To understand what has transpired in the four years since TARP was signed into law, a little history is in order.

The story goes something like this: In 2001, in order to fend off what officials feared would be a nasty recession, the Federal Reserve lowered the Fed Funds rate to stimulate the economy. Over the next few years, banks opened up their coffers (full of cheap money from the Fed) and loaned it to almost anybody who would take it. People who otherwise could not afford a home, now qualified. Eventually, those less-than-qualified, or subprime borrowers, could not afford the payments, and this caused lenders to file for bankruptcy, thus propelling the country into the Great Recession.

Which brings us to four years ago. In 2008, President George W. Bush signed the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) into law. This law gave the Department of the Treasury the right to purchase or guarantee troubled assets. Much of the purchasing of these troubled assets, also called toxic assets, was in the form of risky mortgage-backed securities that were weighing on the banks' balance sheets.

Soon after enactment of the $700 billion Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, sometimes called "The TARP Act," the government earmarked the first $250 billion for the Capital Purchase Program (CPP). This program infused capital into larger banks with the hope of shoring up their balance sheets, giving them the confidence to lend money once again.

When the media began using the word, "bailout," the program quickly became controversial and still, four years later, TARP is seen as a program that gave banks deemed "too big to fail" a lifeline that average tax-paying citizens do not have. According to the CBO, TARP was not a means to throw away $700 billion of taxpayer dollars. Although the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act reduced the available funds from $700 billion to $475 billion, the controversy is still alive. Four years later, however, the statistics are much less ominous.

How Much Was Lent?
As part of the program, The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is required to release semiannual reports on the cost of TARP. The Congressional Budget Office is then required to review the report and issue a statement of its own. In its latest release, OMB reported that of the original $700 billion, it disbursed only $431 billion.

How Much Went to Financial Institutions?
According to the October 2012 CBO report, the government disbursed $313 billion to financial institutions, almost all of which was paid back. The CBO estimates that taxpayers will realize a net gain of about $25 billion.

Capital Repurchase Program
The Capital Purchase Program allowed the government to purchase equity in financial institutions to bolster their financial stability. The government purchased $205 billion worth of preferred stock from 707 financial institutions. Of that investment, those institutions paid back $192 billion, or 94%. The CBO believes that taxpayers will see a net gain of $18 billion from that program.

The Auto Industry
General Motors and Chrysler received about $79 billion in disbursements from TARP funds, in addition to $5 billion in loans to parts manufacturers. In the end, the government only distributed $413 million to parts manufacturers, bringing the total cost to about $80 billion. To date, approximately $35 billion has been recouped.

The Bottom Line
The TARP program is estimated to cost taxpayers about $32 billion, much less than the OMB's report that estimated $63 billion. This is largely because the CBO projects a lower cost for the mortgage programs.

Although some of the funds will be lost or written off, the program comes at a much lower cost than previously expected and, while it is true that TARP provided an infusion of capital to banks (some would say they were "bailed out"), most of the banks have paid back the funds with interest.

Related Articles
  1. Economics

    Understanding Donald Trump's Stance on China

    Find out why China bothers Donald Trump so much, and why the 2016 Republican presidential candidate argues for a return to protectionist trade policies.
  2. Economics

    Will Putin Ever Leave Office?

    Find out when, or if, Russian President Vladimir Putin will ever relinquish control over the Russian government, and whether it matters.
  3. Economics

    The Difference Between Finance And Economics

    Finance and economics are often taught as separate subjects, but they are interrelated disciplines that influence one another in many ways.
  4. Economics

    Understanding Tragedy of the Commons

    The tragedy of the commons describes an economic problem in which individuals try to reap the greatest benefits from a given resource.
  5. Markets

    Will Paris Attacks Undo the European Union Dream?

    Last Friday's attacks in Paris are transforming the migrant crisis into an EU security threat, which could undermine the European Union dream.
  6. Budgeting

    How Much Will it Cost to Become President In 2016?

    The 2016 race to the White House will largely be determined by who can spend the most money. Here is a look at how much it will cost to win the presidency.
  7. Markets

    Can Deflation Be Good?

    General economic theory consensus rules that deflation is bad for the economy. But the Swiss economy, which is growing despite a drop in prices for the last four years, is proving otherwise. ...
  8. Economics

    Current Probability of Donald Trump as President

    Predict the current odds of a Donald Trump presidency, and understand the factors that have kept him on top and the looming challenges he faces.
  9. Economics

    Understanding a Free Market Economy

    Why would we want a free market economy?
  10. Economics

    How a Monopoly Works

    In economics, a monopoly occurs when one company is the sole (or nearly sole) provider of a good or service within an industry. This potentially allows that company to become powerful enough ...
  1. Is Nigeria a developed country?

    Nigeria is not a developed country by any reasonable standard. The country's per capita gross domestic product (GDP) is much ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Is Colombia an emerging market economy?

    Colombia meets the criteria of an emerging market economy. The South American country has a much lower gross domestic product, ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Is Mexico an emerging market economy?

    Mexico meets all the criteria of an emerging market economy. The country's gross domestic product, or GDP, per capita beats ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Is Argentina a developed country?

    Argentina is not a developed country. It has one of the strongest economies in South America or Central America and ranks ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Is Brazil a developed country?

    Brazil is not a developed country. Though it has the largest economy in South America or Central America, Brazil is still ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the Social Security administration responsible for?

    The main responsibility of the U.S. Social Security Administration, or SSA, is overseeing the country's Social Security program. ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Hot Definitions
  1. Barefoot Pilgrim

    A slang term for an unsophisticated investor who loses all of his or her wealth by trading equities in the stock market. ...
  2. Quick Ratio

    The quick ratio is an indicator of a company’s short-term liquidity. The quick ratio measures a company’s ability to meet ...
  3. Black Tuesday

    October 29, 1929, when the DJIA fell 12% - one of the largest one-day drops in stock market history. More than 16 million ...
  4. Black Monday

    October 19, 1987, when the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) lost almost 22% in a single day. That event marked the beginning ...
  5. Monetary Policy

    Monetary policy is the actions of a central bank, currency board or other regulatory committee that determine the size and ...
  6. Indemnity

    Indemnity is compensation for damages or loss. Indemnity in the legal sense may also refer to an exemption from liability ...
Trading Center