In pretty much all Western countries, men continue to dominate big business, and addressing this disparity is an ongoing controversy. No one can really justify the "glass ceiling" and proposals for removing it range from voluntary or even legal quotas of women on the board, to strategies by which women can break through these traditional barriers through their own skills, personality and power. It does indeed seem that when the latter occurs, but not the former, a company stands to benefit considerably. This can be seen through some of the current female CEOs at large companies.

The Evidence
In this context, some research from Switzerland (Credit Suisse) and Italy (Mara Faccio et al.) provides a compelling economic case for having high-ranking women in companies. The very substantial Credit Suisse investigation reveals that even a modest degree of reduction in male dominance quite literally pays off. The difference in share prices can be substantial, as much as 26% for large firms. Credit Suisse points out that the results are not necessarily consistent over sectors, countries and time, but that "a bit more balance" can only help.

The consultancy company McKinsey also did some research on this issue and found that firms with more women in senior management did particularly well on various criteria, such as return on equity, operating profits and stock prices. The consultants even described the link between promoting women and doing well as "striking."

The Reasons
Why exactly this occurs is quite complex and there are various possible explanations. For one thing, male domination was also prominent among those causing the financial crisis from 2008 onwards. It is thus logical to look to women as a promising potential source of more prudent financial management. Indeed, it does seem that "less testosterone" reduces the tendency to take excessive risks. This notion has been confirmed by the Italian research mentioned above and from John Coates in Cambridge, England.

There are other factors as well. Some experts believe that the financial crisis has induced many firms to reconsider the way they run their businesses and diversity is one of the core issues that have emerged.

There is a huge body of research on the benefits of diversity and of a combination of leadership styles, indicating that a good gender mix helps raise efficiency, leading to more effective controls and monitoring. There is substantial evidence of productive managerial differences between the genders. Furthermore, women naturally understand other women better, or at least differently, than men, so they can cater more effectively to the "other half" of the population. More women at the top may therefore indicate that a company is doing well and has a sound, state of the art approach to management.

Yet another and quite different explanation (and a warning) is provided by Frank Dobbin and Jiwook Jung of the Harvard University Department of Sociology. They argue that "investor bias" may raise share prices where there are more female board members. They found that blockholding investors are careful not to look like they discriminate against firms with more female directors, even if they are skeptical of the real economic benefits. Furthermore, non-blockholders do not react negatively. Yet, Dobbin and Jung point out that, "the big picture seems to be that gender diversity does not help firms and may hurt them."

Whatever the Case, Let Gender Balance Occur Naturally
Kenneth Ahern and Amy Dittmar from the University of Michigan found that a legally-enforced quota is counterproductive. "Forced diversity" not only runs counter to fundamental market and efficiency-inducing forces, but obliges companies to appoint people for the wrong reasons. Radical changes are far less effective than allowing economic realities to prevail over time. Evidence from Norway in particular, with its 40% quota for female managers, indicates that such drastic measures can have disastrous consequences. In fact, the threat of a quota is arguably a better way to encourage progress, rather than actually proceeding with legislation.

It is also important to note that the male-female ratio differs naturally from sector to sector. For instance, there tend to be more women in consumer goods and the health sector, compared to automotive industries, or to use an even more extreme example, weapons manufacturing.

A Methodological Word of Warning from Harvard
Getting back to the Harvard sociologists, it is important to note that how exactly the research is done appears to impact quite substantially, and even fundamentally, on the results. Dobbin and Jung warn that "the effects of board diversity on corporate performance are not well understood." Specifically, they explain that studies comparing data at two points in time indicate that gender diversity in boards enhances stock values and profitability, but that panel data over several years yield either no or even negative effects. Clearly, more research is needed to resolve this ambivalence and uncertainty.

The Future Looks Reasonably Promising
Fortunately, research suggests that the gender imbalance is slowly but surely moving in the right direction. Egon Zehnder International has established that, in Europe, women's share of board seats has risen, albeit not terribly fast. But the trend is there all right, and there is no reason for it to slow down or go into reverse. There is still a long way to go, but the signs are there that we are heading firmly in the right direction.

The Bottom Line
Despite the debate on the merits or demerits of capitalism and of neoliberalism, and the massive shocks to the system in recent years, market forces and economic rationality remain vital. While the need for financial regulation seems clearer than ever, female managers are obviously, and without artificial support, proving their economic worth when given the chance. The glass gender ceiling is not productive, but on the other hand, one should not attempt to break it by force. Women are quite capable of proving their worth in raising corporate value through various financial, managerial and human capabilities that they can provide and men cannot.

Related Articles
  1. Investing Basics

    What are the fiduciary responsibilities of board members?

    Find out what fiduciary duties a board of directors owes to the company and its shareholders, including the duties of care, good faith and loyalty.
  2. Economics

    What's a Horizontal Merger?

    A horizontal merger occurs when companies within the same industry merge.
  3. Investing

    A Breakdown Of Stock Buybacks

    Find out what these company programs achieve and what it means for stockholders.
  4. Economics

    3 Notorious American White Collar Criminals

    Learn about the crimes and punishments of some of the most infamous convicted white-collar crooks.
  5. Investing

    From Supermodel to Entrepreneur: Gisele Bündchen's Sejaa Pure Skincare

    As one of the highest-paid models in history, Bündchen has turned her name and image into a worldwide brand, and Sejaa is part of her massive empire.
  6. Economics

    What Is Servant Leadership?

    Servant leadership emphasizes innovation, employee empowerment, and the development of leaders who serve an organization’s stakeholders first.
  7. Economics

    Understanding Corporate Culture

    Corporate culture encompasses the beliefs and behaviors that determine how a company and its employees interact and how they work with customers.
  8. Professionals

    How to Strategize for Newly-Single Clients

    The loss of a spouse is a major life change. During this period, advisors have an opportunity to ensure a client's smooth transition to financial success.
  9. Fundamental Analysis

    The Basics Of Corporate Structure

    CEOs, CFOs, presidents and vice presidents: learn how to tell the difference.
  10. Investing News

    Why Are So Few Women in Finance? It's Complicated

    The number of women entering the finance world continues to decline for a variety of reasons but a game-changing new nonprofit challenges the status quo.
  1. How do modern companies assess business risk?

    Before a business can assess or mitigate business risk, it must first identify probable or likely risks to its bottom line. ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Why has emphasis on corporate governance grown in the 21st century?

    Corporate governance refers to operational practices, management protocols, and other governing rules or principles by which ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What impact did the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have on corporate governance in the United ...

    After a prolonged period of corporate scandals involving large public companies from 2000 to 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Why should investors research the C-suite executives of a company?

    C-suite executives are essential for creating and enacting overall firm strategy and are therefore an important aspect of ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What is the difference between a direct and an indirect distribution channel?

    A direct distribution channel is organized and managed by the firm itself. An indirect distribution channel relies on intermediaries ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. How can an investor determine a company's annual return from looking at its financial ...

    The funds in a share premium account cannot be used for a company's general expenses. These funds are restricted in terms ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Hot Definitions
  1. Take A Bath

    A slang term referring to the situation of an investor who has experienced a large loss from an investment or speculative ...
  2. Black Friday

    1. A day of stock market catastrophe. Originally, September 24, 1869, was deemed Black Friday. The crash was sparked by gold ...
  3. Turkey

    Slang for an investment that yields disappointing results or turns out worse than expected. Failed business deals, securities ...
  4. Barefoot Pilgrim

    A slang term for an unsophisticated investor who loses all of his or her wealth by trading equities in the stock market. ...
  5. Quick Ratio

    The quick ratio is an indicator of a company’s short-term liquidity. The quick ratio measures a company’s ability to meet ...
  6. Black Tuesday

    October 29, 1929, when the DJIA fell 12% - one of the largest one-day drops in stock market history. More than 16 million ...
Trading Center