In 1979, Chrysler was on the verge of bankruptcy and in desperate need of a $1.5 billion loan from the federal government. These troubles began back in the 1960s, when the company tried to expand within the United States as well as worldwide in an attempt to catch up to its main competitors. In hindsight it was ill advised, as the 1970s would have three recessions, two energy crises and new government environmental and fuel-efficiency standards. The fear of millions of jobs being lost, along with resurgent German and Japanese auto industries, had many concerned that an already weak economy could be pushed into a depression.

Just how exactly did an American icon fall into such a precarious position? And why did the government bail out the company instead of letting it fail? To answer these questions we will explore a number of factors that contributed to the company's decline, as well as the motivation for the government bailout. (For background reading, see Top 6 U.S. Government Financial Bailouts.)

What Led to Chrysler's Downfall?

Looking back, there is no single factor that drove Chrysler to the brink of bankruptcy. However, when you combine all of the factors together, it becomes clear how the company fell into a desperate situation over time. Factors that led to the company's near-bankruptcy include:

  1. High Gas Prices
    During the 1970s, Chrysler was affected by two major spikes in the price of oil and gasoline. This created a chain reaction as many consumers cut back on the purchase of big-ticket items such as cars, while those who were in the market for new ones simply went to Chrysler's Japanese and German competitors, which offered fuel-efficient cars that could accommodate their already tight budgets in a major energy crisis. This contributed to falling sales at the automaker. (For further reading, see Analyzing Auto Stocks.)

  2. High Interest Rates
    High energy prices helped contribute to high inflation, which forced the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates to fight spiraling costs. The more interest rates rose, the more the economy slowed and the more expensive it became to obtain financing to purchase a new car. The high interest rates and slow economy caused many consumers to simply put off their automobile purchases until later on. (For further reading, see Curbing The Effects Of Inflation.)

  3. Dropping Automobile Sales
    With high gas prices and high interest rates, the inevitable started happening at Chrysler: falling sales. While its competitors, Ford (NYSE:F) and GM (NYSE:GM), were affected as well, they were much larger and were more able to withstand falling sales compared to Chrysler. (Read more about what makes GM a successful company in Getting To Know Business Models.)

  4. Types Of Vehicles Sold
    In 1979, Chrysler specialized in making large cars, vans and recreational vehicles. As oil and gas prices rose sharply, many consumers purchased the more fuel-efficient cars that were produced by competitors. A second problem that Chrysler had in this area was that, unlike its competitors, Chrysler would produce automobiles on speculation versus building the cars as the orders were received by the dealers. Since Chrysler's dealers were having trouble selling the company's inefficient cars, this led to an inventory build-up on Chrysler lots. (Read about the importance of inventory levels in Measuring Company Efficiency.)

  5. Downgraded Debt
    With the massive amounts of unsold cars and dropping sales, many credit-rating agencies downgraded the company's debt. This meant that in order for them to raise money, they either had to pay more interest on any debt to keep the company running or simply be unable to raise additional funds in the markets. Chrysler chose to not raise funds in the public markets, meaning that they had to make what little working capital they had on hand work for them. This created a situation where the company was losing vast amounts of money, and in the course of just six months, the company went from $1.1 billion in working capital to just over $800 million. Analysts were worried that the company's working capital would drop to $600 million and it would violate its credit agreement with 180 banks and put the company in default. (Read more about debt ratings in The Debt Ratings Debate. See how working capital impacts a company's bottom line in Working Capital Works.)

  6. Heavy International Competition
    After the end of World War II, the American automakers were the premier car manufacturers in the world. However, in the late 1960s, Germany and Japan started to aggressively market cars in the United States. The types of cars that they made were generally perceived to be of better quality and more fuel efficient than the American cars.

    As the cost of oil and gasoline rose sharply, many consumers decided that they would rather own the more fuel-efficient cars as opposed togas-guzzling American cars. Chrysler found its sales dropping as many buyers went to foreign competitors to buy the cars they were looking for. This meant that Chrysler was left with unsold cars that consumers no longer wanted to buy. (Learn some telling signs of changing market share in Great Expectations: Forecasting Sales Growth.)

Why Was Chrysler Saved?
Looking back, the bailout of Chrysler was an important milestone in U.S. history. It came at a time when the Cold War was at its height and the perceived economic decline of the U.S. was in full force. For many, the fall of an American icon would have led the country down a path of economic hardship that would be hard to break. However, there were many other reasons why Washington refused to allow this giant to disappear:

  1. National Security Implications
    In 1977, Chrysler was awarded the contract to build the M-1 Abrams tank. Since the 1960s, NATO had been looking for a tank that could replace its older models. The fear was that if Chrysler went under, the national security of the country would be compromised by the loss of a manufacturer for tanks, trucks and other vehicles. At the height of the Cold War, it was thought the country had to be ready for anything. (Read about war's effect on financial jargon in War's Influence On Wall Street.)

  2. Saving Jobs
    Had Chrysler been allowed to fail, there would have immediately been 360,000 jobs lost. According to the Congressional Budget Office in 1979, this would have caused a nationwide ripple effect and the loss of an additional 360,000 jobs as dealers and many communities that were dependent on the automaker were forced to make drastic cutbacks as a result of the bankruptcy. The fear was that with the economy in a recession, the job losses would continue to mount. Second, the bankruptcy of the company would force $800 million in unfunded pension obligations for the auto maker's employees onto the federal government. (Read more about underfunded pensions in Analyzing Pension Risk.)

  3. Saving Suppliers
    If Chrysler had gone under, many of its suppliers would have had a difficult time surviving as well. They could have continued to work with Ford and GM, but the effects of a bankruptcy at Chrysler would have at least forced them to increase layoffs, which would have affected many communities across the country. (Rising unemployment was a hallmark of the following decade; read Stagflation, 1970s Style to learn more.)

  4. Improving American Automobiles
    Throughout the 1960s, the quality of American cars had declined sharply. Many consumers felt that the Japanese and the Germans made better-quality cars. This was one reason why so many stopped buying American cars. The potential bankruptcy of Chrysler was a wake-up call for the auto industry: It either had to start producing more reliable, better-quality cars or it would continue to face major declines in sales. (Read more about the beginnings of this all-American industry in Henry Ford: Industry Mogul And Industrial Innovator.)

Conclusion
The problems that Chrysler faced came to the forefront in 1979. There were a number of factors that all worked together simultaneously to put the company on the verge of bankruptcy. All of these factors forced the company to heavily lobby both Congress and the White House for a $1.5 billion loan to stay in business and protect millions of jobs.

While many critics wonder whether Chrysler's 1979 bailout actually worked, the facts show that the company was able to come out of the financial situation it was in and develop cars that the public would once again buy, such as the K-car, Avery and minivan. As such, the Chrysler bailout in 1979 suggests that - when done right - government bailouts can contribute to long-term growth and stability in the economy.

Related Articles
  1. Investing Basics

    Breaking Down Optimal Capital Structure

    An optimal capital structure shows the best balance of debt to equity a company can have in order to minimize its cost of capital.
  2. Insurance

    Top 5 Car Insurance Companies in Texas

    Examine the five biggest automobile insurance companies operating in the state of Texas, ranked based on market share in the state.
  3. Insurance

    Top 8 Car Insurance Companies in New Jersey

    Read about the top personal auto insurers operating in New Jersey, and learn about recent trends in market share among these companies.
  4. Term

    What is a Preemptive Right?

    A preemptive right allows select shareholders to buy newly issued shares in their corporation before the general public.
  5. Investing

    The Unintended Consequences of Self-Driving Cars

    An overview of some unintended consequences of the driverless car revolution.
  6. Investing News

    China's Government to Stop Intervening in Stock Markets

    China’s stock market, measured by Shanghai Composite Index, lost about 17% of its value in the first three days of week ending August 28, 2015 before recovering its value by 11% in the last two ...
  7. Economics

    Understanding Switching Costs

    Consumers incur switching costs when they receive a monetary or other type of penalty for changing a supplier, brand or product.
  8. Investing

    What’s Holding Back the U.S. Consumer

    Even as job growth has surged and gasoline prices have plunged, U.S. consumers are proving slow to respond and repair their overextended balance sheets.
  9. Economics

    Explaining Market Penetration

    Market penetration is the measure of how much a good or service is being used within a total potential market.
  10. Economics

    Calculating the Marginal Rate of Substitution

    The marginal rate of substitution determines how much of one good a consumer will give up to obtain extra units of another good.
RELATED TERMS
  1. Sticky Wage Theory

    An economic hypothesis theorizing that pay of employees tends ...
  2. Earnings Before Interest & Tax ...

    An indicator of a company's profitability, calculated as revenue ...
  3. Record Date

    The cut-off date established by a company in order to determine ...
  4. Interest Coverage Ratio

    A debt ratio and profitability ratio used to determine how easily ...
  5. Monetary Policy

    The actions of a central bank, currency board or other regulatory ...
  6. Corporate Social Responsibility

    Corporate initiative to assess and take responsibility for the ...
RELATED FAQS
  1. How is the Federal Reserve audited?

    Contrary to conventional wisdom, the Federal Reserve is extensively audited. Politicians on the left and right of a populist ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Who decides when to print money in the US?

    The U.S. Treasury decides to print money in the United States as it owns and operates printing presses. However, the Federal ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why do some people claim the Federal Reserve is unconstitutional?

    The U.S. Constitution does not mention the need for a central bank, nor does it explicitly grant the government the power ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How can the federal reserve increase aggregate demand?

    The Federal Reserve can increase aggregate demand in indirect ways by lowering interest rates. Aggregate demand is a measure ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. How does the stock market react to changes in the Federal Funds Rate?

    The stock market reacts to changes in the federal funds rate in various ways depending on where it is in the business cycle. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. How does the bond market react to changes in the Federal Funds Rate?

    The bond market is highly sensitive to changes in the federal funds rate. When the Federal Reserve increases the federal ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
×

You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!