Since their inception in the 1970s, money markets had been marketed as "safe" investments. This positioning is highlighted in the introductory text to The Money Market tutorial, which states, "If your investments in the stock market are keeping you from sleeping at night, it's time to learn about the safer alternatives in the money market."

The focus on safety and solid returns was justified, as money market funds traditionally maintained a net asset value (NAV) of $1 per share and paid a higher rate of interest than checking accounts. The combination of a stable share price and a good interest rate made them stable places to store cash. This positioning held true until the Reserve Fund broke the buck - a financial services industry phrase used to describe the scenario when a money market fund has its NAVs fall below $1 per share.

While the Reserve Fund's meltdown directly hurt a relatively small number of investors, it revealed that the safety investors had relied on for decades was an illusion. If the Reserve Fund, which had been developed by Bruce Bent (a man often referred to as the "father of the money-fund industry"), couldn't maintain its share price, investors began to wonder which money market fund was safe. (To learn more about the Reserve Fund fiasco, read Money Market Mayhem: The Reserve Fund Meltdown.)

The failure of the Reserve Fund called into question the definition of "safe" and the validity of marketing money market funds as "cash equivalent" investments. It also served as a stark reminder to investors about the importance of understanding their investments.

Rule 2a-7
The Securities And Exchange Commission (SEC) recognized the threat to the financial system that would be caused by a systemic collapse of money market funds and responded with Rule 2a-7. This regulation requires money market funds to restrict their underlying holdings to investments that have more conservative maturities and credit ratings than those previously permitted to be held. From a maturity perspective, the average dollar-weighted portfolio maturity of investments held in a money market fund cannot exceed 60 days. From a credit rating perspective, no more than 3% of assets can be invested in securities that do not fall within the first or second-highest ranking tier.

Increased liquidity requirements are also part of the package. Taxable funds must hold at least 10% of their assets in investments that can be converted into cash within one day. At least 30% of assets must be in investments that can be converted into cash within five business days. No more than 5% of assets can be held in investments that take more than a week to convert into cash.

Funds must undergo stress tests to verify their ability to maintain a stable NAV under adverse conditions, and they are required to track and disclose the NAV based on the market value of underlying holdings and to release that information on a 60-day delay after the end of the reporting period.

Impact to Industry and Investors
The enactment of the legislation had no significant impact on investors. The NAV disclosure requirement has been a non event, as investors must go find the historical information. Fund companies are not required to provide it proactively. Yields on money market funds may be lower than they would be if the funds could invest in more aggressive options, but the difference is only a few basis points. (Learn more in Do Money Market Funds Pay?)

Next Phase
Looking ahead, issues around the NAV and the NAV disclosure requirement are the most troublesome prospects for money market providers and for investors. The SEC is interested is seeing real-time disclosure of NAVs in money market funds and the creation of a privately funded liquidity facility that would provide support to failing funds.

Real-time disclosure would be the next step along the path toward the SEC's goal of instituting a floating NAV for money market funds. Should a floating NAV be enacted, the value of holdings in a money market fund would rise and fall on a daily basis like the holdings in other mutual funds.

The Bottom Line
A floating NAV would likely have a severe dampening affect on the money market fund business. Money market funds appeal to investors because they pay higher rates of interest than checking or savings accounts, and they maintain steady NAV of $1 per share. If the NAV floats, it can drop below the $1 share price, causing investors to lose money. Since the interest rate differential between a money market fund and checking or savings account is generally small, investors would have little incentive to invest in money market funds. (For related information, take a look at Why Money Market Funds Break The Buck.)

Related Articles
  1. Investing

    Five Things to Consider Now for Your 401(k)

    If you can’t stand still, when it comes to checking your 401 (k) balance, focus on these 5 steps to help channel your worries in a more productive manner.
  2. Economics

    Understanding Cash and Cash Equivalents

    Cash and cash equivalents are items that are either physical currency or liquid investments that can be immediately converted into cash.
  3. Professionals

    Index or Target Dates in 401(k)s: Which is Better?

    A common question is whether or not plan participants should choose index or target date funds in a 401(k). The answer depends on different scenarios.
  4. Investing

    6 Reasons Why Every Investor Should Consider ETFs

    Once you understand the benefits of ETFs, you’ll see how they could be an exciting and smart way to help meet your financial goals. Here some key facts.
  5. Term

    What's an Investment Advisor?

    An investment or financial advisor makes investment recommendations and analyzes securities.
  6. Term

    Understanding the Maintenance Margin

    A maintenance margin is the minimum amount of equity that must be kept in a margin account.
  7. Investing News

    Understanding How Mutual Funds Pay Dividends

    The process by which mutual fund dividends are calculated, distributed and reported is fairly straightforward in most cases. Here's a look.
  8. Investing Basics

    Explaining the High-Water Mark

    A high-water mark ensures fund managers are not paid performance fees when they perform poorly.
  9. Investing Basics

    Explaining Front-End Load

    A front-end load is a commission or sales charge paid by the investor at the initial purchase of an investment.
  10. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    What's The Difference Between Bond & Equity ETFs?

    Learn how different stock ETFs and bond ETFs are, though they actually have quite a few things in common.
RELATED TERMS
  1. Equity

    The value of an asset less the value of all liabilities on that ...
  2. Series 6

    A securities license entitling the holder to register as a limited ...
  3. Emergency Banking Act Of 1933

    A bill passed during the administration of former U.S. President ...
  4. Credit Rating

    An assessment of the credit worthiness of a borrower in general ...
  5. Slander

    Slander is the act of harming one person’s reputation by telling ...
  6. Libel

    Libel is publishing a statement about someone in written form ...
RELATED FAQS
  1. What are the disclosure requirements for a private placement?

    The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has set forth disclosure requirements for private placements, including ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What role does the Inspector General play with the Securities and Exchange Commission?

    The inspector general of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) oversees, audits and conducts investigations of ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How long does it take to execute an M&A deal?

    Even the simplest merger and acquisition (M&A) deals are challenging. It takes a lot for two previously independent enterprises ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How is trading volume regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)?

    The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has trading volume as a requirement for selling securities that are otherwise ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Is there a situation in which wash trading is legal?

    Wash trading, the intentional practice of manipulating a stock's activity level to deceive other investors, is not a legal ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What do I do if I think an accountant is in violation of the Generally Accepted Accounting ...

    The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) promulgates generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
×

You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!