The Great Wall of China was constructed to protect the people of China from invaders. That Chinese wall concept of separation also came into investing in 1929, when the separation of investment banking from brokerage operations was embraced by the securities industry regulators. This was spurred by the stock market crash that occurred the same year, and eventually served as a catalyst for the creation of new legislation.

Rather than forcing companies to participate in either the business of providing research or providing investment banking services, the Chinese wall attempted to create an environment in which a single company could engage in both endeavors. This wall was not a physical boundary, but rather an ethical one that financial institutions were expected to observe. The effort went unquestioned for decades until the scandal-plagued '90s brought it back into the spotlight. In this article, we'll take you through some historic examples to show why a Chinese wall is needed and why legislation was created to keep it in place.

Conflicts of Interest
The deregulation of brokerage commissions in 1975 served as a catalyst for the increased concern about conflicts of interest. This change abolished the fixed-rate minimum commission on security trades, causing profits to plummet at brokerage operations. This became a major problem for sell-side analysts, who conduct securities research and make the information available to the public. Buy-side analysts, on the other hand, work for mutual fund companies and other organizations. Their research is used to guide investment decisions made by the firms that employ them.

Once the pricing changed on brokerage commissions, sell-side analysts were encouraged to craft reports that helped sell stocks, and were given financial incentives when their reports promoted their firm's initial public offerings (IPOs). Large year-end bonuses were based on such successes. This created the potential for a conflict of interest.

The Bustling Dotcom Boom
The Chinese wall model also came to the public's attention during the heyday of the dotcom era, when superstar analysts such as Morgan Stanley's Mark Meeker and Salomon Smith Barney's Jack Grubman became household names for their avid promotion of specific securities and lavish paychecks. Investors followed the advice that these analysts provided, believing that they were receiving unbiased advice. At this time, a few words from a top analyst could literally cause a stock's price to soar or plummet as investors bought and sold based on the "recommendations" of the analysts.

(To read more on behavioral finance, see Taking A Chance On Behavioral Finance, Understanding Investor Behavior and Mad Money ... Mad Market?)

The collapse of the dotcom era shed some light on the flaws in this system. Regulators took notice when it was discovered that big-name analysts were privately selling personal holdings of the stocks they were promoting and had been pressured into providing good ratings (despite personal opinions and research that indicated the stocks were not good buys). Regulators also discovered that many of these analysts personally owned pre-IPO shares of the securities and stood to earn massive personal profits if they were successful, gave "hot" tips to institutional clients and favored certain clients, enabling them to make enormous profits off of unsuspecting members of the public.

Investors who were buying securities on the advice of their favorite analysts lost significant amounts of money, while the analysts and their cronies were selling those very same securities. This is very similar to your average pump-and-dump scheme. (To learn more about investment scams, see The Short And Distort - Stock Manipulation In A Bear Market, Spotting Sharks Among Penny Stocks and Online Investment Scams Tutorial.)

Policing the Industry
Regulatory investigations into the practice of sell-side analysts and their employers revealed some interesting issues. While many analysts owned pre-IPO stocks and relied on the success of the IPO for personal gain, there were no laws against such practices. Weak disclosure requirements enabled the practice to flourish. Likewise, it was discovered that few analysts ever put a "sell" rating on any of the companies they covered. Encouraging investors to sell a specific security didn't sit well the investment bankers because such a rating would discourage the poorly-rated company from doing business with the bank.

The United States Congress (who created the Securities And Exchange Commission (SEC), the overarching regulator of the securities market), the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) all became involved in the effort to craft new regulations for the industry. Today, there are additional protections in place, such as prohibitions on linking analyst compensation to the success of a particular IPO, restrictions on providing information to some clients and not others, rules against analysts conducting personal trades in securities that they cover, and additional disclosure requirements designed to protect investors. (To find out more about current regulations, read Fee-Based Brokerage: The Latest Target For Regulators, Policing The Securities Market: An Overview Of The SEC and Reg AC: What Does It Mean To Investors?)

Where do we go from here?
While the new legal protections are a good start, smart investors should look beyond the laws and learn a few lessons from the past. Beyond the legalities, the rise and fall of the dotcom era and the accompanying scandals revealed some ugly truths about ethics and greed that no amount of legislation can rectify or erase. The firms and their analysts were vilified for promoting companies that had no profits and no prospects, and they were certainly guilty as charged, but the investors themselves were also guilty of failings of their own.

Rather than taking the time and effort to conduct a bit of research on their own, they used their money to chase "hot" stocks, guided by greed instead of common sense. Naysayers, such as Warren Buffett, were dismissed as being out of touch with the economic realities of the "new" economy. Tried-and-true investment practices such as the principles of valuation and profitability were cast aside for a chance to irrationally join a hunt as stock prices were chased upward by a blind influx of money. In the end, the greater fool theory held true. It's a sobering lesson and one that just might save your fortune the next time market madness prevails.

To read more on this subject, see How To Work Around A Market Maker's Tricks and Brokers and Online Trading.

Related Articles
  1. Active Trading

    10 Books Every Investor Should Read

    Want advice from some of the most successful investors of all time? Check out our reading list.
  2. Stock Analysis

    If You Had Invested Right After Disney's IPO

    Discover how the Walt Disney Company has been entertaining people and taking care of its shareholders since debuting on the NYSE in 1957.
  3. Investing

    The Science of Making Better Investment Decisions

    Neuroeconomics attempts to bridge neuroscience, cognitive psychology and economics in order to understand the mechanisms underlying economic decision making.
  4. Stock Analysis

    If You Had Invested Right After Gilead's IPO

    Find out the present day value of your investment in Gilead Sciences and the amount of shares you would own if you had invested during its IPO.
  5. Stock Analysis

    If You Had Invested Right After Costco's IPO

    Find out how much your investment would be worth if you had invested $1,000 during Costco's IPO and how much you would have received in dividends.
  6. Stock Analysis

    If You Had Invested Right After Kraft's IPO

    Discover the complicated history of the Kraft Heinz Company and how much an investment in its initial public offering in 2001 would be worth today.
  7. Stock Analysis

    If You Had Invested Right After Coca-Cola's IPO

    Discover how one $40 share, with dividend reinvestment, over 90 years ago in the Coca-Cola Company would have made you a multimillionaire today.
  8. Professionals

    Common Interview Questions for Financial Auditors

    Identify questions commonly asked at financial auditor job interviews, and learn to formulate winning responses that give your candidacy a boost.
  9. Stock Analysis

    If You Had Invested Right After Cisco's IPO

    Discover how Cisco became one of the greatest IPOs in history during the 1990s and how it continues to innovate and move forward today.
  10. Stock Analysis

    If You Had Invested Right After Amgen's IPO

    Discover how $1,000 invested in Amgen during its initial public offering (IPO), without reinvesting dividends, would be worth over $427,000 as of November 2015.
  1. When did Facebook go public?

    Facebook, Inc. (NASDAQ: FB) went public with its initial public offering (IPO) on May 18, 2012. With a peak market capitalization ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. How do hedge funds use equity options?

    With the growth in the size and number of hedge funds over the past decade, the interest in how these funds go about generating ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Do financial advisors have to find their own clients?

    Nearly all financial advisors, particularly when new to the field, have to find their own clients. An employer may provide ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Do financial advisors get drug tested?

    Financial advisors are not drug tested by any federal or state regulatory body. This means you may receive your Series 6, ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Is a financial advisor required to have a degree?

    Financial advisors are not required to have university degrees. However, they are required to pass certain exams administered ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Do financial advisors have to be licensed?

    Financial advisors must possess various securities licenses in order to sell investment products. The specific products an ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Hot Definitions
  1. Bar Chart

    A style of chart used by some technical analysts, on which, as illustrated below, the top of the vertical line indicates ...
  2. Bullish Engulfing Pattern

    A chart pattern that forms when a small black candlestick is followed by a large white candlestick that completely eclipses ...
  3. Cyber Monday

    An expression used in online retailing to describe the Monday following U.S. Thanksgiving weekend. Cyber Monday is generally ...
  4. Take A Bath

    A slang term referring to the situation of an investor who has experienced a large loss from an investment or speculative ...
Trading Center