There are two very distinct schools of thought when it comes to deciding who should lead an actively managed mutual fund. Some funds opt for the team approach, touting the performance benefits of having a broad team of managers all working together. Other funds choose to market themselves around one or two "All-Stars," proven market performers who bring star power and name recognition to the fund, guiding the fund with their strong instincts and vision. In this article, we will examine both styles of management, exploring the pros and cons of each style to help you decide which one best fits your investing needs.

SEE: Active Vs. Passive ETF Investing

Team Players
The mutual fund team concept is getting a great deal of attention as the SEC requires mutual fund companies to list more people involved with the investment decision-making process on advertising and regulatory filings. Team-managed funds are required to list each portfolio manager of a fund, as well as the team leader. This change gives shareholders and potential shareholders a greater opportunity to evaluate the backgrounds of more of the people that make a major contribution to a mutual fund.

Fund companies normally post biographies of their portfolio managers on the company website, and some of these companies even post biographies of their contributing analysts. Additionally, funds are now required to disclose a manager's personal stake in the funds that he or she manages, as well as whether he or she manages other portfolios. The new rules are consistent with the current investment climate of full disclosure and have positive implications for investors, since investors can never have enough information.

The most obvious advantage of the team concept is continuity. If one of the team members of a mutual fund leaves the company, the investment process should be able to continue without much of a disruption. Another advantage of the team concept is that people tend to work more closely together, creating a more collegial working environment. The hope is that there will be a diverse range of opinions, which allows managers to consider all options rather than having to rely on a narrower framework.

"Groupthink" is a big hazard for team-player mutual funds. Groupthink occurs when people begin to let the group shape their individual opinions. The group begins to reject concepts that come from outside, and members strive for unanimity above all else. Another disadvantage is that some mutual fund companies are less inclined to provide you with manager and analyst biographies if they market their fund as team-managed. This is especially true for load mutual fund companies. Load companies do not always post detailed information about their portfolio managers or analysts on their websites and their financial advisors may or may not provide similar information to their clients. A paying investor should have the right to access this type of information. However, many investors do not always act in their own best interests or seek the information necessary to make thoughtful investment decisions. Ultimately, the financial advisor serves as the gatekeeper of information.

Some mutual fund companies advertise that only one or two people are primarily responsible for making the investment decisions, especially if the key decision makers have produced excellent results or have very strong investment backgrounds. Years ago, it was common for a mutual fund company to list its chief executive officer as the sole portfolio manager for all of its funds. By any standard, that is quite a bit of work for one individual! To some extent, the "All-Star" concept is a misnomer and more accurately reflects how a fund is marketed, rather than how it is managed. Virtually every All-Star fund has a horde of research analysts who contribute, making the process more of a collaborative effort despite the advertising literature listing only one person as the portfolio manager.

The Mutual Series Funds of the 1980s and 1990s are a good example of the star manager misnomer. Michael Price, the former owner of the Mutual Series Funds, was sometimes listed as the sole portfolio manager of all of its funds. Price was certainly the most accountable among all of the investment professionals at the firm, but he did not do all of the work himself. The Mutual Series Funds had a very talented investment team that played a major role in the success of this company.

It is unlikely that the Mutual Series funds would have been as successful in the 1980s and 1990s without investment professionals such as Jeffrey Altman, Lawrence Sondike, David Winters and Robert Friedman, among others. Essentially, what these funds show is that there are advantages to gain by putting a face to a fund, even if in truth there are many people working behind the scenes.

Accountability and marketability are the primary advantages of the star mutual fund manager approach. Also, when one person is responsible for making nearly all of the tough investment decisions, there is little incentive for the analysts to engage in groupthink. The analysts who support the portfolio manager need only be concerned with selecting the best investments. The star manager system also allows mutual fund companies to market the portfolio manager as well as the mutual fund. Sometimes, it is easier for the average retail investor to relate to a real person rather than an anonymous management team. Also, it is in the manager's best interest to make the fund profitable - after all, his or her reputation is at stake.

If the portfolio manager leaves, there is often a loss of continuity and the potential for shareholder exodus. If the departing all-star was seen as the primary driver behind the fund's success, the future performance of the portfolio could suffer. In addition, if the portfolio manager has attracted a strong investor following, some of the fund's shareholders may decide to sell their shares after learning that their manager has left.

The Bottom Line
Mutual funds vary in terms of their management structures and one size generally does not fit all investors. Some people feel more comfortable with the all-star system because it can be easier to relate to one or two prominent people instead of a mysterious group of managers and analysts. In contrast, the team structure may be a better fit for people who appreciate the continuity that this approach provides when a manager leaves.

Regardless of the approach you take, be it "team" or "all-star," it is important to keep in mind that a managed-fund structure is only as good as the people who support the investment process.

Related Articles
  1. Retirement

    Footnotes: Early Warning Signs For Investors

    These documents hold very important information, but reading them takes skill.
  2. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Should You Follow Your Fund Manager?

    Learn how to tell if a fund in flux is still a suitable investment.
  3. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Mutual Funds Are Awesome - Except When They're Not

    This investment is very popular, but that doesn't mean it comes without risk.
  4. Retirement

    Why It Pays To Be A Lazy Investor

    Be a couch potato! This passive, but diversified, investing strategy could be for you.
  5. Options & Futures

    An Investor's Checklist To Financial Footnotes

    Footnotes to the financial statements contain very important information, but reading them takes skill.
  6. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Active Share Measures Active Management

    A 2006 study proves the effectiveness of a new way of sizing up your portfolio manager.
  7. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Mutual Funds Millennials Should Avoid

    Find out what kinds of mutual funds are unsuitable for millennial investors, especially when included in millennial retirement accounts.
  8. Bonds & Fixed Income

    High Yield Bond Investing 101

    Taking on high-yield bond investments requires a thorough investigation. Here are looking the fundamentals.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Top 3 Commodities Mutual Funds

    Get information about some of the most popular and best-performing mutual funds that are focused on commodity-related investments.
  10. Retirement

    How Robo-Advisors Can Help You and Your Portfolio

    Robo-advisors can add a layer of affordable help and insight to most people's portfolio management efforts, especially as the market continues to mature.
  1. Why have mutual funds become so popular?

    Mutual funds have become an incredibly popular option for a wide variety of investors. This is primarily due to the automatic ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Do mutual funds pay dividends?

    Depending on the specific assets in its portfolio, a mutual fund may generate income for shareholders in the form of capital ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What licenses does a hedge fund manager need to have?

    A hedge fund manager does not necessarily need any specific license to operate a fund, but depending on the type of investments ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Can mutual funds invest in hedge funds?

    Mutual funds are legally allowed to invest in hedge funds. However, hedge funds and mutual funds have striking differences ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What are the risks of annuities in a recession?

    Annuities come in several forms, the two most common being fixed annuities and variable annuities. During a recession, variable ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Do financial advisors get paid by mutual funds?

    Financial advisors are reimbursed by mutual funds in exchange for the investment and financial advice they provide. A financial ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Hot Definitions
  1. Zero-Sum Game

    A situation in which one person’s gain is equivalent to another’s loss, so that the net change in wealth or benefit is zero. ...
  2. Capitalization Rate

    The rate of return on a real estate investment property based on the income that the property is expected to generate.
  3. Gross Profit

    A company's total revenue (equivalent to total sales) minus the cost of goods sold. Gross profit is the profit a company ...
  4. Revenue

    The amount of money that a company actually receives during a specific period, including discounts and deductions for returned ...
  5. Normal Profit

    An economic condition occurring when the difference between a firm’s total revenue and total cost is equal to zero.
  6. Operating Cost

    Expenses associated with the maintenance and administration of a business on a day-to-day basis.
Trading Center
You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!