Whether by accident or by design, the environmental movement has increasingly turned to blaming capitalism for polluting the earth. While it's true that the industrial revolution, a child of capitalism without a doubt, produced modern pollution, it's wrong to polarize the argument against the capitalist system. The idea that green and capitalist are absolutely opposed shows a misunderstanding of free markets and a lack of faith in the individual. In this article, we'll look at how capitalism can make "going green" a workable system rather than a revolutionary dream.

Property Rights Prevent Overuse and Pollution
The fact is that pollution is often the product of weak property rights. When nobody owns it, no one takes care of it. This concept dates back to times before the industrial revolution when grazing lands were public and, consequently, farmers and livestock owners allowed their animals to overgraze simply because there was no incentive not to. Only when lands were enclosed and property rights established did people start rotational feeding and other techniques to conserve the land. Parallels can be found in public lakes (overfishing), public roads (traffic jams from volume, irregular maintenance) and many other situations.

The alternative is hard for us to picture, because there is so much public land in America. But if you own a river and a company wants to pipe its sewage into it, you'd likely demand a monthly fee at the very least. This would produce a cost for the company and encourage it to find ways to reduce that cost. Sewage is an interesting type of pollutant, because up until the 19th century there was a private disposal system in which companies would buy waste from urban households to sell as fertilizers to farmers. When public sewage systems were laid out, all this waste was simply dumped in the nearest body of water – not exactly an environmental improvement. (For more, check out Top 10 Green Industries.)

Excessive Consumption Comes from Price Controls
Similar to the problem of property rights, public services often encourage consumption. If we paid for public services like we do for private services, there would be less waste. Imagine if you paid per bag or per pound to throw your garbage in a landfill. In this case, reusing things and reducing waste would have an obvious financial benefit by reducing your garbage bill. A private dump could easily impose this system, whereas the public system would have to retool the waste industry in such a way that tracked each household's garbage and then offered a tax refund at the end of the calendar year. It may still work, but it would provide less motivation than having a bill coming at you every month telling you how much it's costing you to be wasteful. (For more, see Less Trash For More Cash.)

The damage of price controls was most visible when the government tried to protect the public from the oil shock. By legislating lower-than-market prices, public consumption stayed the same until supply was severely depleted. If prices had floated, most people wouldn't have been able to buy gas. With price controls, everyone could afford gas, but there was little to no gas for anyone to buy. Market prices are one of the most powerful ways to conserve resources because, as the cost goes up, people naturally cut back on consumption. This applies to everything from apples to zinc.

Good Business Means Less Waste
Capitalism is driven by profit and cost.When you and your competitor are selling the same product, one of the best ways to beat him or her out is to produce it more efficiently. This means wasting less resources producing it and thus creating less waste in the end. This can be seen from the time J.D. Rockefeller used "waste" byproducts from oil and made them into other products like lubricants and paint. Competitors were dumping these byproducts in the river. If a company can cut its waste or consumption, its costs will fall, thus increasing its profits. This drive for profits produces more efficient, and thus greener technology, not legislation. (To learn more, see J.D Rockefeller: From Oil Baron To Billionaire.)

Legislation can be helpful for guidelines, but the best companies will naturally exceed these if the solution is truly better. For example, insulation makers have found that recycled glass takes the same amount of energy to melt and spin into bats as virgin materials like sand. The average amount of recycled glass used is between 30% and 40%. If a large source of glass - like a bottle depot or crushed glass outlet - is nearby, then a single factory may have as high as 80%, but only if it makes sense cost-wise. Legislating an 80% content will remove the environmental benefit of the plants already using that much because many other plants in less ideal locations will have to burn fossil fuels to ship heavy containers from all over in order to get enough materials. It is a rare company that is willfully wasteful, and these often don't survive for long. Sometimes, however, it is hard to see why a law that is more environmentally friendly on the surface can actually be harmful in aggregate.

If I Knew what I Know Now, When I was Younger …
A sticking point for most people is the idea of huge faceless conglomerates dumping materials into rivers, oceans, skies and meadows. There are a few problems. One is the word "dumping." Often, these companies were following the regulations of the time – a time when environmental impact wasn't a consideration. In fact, one of the great scientific disciplines, oceanography, used to have the stated goal of exploring the oceans for the best places to sink barrels of toxic waste. This is more an issue of education/knowledge than capitalism.

Property rights would have given these companies pause, due to possible legal costs. And many companies have rightly been stung by class action lawsuits. This legal risk encourages them to reduce waste and change their habits in the same way a per-bag fee would make households more environmentally conscious. Industry is much cleaner today than in the 1920s, '50s or '70s. This progress is often belittled as too slow, but environmental education has only become widespread since the '70s. The economics of waste led to capitalism cleaning things up long before the general public knew how important it was. (Learn more in What Does It Mean To Be Green?)

Conclusion: Every Individual Makes a Difference
One of the great ironies of the hostility between green movements and capitalism is that the same message is at the heart. Both emphasize the importance of each individual looking after his/her own interest. For the green movement, it's in your interest to conserve, recycle and generally avoid polluting because we only have one earth. For capitalism, you watch out for your economic interests – you conserve water because water costs money, you reuse to avoid wasteful buying and so on. When property rights are explicit in the capitalist system, going green is not a moral decision, but an economic reality. Capitalism comes out of the self-interest of the individual – and if more and more people wish to go green, capitalism is the quickest and most efficient system for making that wish come true.(For more on this topic, check out our Investopedia Special Feature: Green Investing.)

Related Articles
  1. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    3 PIMCO Funds Rated 5 Stars by Morningstar

    Learn about three fixed income mutual funds managed by Pacific Investment Management Company (PIMCO) that have received five-star overall ratings from Morningstar.
  2. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    3 Invesco Funds Rated 5 Stars by Morningstar

    Learn about the top three mutual funds administered and managed by Invesco Ltd. that have received a five-star overall rating from Morningstar.
  3. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    The Top 5 Large Cap Core ETFs for 2016 (VUG, SPLV)

    Look out for these five ETFs in 2016, and learn why investors should closely watch how the Federal Reserve moves heading into the new year.
  4. Fundamental Analysis

    The 3 Best Investments When Bull Markets Slow Down

    Find out why no bull market lasts forever, and why investors should shift their assets away from growth and toward dividends when stocks slow down.
  5. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Top 3 PIMCO Funds for Retirement Diversification in 2016

    Explore analyses of the top three PIMCO funds for 2016 and learn how these funds can be used to create a diversified retirement portfolio.
  6. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    The 4 Best Lord Abbett Mutual Funds

    Discover the four best mutual funds administered and managed by Lord, Abbett & Co., LLC that offer investors a wide variety of investment strategies.
  7. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    The 3 Best Vanguard Funds for Value Investors in 2016

    Find out which of Vanguard's value funds are the best for building a solid core-satellite value investing strategy for your portfolio.
  8. Investing Basics

    5 Questions First Time Investors Should Ask in 2016

    Learn five of the most important questions you need to ask if you are a new investor planning on starting an investment program in 2016.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    The 4 Best Fidelity Funds for Growth Investors in 2016

    Find out which of Fidelity's growth funds are the best funds for building a solid core satellite growth investing strategy for 2016.
  10. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    The 5 Best US Small Cap Value Index Mutual Funds

    Find out which index mutual funds do the best at investing in small-cap value stocks for higher potential returns at the lowest cost.
RELATED FAQS
  1. What is a derivative?

    A derivative is a contract between two or more parties whose value is based on an agreed-upon underlying financial asset, ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What's the difference between microeconomics and macroeconomics?

    Microeconomics is generally the study of individuals and business decisions, macroeconomics looks at higher up country and ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How liquid are Vanguard mutual funds?

    The Vanguard mutual fund family is one of the largest and most well-recognized fund family in the financial industry. Its ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How do mutual funds work in India?

    Mutual funds in India work in much the same way as mutual funds in the United States. Like their American counterparts, Indian ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Are UTMA accounts escheatable?

    Like most financial assets held by institutions such as banks and investment firms, UTMA accounts can be escheated by state ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What are the dormancy and escheatment rules for stock accounts?

    While the specific dormancy and escheatment rules for stock accounts vary by state, all states provide for the escheatment ... Read Full Answer >>
Hot Definitions
  1. Presidential Election Cycle (Theory)

    A theory developed by Yale Hirsch that states that U.S. stock markets are weakest in the year following the election of a ...
  2. Super Bowl Indicator

    An indicator based on the belief that a Super Bowl win for a team from the old AFL (AFC division) foretells a decline in ...
  3. Flight To Quality

    The action of investors moving their capital away from riskier investments to the safest possible investment vehicles. This ...
  4. Discouraged Worker

    A person who is eligible for employment and is able to work, but is currently unemployed and has not attempted to find employment ...
  5. Ponzimonium

    After Bernard Madoff's $65 billion Ponzi scheme was revealed, many new (smaller-scale) Ponzi schemers became exposed. Ponzimonium ...
  6. Quarterly Earnings Report

    A quarterly filing made by public companies to report their performance. Included in earnings reports are items such as net ...
Trading Center