On May 6, 2010, the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged 998.5 points in just 20 minutes, wiping out more than $1 trillion in market value, before rebounding and closing only slightly down for the day. More than 21,000 trades were canceled as a result, 68% of which were ETF trades. An investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) cited ETFs as a significant player in the crash. In November 2010, the Kauffman Group threw fuel on the fire, with a controversial report about the perils of ETFs. Although the authors were forced to revise and tone down their remarks in response to an onslaught of bad press from ETF providers, the press heavily reported the Kaufmann Group's initial findings.

SEE: Exchange Traded Funds

What Happened on May 6
The SEC's reconstruction of the events of May 6 begins with a volatile day in the markets due to concerns over Greek debt. When a single firm, Waddell & Reed Financial, placed a sell order for E-Mini S&P 500 futures contracts (one of the two most active stock index products) the automated sell order was set to be executed based on trading volume, with no relationship to price or time. These intricacies of electronic trading would play a key role in the crash, as other traders saw the sell order and placed their own sells. Arbitrage trades kicked in, with investors seeking to profit from price differences created on various exchanges by the high volume of sell requests, which further increased trading volume.

SEE: Minis Provide Low-Cost Entry To Futures Market

As the number of requests to sell increased while remaining unfilled, volume accumulated and the algorithm behind Waddell's trade sped up. The automated trading program attempted to dump in 20 minutes a volume of contracts that generally takes most of a full day to trade. The automated sell order was placed, even though Waddell's initial sell orders had not been filled.

Between 2:45:13 and 2:45:27, automated, high-frequency trading accounted for 27,000 E-mini trades as prices continued to decline. At 2:45:25, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) halted trading for five seconds in an effort to break the pattern of declining prices. The move was effective in that the E-mini market bounced back when trading resumed, but the volatility in trading served as a catalyst for a sell-off in the broader market.

Automatic trading systems at other firms paused because of the broad market decline. By 2:45 PM, the liquidity crisis that led to a downward price trend in E-minis had spread to the broad market as automatic trading programs weren't trading and humans stepped in to review the state of the market and attempt to determine its impact on their profits and losses. During this time, automated trades weren't taking place and trade requests found no buyers or sellers. This led to the execution of trades based on stub quotes, which are placeholder numbers put in the system by market makers or by the security exchanges themselves on behalf of the market. This is done to maintain trading liquidity by having a price quote in response to every quote request.

These stub quotes (at prices as low as one cent and as high as $100,000) were never meant to be used for actual trades, but in the illiquid markets they were executed as legitimate quotes. In a world where trades occur in fractions of a second, 20 minutes is an eternity. From 2:40 p.m. to 3:00 p.m., the SEC reported that two billion trades were executed, with a trading volume in excess of $56 billion. As a result, 8,000 individual equity securities and ETFs posted losses with "over 20,000 trades across more than 300 securities…executed at prices more than 60% away from their values only moments before." Regulators reversed many of the trades - with ETF trades accounting for a disproportional 68% of the reversals.

Investor Awareness
In the aftermath of the crash, ETFs came under heavy scrutiny and criticism. Since the time of their invention, ETFs had been marketed as "mutual funds that trade like stocks." The high liquidity was noted as the primary difference between ETFs (which are priced and traded throughout the day like stocks) and mutual funds (which are priced and traded once per day). The liquidity hurt during the flash crash. While ETF investors took a wild ride, mutual fund investors did not.

The lesson here is that while ETFs are not evil, they are complex. The oversimplification of ETF marketing masks a complex world of high-frequency trading, short selling, complex investment structures and other complicated machinations and practices that most investors aren't even aware of, much less understand. In the aftermath of the flash crash, the industry predictably defended the fast-growing ETF market and automated, high-frequency trading practices. Industry "experts" claimed that concerns about ETFs are only theoretical and that the investments are safe. Of course, in recent memory other "experts" said that the banks were solvent, Enron and AIG were good companies, the real estate downturn wouldn't last, diversification would help during a broad market decline and competition would create a good healthcare system too. As usual, "let the buyer beware" is a good mantra for investors.

The Bottom Line
In the wake of the flash crash, some firms put circuit breakers in place to halt ETF trading if market events appear abnormal. Also, most ETFs have the right to reject redemption requests, a clause that can be invoked in response to a run on a fund, so the fund itself would not collapse if everyone wanted to redeem at the same time - but the investors wouldn't get their money.

The crash is a reminder to investors to do the research before investing. Understand what you are buying (Did you know that ETFs may contain derivatives? Or that some experts argue that ETFs are derivatives? Do you know what a derivative is? Does your ETF have the right to refuse redemption requests?). By learning about and paying attention to the details, investors can make informed decisions. If you have done the research and understand the investment, but you are still comfortable, then you can place an informed order to buy.

SEE: Dissecting Leveraged ETF Returns

Related Articles
  1. Active Trading Fundamentals

    How Hedge Funds Front-Run Index Funds to Profit

    Understand what front running is, and learn how hedge funds use this investing strategy to profit from the anticipated stock buys of index funds.
  2. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: Schwab US Large-Cap

    Discover how the Schwab U.S. Large-Cap exchange-traded fund is managed, the index it tracks and the investors for which it is most appropriate.
  3. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETN Analysis: Rogers Intl Commodity Energy Total Return

    Learn more about the Rogers International Commodity Total Return, which is an exchange-traded note that tracks a broad index of commodity futures.
  4. Technical Indicators

    Understanding Trend Analysis

    Trend analysis is the use of past performance to predict future price movement of a security.
  5. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: ProShares UltraPro Nasdaq Biotech

    Obtain information about an ETF offerings that provides leveraged exposure to the biotechnology industry, the ProShares UltraPro Nasdaq Biotech Fund.
  6. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: iShares MSCI Europe Financials

    Learn about the iShares MSCI Europe Financials fund, which invests in numerous European financial industries, such as banks, insurance and real estate.
  7. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: SPDR S&P Insurance

    Learn about the SPDR S&P Insurance exchange-traded fund, which follows the S&P Insurance Select Industry Index by investing in equities of U.S. insurers.
  8. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap

    Learn about the SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap exchange-traded fund, which invests in small-cap firms traded at the emerging equity markets.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: ETFS Physical Platinum

    Learn about the physical platinum ETF. Platinum embarked on a bull market from 2001 to 2011, climbing to record prices along with other precious metals.
  10. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: iShares MSCI Turkey

    Learn about the iShares MSCI Turkey exchange-traded fund, which invests in a wide variety of companies' equities traded on Turkish exchanges.
  1. Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF)

    A security that tracks an index, a commodity or a basket of assets ...
  2. Regional Asset Liquidation Agreement ...

    An agreement between an asset manager and the Federal Deposit ...
  3. The New Deal

    A series of domestic programs designed to help the United States ...
  4. Accelerated Resolution Program ...

    A program designed to reduce the time and cost of resolving failed ...
  5. Exchange-Traded Mutual Funds (ETMF)

    Investopedia explains the definition of exchange-traded mutual ...
  6. Fintech

    Fintech is a portmanteau of financial technology that describes ...
  1. What assumptions are made when conducting a t-test?

    The common assumptions made when doing a t-test include those regarding the scale of measurement, random sampling, normality ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What does a high turnover ratio signify for an investment fund?

    If an investment fund has a high turnover ratio, it indicates it replaces most or all of its holdings over a one-year period. ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Does index trading increase market vulnerability?

    The rise of index trading may increase the overall vulnerability of the stock market due to increased correlations between ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. What is the difference between passive and active asset management?

    Asset management utilizes two main investment strategies that can be used to generate returns: active asset management and ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. How are double exponential moving averages applied in technical analysis?

    Double exponential moving averages (DEMAS) are commonly used in technical analysis like any other moving average indicator ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Is there a situation in which wash trading is legal?

    Wash trading, the intentional practice of manipulating a stock's activity level to deceive other investors, is not a legal ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center

You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!