Investing is often described as the balance between greed and fear; margin investing is pertinent to both. Barring individual risk tolerance, how low must interest rates go before the investor can make a solid case for using other people's money? Could there be a sweet spot? In this article we'll show you how to find one.

Margin Investing Logic
The modern portfolio theory suggests that an optimum way to invest is to find a balance between lending (Treasuries) and investing (the stock market). There are two extremes: To minimize investment risk, one should invest purely in T-bills, but if the investor seeks a higher return, he or she could invest more in the stock market. However, there is an even higher return option: borrowing against a stock portfolio and investing the proceeds in more stock - also known as "margin investing".

Ignoring volatility, a case could be made to borrow money and reinvest it if the rate is low enough and the investor's ability to bear risk is present. It is intuitive that the investor should be rewarded with more return because he or she is assuming extra risk. From here, the investor could assume that as rates move lower, the Fed is indirectly lowering the marginal lending rate to encourage people to continue to invest in companies by lowering the attractiveness of safe-haven investments. Let's examine this a little closer to see if your investment options have broadened. (Why does the Fed lower rates? Read The Federal Reserve's Fight Against Recession for more information.)

Model Portfolio
Like any working example, we have to assume certain things. Admittedly, investing is risky and requires both a financial ability to withstand price swings and a psychological tolerance to market volatility.

To make our theory work, we need to clarify our assumptions for this example. They are:

  • Investors will only be managing against margin call risk. This is the risk that underlying stocks depreciate to a below-50% equity position.
  • The goal of the investor is to maximize wealth.
  • The hypothetical investor also is affluent ($1 million in diversified investable assets) with no need for current income and has a combined marginal effective tax rate of 40%.
  • Margin rates are about 2.5% higher than our interest rate proxy, the five-year Treasury note.
What Does History Suggest?
Those who ignore history are destined to repeat it, right? Between 1965 and 2008, we'll only find the interest rate proxy going below 4% twice - in 2003 and 2007. Because we haven't yet seen the full market effect of recent rate cuts, our best bet for insight is to look at the market return over the last five years, which has been more that 50% cumulative, or about 9% annually on average. Thus, the benefit is pretty easy to see. However, let's keep looking at this, because interest rates do bounce around a lot. (Choosing the markets in which you trade is important. Learn to effectively gauge your market risk in Price Volatility Vs. Leverage.)

Playing with Fire or Warming Yourself?
Margin investing is a lot like fire. It can keep you warm (and profitable), but if it gets out of control it can burn you. Because of this margin investing is really only for the disciplined and sophisticated investor.

The ultimate risk margin investors are managing against is the risk that the loan will be called and the investor will have to sell securities in a down market, preventing the investment strategy from running its course. Keeping the underlying assets as diverse as possible is of the utmost importance. For the sake of this example, we have already assumed this. Looking at the market's average return, we assert that it is roughly based on 8% appreciation and 2% dividends and the after-tax overall return is 7%.

The margin interest expense is tax deductible. Therefore, a 40% effective marginal tax rate would cut the expense significantly. Assume the margin rate is 6.5%, you can see the after-tax cost of margin interest is 6.5%*60%=3.9%. Here, the spread made on the borrowed funds is 7%-3.9%=3.1%. Not bad.

Is Risk Calling?
Now let's look at call risk. Here we look at historical market corrections including major market crashes. A severe one could erase significant market value in a day. Thus, it's a good idea to allow for at least a 30% backslide to mitigate any margin call, leaving the  margin balance of to 70% of the equity value. Any more than this might be playing with fire rather than warming the portfolio.

Copyright © 2008
However, this is not a hard rule, assuming you can still sleep at night and fit the other criteria, some margin investing does seem logical as an investment choice. Therefore, because the range is 70-100% equity value in margin investing, perhaps your sweet spot may be a target of 85%. From here, you could pay down debt if the market falls or rates go up, and invest if the opposite is true.

The Bottom Line
It does appear that margin investing makes economic sense provided that investing disciplines are followed. After-tax market returns of approximately 9% could pay for the after-tax cost of margin funds rather nicely. However, caution needs to be exercised as market corrections are a reality.

For further reading, be sure to check out our Margin Trading tutorial.

comments powered by Disqus
Trading Center