Great companies invest in innovation. Those that roll the dice on research and development (R&D) tend to generate bigger profits than those that don't. But be careful: the world of R&D is full of questionable spending, uncertain results and payoffs that can be hard to measure. Thus, factoring R&D expenditures into profitability and share valuation is no simple affair. (For background reading, see Buying Into Corporate Research & Development.)

Tutorial: An Introduction To Fundamental Analysis

R&D Spending and Profitability
R&D spending by itself doesn't guarantee profitability and strong stock performance. Some companies see a payoff from spending heavily on R&D when projects are deemed to be successful. On the other hand, companies can also suffer from poor performance losses even after investing a great deal of money each year in R&D.

What investors need to be able to assess is the productivity of R&D dollars. To that end, I would like to introduce an R&D return metric that measures the profitability of a technology company's R&D spending. Known as return on research capital, or RORC, the metric effectively measure the proportion of profits that are generated from R&D spending in a previous period, such as the past year.

It's worthwhile to look around for companies with high RORC. The metric shows whether a firm is profiting from new R&D spending or not. At the same time, it gives investors a sense of whether recent R&D investments are contributing to financial performance or whether the company is just coasting on older innovations.

Calculating RORC
RORC tells us how much gross profit is generated for every dollar of R&D spent in the previous year. The calculation for ROC is very simple: we take the current year's gross profit dollars and divide it by the previous year's R&D expense.

The ratio looks like this:

Current Year Gross Profit
Previous Year R&D Expenditures

The numerator, or gross profit, is normally located on the current year's income statement. Sometimes companies choose not to explicitly state gross profit on their income statement. If that's the case, we can derive gross profit by subtracting cost of goods sold from revenues.

Meanwhile, you will usually find a firm's R&D on the income statement as well, but due to inconsistencies between GAAP and IFRS accounting standards, they can also be capitalized on the balance sheet. Although the two methods converge, there are discrepancies what should be regarded as an expense or an asset.

Using gross profit instead of operating profit or net profit as gross profits, arguably, offers the best representation of the incremental profitability produced by a company's R&D efforts. The calculation also assumes a one-year average investment cycle for R&D. So, last year's R&D expenditure turns into this year's new technology products, producing this year's profits.

Testing RORC
To see how the RORC works as a tool for assessing R&D productivity, let's try it on a couple of well-known technology companies, California-based Apple (Nasdaq:AAPL) and Finland's Nokia Corporation (NYSE:NOK). For each company, we will calculate RORC based on fiscal 2009 gross profit returns from fiscal 2008 R&D expenditures.

According to Apple's 2009 10-K, its 2009 gross margin is $13.14 billion. In its financial statements, Apple offers R&D expenditures for 2009 and the previous two years. In 2008, Apple spent 1.109 billion on R&D. Applying the RORC ratio, you'll see that for every dollar that Apple spent on R&D in 2008, it generated $11.84 in 2009 gross profit.

Apple RORC = $13140 billion
$1.109 billion
=$11.84 Gross Profit Per R&D Dollar

Applying the same methodology using Nokia's 2009 annual report, the consolidated income statement shows that Apple produced gross profit of 13.264 billion euros. The same statement shows that Nokia's 2008 R&D expenditure amounted to 5.968 billion euros. These numbers show that Nokia produced 2.22 euros of gross profit for every euro that it spent on R&D. In March 2009, one euro converted to $1.32.

Nokia RORC = ¬13.264 billion ($17.508 billion)
¬5.968 billion ($7.877 billion)
= ¬2.22 Gross Profit Per R&D Euro ($4.44 Gross Profit Per R&D Dollar)

It's pretty clear that in 2009, Apple's RORC massively outperformed Nokia's for the same period. To explain the difference, you need to understand the significant differences in the two companies' technology businesses.

Apple was able to exploit its R&D across multiple products, each with a distinct end market - Mac desktop and laptop computers, iPod handheld entertainment devices iPhone mobile phones, plus Apple TV products. What's more, Apple technologies were all built to compliment one another. As a result, an R&D investment to, say, enhance the iPhone operating system, benefited its smartphones but also its iPod Touch device. Arguably, Apple's ability to apply fairly concentrated R&D to a broad spectrum of markets is what lay behind the company's very high return on research capital.

Nokia, by contrast, represents an alternative business model. Nokia's R&D efforts were spread across three distinct software operating systems that benefited only a single end market (mobile handsets). So, when Nokia spent an additional R&D euro on a single product, it was only benefiting a subset of its overall handset opportunity, and not all its other handset product markets.

Does the Market Reward a High RORC?
Judging by the 2009 share values of Apple and Nokia, it appears that the market does reward companies that deliver with superior return on research capital. At the end of March 2009, Apple had a share price of about $113. Nokia, meanwhile, traded at about $12 per share. Fifteen months later, Nokia was trading in the $8.50 range, while Apple experienced a rapid push in upward momentum to trade around the $250 mark. The growth that Apple experienced in the aforementioned time period was largely a result of solid innovations and a high return on research capital.

Conclusion
At the end of the day, the productivity of R&D is what drives technology company profits, and ultimately their share prices. RORC offers investors a useful method of tracking technology companies' R&D productivity and also gives investors a clue as to where those companies' share values are headed. (Evaluate the past performance before investing in these types of gadget funds. To learn more, see Technology Sector Funds.)

Related Articles
  1. Investing

    What’s Holding Back the U.S. Consumer

    Even as job growth has surged and gasoline prices have plunged, U.S. consumers are proving slow to respond and repair their overextended balance sheets.
  2. Credit & Loans

    What's a Nonperforming Loan?

    A nonperforming loan is any borrowed sum where the borrower has failed to pay scheduled payments for at least 90 days.
  3. Economics

    Explaining Market Penetration

    Market penetration is the measure of how much a good or service is being used within a total potential market.
  4. Economics

    Calculating the Marginal Rate of Substitution

    The marginal rate of substitution determines how much of one good a consumer will give up to obtain extra units of another good.
  5. Economics

    Understanding Cost of Revenue

    The cost of revenue is the total costs a business incurs to manufacture and deliver a product or service.
  6. Economics

    Understanding Cash and Cash Equivalents

    Cash and cash equivalents are items that are either physical currency or liquid investments that can be immediately converted into cash.
  7. Economics

    Explaining Carrying Cost of Inventory

    The carrying cost of inventory is the cost a business pays for holding goods in stock.
  8. Investing

    How To Calculate Minority Interest

    Minority interest calculations require the use of minority shareholders’ percentage ownership of a subsidiary, after controlling interest is acquired.
  9. Stock Analysis

    The Best Stocks to Buy for Less than $10 before Year End

    Learn about the best stocks to buy under $10. These stocks are speculative but have considerable upside given their valuation and market conditions.
  10. Investing Basics

    10 Companies That Yuppies Love

    Learn about 10 companies loved by the modern Yuppie, including how this demographic's impressive buying power has boosted these companies' earnings.
RELATED TERMS
  1. Gross Profit

    A company's total revenue (equivalent to total sales) minus the ...
  2. Receivables Turnover Ratio

    An accounting measure used to quantify a firm's effectiveness ...
  3. International Financial Reporting ...

    A set of international accounting standards stating how particular ...
  4. Revenue

    The amount of money that a company actually receives during a ...
  5. Balance Sheet

    A financial statement that summarizes a company's assets, liabilities ...
  6. Equity

    The value of an asset less the value of all liabilities on that ...
RELATED FAQS
  1. What developed countries have the greatest exposure to the Internet sector?

    The Internet sector permeates all developed economies. The McKinsey Global Institute estimates that Internet companies constitute ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Are Social Security payments included in the US GDP calculation?

    Social Security payments are not included in the U.S. definition of the gross domestic product (GDP). Transfer Payments For ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What are some examples of general and administrative expenses?

    In accounting, general and administrative expenses represent the necessary costs to maintain a company's daily operations ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. When does the fixed charge coverage ratio suggest that a company should stop borrowing ...

    Since the fixed charge coverage ratio indicates the number of times a company is capable of making its fixed charge payments ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. How often should a small business owner go through a bank reconciliation process?

    Small business owners should go through the bank reconciliation process at least monthly, and many business consultants recommend ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between recurring and non-recurring general and administrative ...

    The difference between recurring and nonrecurring general and administrative expenses can best be understood as the difference ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
×

You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!