The Great Wall of China was constructed to protect the people of China from invaders. That Chinese wall concept of separation also came into investing in 1929, when the separation of investment banking from brokerage operations was embraced by the securities industry regulators. This was spurred by the stock market crash that occurred the same year, and eventually served as a catalyst for the creation of new legislation.

Rather than forcing companies to participate in either the business of providing research or providing investment banking services, the Chinese wall attempted to create an environment in which a single company could engage in both endeavors. This wall was not a physical boundary, but rather an ethical one that financial institutions were expected to observe. The effort went unquestioned for decades until the scandal-plagued '90s brought it back into the spotlight. In this article, we'll take you through some historic examples to show why a Chinese wall is needed and why legislation was created to keep it in place.

Conflicts of Interest
The deregulation of brokerage commissions in 1975 served as a catalyst for the increased concern about conflicts of interest. This change abolished the fixed-rate minimum commission on security trades, causing profits to plummet at brokerage operations. This became a major problem for sell-side analysts, who conduct securities research and make the information available to the public. Buy-side analysts, on the other hand, work for mutual fund companies and other organizations. Their research is used to guide investment decisions made by the firms that employ them.

Once the pricing changed on brokerage commissions, sell-side analysts were encouraged to craft reports that helped sell stocks, and were given financial incentives when their reports promoted their firm's initial public offerings (IPOs). Large year-end bonuses were based on such successes. This created the potential for a conflict of interest.

The Bustling Dotcom Boom
The Chinese wall model also came to the public's attention during the heyday of the dotcom era, when superstar analysts such as Morgan Stanley's Mark Meeker and Salomon Smith Barney's Jack Grubman became household names for their avid promotion of specific securities and lavish paychecks. Investors followed the advice that these analysts provided, believing that they were receiving unbiased advice. At this time, a few words from a top analyst could literally cause a stock's price to soar or plummet as investors bought and sold based on the "recommendations" of the analysts.

(To read more on behavioral finance, see Taking A Chance On Behavioral Finance, Understanding Investor Behavior and Mad Money ... Mad Market?)

The collapse of the dotcom era shed some light on the flaws in this system. Regulators took notice when it was discovered that big-name analysts were privately selling personal holdings of the stocks they were promoting and had been pressured into providing good ratings (despite personal opinions and research that indicated the stocks were not good buys). Regulators also discovered that many of these analysts personally owned pre-IPO shares of the securities and stood to earn massive personal profits if they were successful, gave "hot" tips to institutional clients and favored certain clients, enabling them to make enormous profits off of unsuspecting members of the public.

Investors who were buying securities on the advice of their favorite analysts lost significant amounts of money, while the analysts and their cronies were selling those very same securities. This is very similar to your average pump-and-dump scheme. (To learn more about investment scams, see The Short And Distort - Stock Manipulation In A Bear Market, Spotting Sharks Among Penny Stocks and Online Investment Scams Tutorial.)

Policing the Industry
Regulatory investigations into the practice of sell-side analysts and their employers revealed some interesting issues. While many analysts owned pre-IPO stocks and relied on the success of the IPO for personal gain, there were no laws against such practices. Weak disclosure requirements enabled the practice to flourish. Likewise, it was discovered that few analysts ever put a "sell" rating on any of the companies they covered. Encouraging investors to sell a specific security didn't sit well the investment bankers because such a rating would discourage the poorly-rated company from doing business with the bank.

The United States Congress (who created the Securities And Exchange Commission (SEC), the overarching regulator of the securities market), the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) all became involved in the effort to craft new regulations for the industry. Today, there are additional protections in place, such as prohibitions on linking analyst compensation to the success of a particular IPO, restrictions on providing information to some clients and not others, rules against analysts conducting personal trades in securities that they cover, and additional disclosure requirements designed to protect investors. (To find out more about current regulations, read Fee-Based Brokerage: The Latest Target For Regulators, Policing The Securities Market: An Overview Of The SEC and Reg AC: What Does It Mean To Investors?)

Where do we go from here?
While the new legal protections are a good start, smart investors should look beyond the laws and learn a few lessons from the past. Beyond the legalities, the rise and fall of the dotcom era and the accompanying scandals revealed some ugly truths about ethics and greed that no amount of legislation can rectify or erase. The firms and their analysts were vilified for promoting companies that had no profits and no prospects, and they were certainly guilty as charged, but the investors themselves were also guilty of failings of their own.

Rather than taking the time and effort to conduct a bit of research on their own, they used their money to chase "hot" stocks, guided by greed instead of common sense. Naysayers, such as Warren Buffett, were dismissed as being out of touch with the economic realities of the "new" economy. Tried-and-true investment practices such as the principles of valuation and profitability were cast aside for a chance to irrationally join a hunt as stock prices were chased upward by a blind influx of money. In the end, the greater fool theory held true. It's a sobering lesson and one that just might save your fortune the next time market madness prevails.

To read more on this subject, see How To Work Around A Market Maker's Tricks and Brokers and Online Trading.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Is the Stock Market Crashing? 5 Signs to Consider

    Learn about some signs of a potential stock market crash including a high level of margin debt, lots of IPOs, M&A activity and technical factors.
  2. Professionals

    Career Advice: Financial Planner Vs. Wealth Manager

    Understand the differences between a career in financial planning and wealth management, and identify which is better for you based on your goals and talents.
  3. Investing

    Procter & Gamble Restructures, Sheds 100 Brands

    All businesses face adversity, and Procter & Gamble is no exception. We take a look at recent developments affecting this global giant.
  4. Professionals

    4 Ways Companies Can Relieve Workplace Stress

    Workplace stress can cost companies tons of money in lost productivity and absenteeism. Some of that is out of their control, but often they are the cause.
  5. Professionals

    Career Advice: Accountant Vs. Financial Planner

    Identify the key differences between a career in accounting and financial planning, and learn how your personality dictates which is the better choice for you.
  6. Investing News

    Ferrari’s IPO: Ready to Roll or Poor Timing?

    Will Ferrari's shares move fast off the line only to sputter later?
  7. Investing Basics

    What Does Plain Vanilla Mean?

    Plain vanilla is a term used in investing to describe the most basic types of financial instruments.
  8. Investing Basics

    What Does In Specie Mean?

    In specie describes the distribution of an asset in its physical form instead of cash.
  9. Economics

    Calculating Cross Elasticity of Demand

    Cross elasticity of demand measures the quantity demanded of one good in response to a change in price of another.
  10. Investing Basics

    3 Key Signs Of A Market Top

    When stocks rise or fall, the financial fate of investors change, as well. There are certain signs that can reveal a stock’s course, and investors don’t need to be experts to spot them.
  1. Do financial advisors have to find their own clients?

    Nearly all financial advisors, particularly when new to the field, have to find their own clients. An employer may provide ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Do financial advisors get drug tested?

    Financial advisors are not drug tested by any federal or state regulatory body. This means you may receive your Series 6, ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Is a financial advisor required to have a degree?

    Financial advisors are not required to have university degrees. However, they are required to pass certain exams administered ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Do financial advisors have to be licensed?

    Financial advisors must possess various securities licenses in order to sell investment products. The specific products an ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Do financial advisors need to meet quotas?

    Most financial advisors are required to meet quotas, particularly if they work for firms that pay base salaries or draws ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. How do mutual funds split?

    Mutual funds split in the same way that individual stocks split, but less often. Like a stock split, mutual fund splits do ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Hot Definitions
  1. Term Deposit

    A deposit held at a financial institution that has a fixed term, and guarantees return of principal.
  2. Zero-Sum Game

    A situation in which one person’s gain is equivalent to another’s loss, so that the net change in wealth or benefit is zero. ...
  3. Capitalization Rate

    The rate of return on a real estate investment property based on the income that the property is expected to generate.
  4. Gross Profit

    A company's total revenue (equivalent to total sales) minus the cost of goods sold. Gross profit is the profit a company ...
  5. Revenue

    The amount of money that a company actually receives during a specific period, including discounts and deductions for returned ...
  6. Normal Profit

    An economic condition occurring when the difference between a firm’s total revenue and total cost is equal to zero.
Trading Center
You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!