees. While an accounting convention may allow a company to net the costs against the returns, the company has no legal right to the returns. Factoring the return on plan assets into the process would distort the analysis.

If you wanted to include the return on plan assets, you would need to look at the disclosure of the Fair Value of Plan Assets. In GE's case, the actual loss on plan assets was $5.25 billion (compared to the $4.1 billion return that was expected). Including the actual loss on plan assets would reduce EPS by another $0.42 (after taxes).

The Bottom Line
This approach analyzes the EPS impact of the hard (or undiluted by accounting practices) cost of defined pension plans on EPS. Focusing on the per share impact of annual service and interest costs provides a clear view of annual costs that is unclouded by the actuarial assumptions and smoothing techniques allowed by GAAP.

Related Articles
  1. Retirement

    Early Out: A Realistic Plan to Retire Younger

    If you want to retire ahead of schedule, it'll take some extra planning.
  2. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Which Fund Share Class is Best for Retirement?

    Mutual funds are a popular investment for retirement. Here's how to choose the best share class when investing in them.
  3. Retirement

    6 Robo-Advisors That Require Little to Start

    There are many well-regarded robo-advisor options that come with minimum investment amounts. Here are snapshots of a handful of them.
  4. Your Clients

    How to Construct an Annual Review for Clients

    One of the best things that advisors can provide to clients is an annual review of their financial situation. Here are some guidelines.
  5. Retirement

    Roth IRAs Tutorial

    This comprehensive guide goes through what a Roth IRA is and how to set one up, contribute to it and withdraw from it.
  6. Retirement

    Retirees: How to Survive When Interest Rates Drop

    Low interest rates are a portfolio killer if you're living off of investment income. Some strategies for dealing.
  7. Term

    How Traditional IRAs Work

    A traditional IRA is a tax-advantaged retirement account that includes stocks, bonds, mutual funds and other investments.
  8. Retirement

    5 Reasons Millennials Lead in Saving for Retirement

    Say what you want to about millennials but the one thing they are doing better than any other generation is saving for retirement. Here's why.
  9. Retirement

    How Much Should You Have In Your 401(k) To Retire?

    Determining how much money should be in your 401(k) when you retire depends on several variables, many of which are uncertain.
  10. Economics

    Understanding Cost-Volume Profit Analysis

    Business managers use cost-volume profit analysis to gauge the profitability of their company’s products or services.
RELATED FAQS
  1. Am I losing the right to collect spousal Social Security benefits before I collect ...

    The short answer is yes, if you haven't reached age 62 by December 31, 2015. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 disrupted ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Where else can I save for retirement after I max out my Roth IRA?

    With uncertainty about the sustainability of Social Security benefits for future retirees, a lot of responsibility for saving ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. When can catch-up contributions start?

    Most qualified retirement plans such as 401(k), 403(b) and SIMPLE 401(k) plans, as well as individual retirement accounts ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Are 401(k) contributions tax deductible?

    All contributions to qualified retirement plans such as 401(k)s reduce taxable income, which lowers the total taxes owed. ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Are 401(k) rollovers taxable?

    401(k) rollovers are generally not taxable as long as the money goes into another qualifying plan, an individual retirement ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Are catch-up contributions included in the 415 limit?

    Unlike regular employee deferrals, catch-up contributions are not included in the 415 limit. While there is an annual limit ... Read Full Answer >>
Hot Definitions
  1. Black Swan

    An event or occurrence that deviates beyond what is normally expected of a situation and that would be extremely difficult ...
  2. Inverted Yield Curve

    An interest rate environment in which long-term debt instruments have a lower yield than short-term debt instruments of the ...
  3. Socially Responsible Investment - SRI

    An investment that is considered socially responsible because of the nature of the business the company conducts. Common ...
  4. Presidential Election Cycle (Theory)

    A theory developed by Yale Hirsch that states that U.S. stock markets are weakest in the year following the election of a ...
  5. Super Bowl Indicator

    An indicator based on the belief that a Super Bowl win for a team from the old AFL (AFC division) foretells a decline in ...
Trading Center