The main purpose of equity valuation is to estimate a value for a firm or security. A key assumption of any fundamental value technique is that the value of the security (in this case an equity or a stock) is driven by the fundamentals of the firm’s underlying business at the end of the day. There are three primary equity valuation models: the discounted cash flow (DCF), cost and comparable approaches. The comparable model is a relative valuation approach and is explained in more detail below.

Comp Models Introduced
The basic premise of the comparables approach is that an equity’s value should bear some resemblance to other equities in a similar class. For a stock, this can simply be determined by comparing a firm to its key rivals, or at least those rivals that operate similar businesses. Discrepancies in the value between similar firms could spell opportunity. The hope is that it means the equity being valued is undervalued and can be bought and held until the value increases. The opposite could hold true, which could present opportunity for shorting the stock, or positioning one’s portfolio to profit from a decline in its price.

There are two primary comparable approaches. The first is the most common and looks at market comparables for a firm and its peers. Common market multiples include the following: enterprise value to sales (EV/S), enterprise multiple, price to earnings (P/E), price to book (P/B) and price to free cash flow (P/FCF). To get a better indication of how a firm compares to rivals, analysts can also look at how its margin levels compare. For instance, an activist investor could make the argument that a company with averages below peers is ripe for a turnaround and subsequent increase in value should improvements occur.

The second comparables approach looks at market transactions where similar firms, or at least similar divisions, have been bought out or acquired by other rivals, private equity firms or other classes of large, deep-pocketed investors. Using this approach, an investor can get a feel for the value of the equity being valued. Combined with using market statistics to compare a firm to key rivals, multiples can be estimated to come to a reasonable estimate of the value for a firm.

Quantitative Example
The comparables approach is best illustrated through an example. Below is an analysis of the largest, most diversified chemical firms that trade in the U.S.

Comparable Company Price Enterprise Value (EV) Revenue (TTM) EPS (TTM) Free Cash Flow (FCF) per share (2012) EV ÷ Rev. Price ÷ Earnings Price ÷ FCF Gross Margin (TTM) Operating Margin (TTM)
Company Financials millions millions
Eastman Chemical Company $80.92 $17,310.00 $8,588.00 $3.38 $4.41 2 23.9 18.3 22.70% 8.70%
Dow Chemical (NYSE:DOW) $36.06 $57,850.00 $56,514.00 $2.17 $1.24 1 16.6 29.1 16.60% 7.90%
DuPont (NYSE:DD) $59.20 $62,750.00 $35,411.00 $4.81 $3.24 1.8 12.3 18.3 26.40% 8.40%
Air Products & Chemicals (NYSE:APD) $106.87 $28,130.00 $10,200.00 $4.68 $1.14 2.8 22.8 93.7 26.40% 13.00%
Huntsman Chemical (NYSE:HUN) $18.06 $8,290.00 $10,892.00 $0.41 $1.50 0.8 44 12 16.10% 1.70%
Average of Selected Multiples $34,866.00 $24,321.00 1.7 24 34.3 21.60% 7.90%

Looking at Eastman Chemical, it immediately becomes clear that it is one of the smaller among major diversified firms. The raw data used to compile the primary comparable data includes raw enterprise value, revenue and profit figures. The three primary multiples suggest that Eastman is trading above the industry average in terms of EV/revenue, and slightly below the average in terms of P/E, the most basic tool to investigate the multiple that the market is placing on a firm’s earnings.

Eastman’s P/FCF multiple, a more nuanced profit multiple that is intended to look at true cash flow by removing some of the subjectivity of reporting earnings, is well below the average, though the high level for Air Products & Chemicals (P/FCF of 93.7) looks suspect and may need an adjustment. A key part of a valuation model is to look at potential outliers and see if they need to be reconsidered or outright ignored. Leaving out Air Product’s suspect multiple puts the peer average at 19.4, which leaves Eastman still below the average, but much less so than if all multiples are considered.

The other consideration is Eastman’s income statement profitability compared to rivals. Both its gross and operating margins are above the industry average. Overall, the company looks reasonably valued, at least based on the above information. But, as detailed above, other considerations are still needed, such as a valuation by projecting growth and profit trends over the next couple of years, and really looking at the details of earnings, free cash flow, and margins to make sure they are accurate and truly representative of the company. The same goes for each individual company that makes up the comparable universe.

A final consideration is to look at market transactions. For instance, back in 2012 DuPont sold a large part of its chemical division, its performance coatings segment, to private equity giant Carlyle Group (Nasdaq:CG) for $4.9 billion and an estimated multiple of eight times EBITDA. This multiple applied to Eastman, or simply multiplying Eastman’s EBITDA of $1.7 billion over the last 12 months, would suggest an enterprise value of nearly $14 billion, or slightly below the current enterprise value that the firm is trading at. This would indicate that Eastman is overvalued by this metric, but as explained in the next section, this may not be the case.

Important Considerations
It is important to note that it can be difficult to find truly comparable companies and transactions to value an equity. This is the most challenging part of a comparables analysis. For instance, Eastman Chemical acquired rival Solutia in 2012 in an effort to have less cyclicality in its operations. DuPont’s performance coatings business is highly cyclical, so it should likely have sold at a lower valuation. As detailed above, the free cash flow multiple for Air Products looks suspect in the analysis, meaning further work is needed to determine what adjustments should be made.

Additionally, using trailing and forward multiples can make a big difference in an analysis. If a firm is growing rapidly, a historical valuation will not be overly accurate. What matters most in valuation is making a reasonable estimate of future market multiples. If profits are projected to grow faster than rivals, the value should be higher.

It is also worth noting that, of the three primary valuation approaches, the comparable approach is the only relative model. Both the cost approach and discounted cash flow are absolute models and look solely at the company being valued, which could ignore important market factors. On the flip side, the stock market can become overvalued at times, which would make a comparable approach less meaningful, especially if comps are overvalued. For this reason, using all three approaches is the best idea.

The Bottom Line
Valuation is as much art as science. Instead of obsessing over what the true dollar figure of an equity might be, it is most valuable to come down to a valuation range. For instance, if a stock trades toward the lower end, or below the lower end of a determined range, it is likely a good value. The opposite may hold true at the high end and could indicate a shorting opportunity.

Related Articles
  1. Markets

    Relative Valuation Of Stocks Can Be A Trap

    This method of valuing a company can make it look like a bargain when it is not.
  2. Investing Basics

    DCF Valuation: The Stock Market Sanity Check

    Calculate whether the market is paying too much for a particular stock.
  3. Investing

    Relative Valuation: Using Stocks To Value Other Stocks

    This effective approach will help you understand which stocks you should be investing in.
  4. Markets

    How To Choose The Best Stock Valuation Method

    Don't be overwhelmed by the many valuation techniques out there - knowing a few characteristics about a company will help you pick the best one.
  5. Bonds & Fixed Income

    Equity Valuation In Good Times And Bad

    Learn how to filter out the noise of the market place in order to find a solid way of determing a company's value.
  6. Fundamental Analysis

    5 Must-Have Metrics For Value Investors

    Focusing on certain fundamental metrics is the best way for value investors to cash in gains. Here are the most important metrics to know.
  7. Investing

    What Investors Need to Know About Returns in 2016

    Last year wasn’t a great one for investors seeking solid returns, so here are three things we believe all investors need to know about returns in 2016.
  8. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  9. Stock Analysis

    The Top 5 Micro Cap Alternative Energy Stocks for 2016 (AMSC, SLTD)

    Follow a cautious approach when purchasing micro-cap stocks in the alternative energy sector. Learn about five alternative energy micro-caps worth considering.
  10. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Porter's Five Forces on Under Armour (UA)

    Learn about Under Armour and how it differentiates itself in the competitive athletic apparel industry in light of the Porter's Five Forces Model.
  1. What is the difference between EBIT and EBITDA?

    Much of the difference between EBIT, or earnings before interest and taxes, and EBITDA, or earnings before interest, taxes, ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is Fibonacci retracement, and where do the ratios that are used come from?

    Fibonacci retracement is a very popular tool among technical traders and is based on the key numbers identified by mathematician ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What is the formula for calculating EBITDA?

    When analyzing financial fitness, corporate accountants and investors alike closely examine a company's financial statements ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How do I calculate the P/E ratio of a company?

    The price-earnings ratio (P/E ratio) is a valuation measure that compares the level of stock prices to the level of corporate ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. How do you calculate return on equity (ROE)?

    Return on equity (ROE) is a ratio that provides investors insight into how efficiently a company (or more specifically, its ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. How do you calculate working capital?

    Working capital represents the difference between a firm’s current assets and current liabilities. The challenge can be determining ... Read Full Answer >>
Hot Definitions
  1. Presidential Election Cycle (Theory)

    A theory developed by Yale Hirsch that states that U.S. stock markets are weakest in the year following the election of a ...
  2. Super Bowl Indicator

    An indicator based on the belief that a Super Bowl win for a team from the old AFL (AFC division) foretells a decline in ...
  3. Flight To Quality

    The action of investors moving their capital away from riskier investments to the safest possible investment vehicles. This ...
  4. Discouraged Worker

    A person who is eligible for employment and is able to work, but is currently unemployed and has not attempted to find employment ...
  5. Ponzimonium

    After Bernard Madoff's $65 billion Ponzi scheme was revealed, many new (smaller-scale) Ponzi schemers became exposed. Ponzimonium ...
  6. Quarterly Earnings Report

    A quarterly filing made by public companies to report their performance. Included in earnings reports are items such as net ...
Trading Center