The gap between the rich and the lower classes was historically very high before the days of democracy. But the 20th century saw the dawn of a strong middle class in the U.S. and elsewhere, which served to provide a buffer between the poor and the rich and stabilize the domestic economy. But the middle class in America began eroding in the 1970s, and new statistics are revealing that the gap in both income and net worth between the wealthy and the lower classes is now starting to widen exponentially, and the data indicates that this cannot be entirely attributed to mere racial segregation or social injustice. The consequences of this disturbing trend will ultimately have far-reaching economic and demographic effects on our society as time goes on, unless steps are taken to slow or reverse the pattern.

The Rich Vs. the Rest

There are numerous indicators that show that the wealth and income gap in the U.S is now approaching the levels of those of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. From the turn of the century until the Great Depression, the top earners in the U.S. raked in around 20% of the gross national income. This ratio dropped to below 10% in the decades after World War II but began to rise again after 1980, and now once again hovers at or near 20%. In 2010, the wealthiest 6,000 or so households in the U.S. reaped a whopping additional $650 billion (an average of nearly $110 million per household in this group) above and beyond what they would have earned if the income for domestic households was still allocated according to the 1980 ratio. And a study of tax data supplied by the IRS shows that the top 1% of households earned just over half of all gains in income between 1993 and 2008. Another telling indicator is the Gini index, which was developed by Italian statistician Corrado Gini in 1912. This variable ranks income inequality on a scale from 0 to 1, where 0 represents a society where everyone in a society receives an equal share of income, and 1 equates to a single person in a society receiving 100% of all income earned. The U.S. stood at 0.35 on this scale in 1965, but its current score has risen to 0.44, which is on a par with countries such as Russia and Sri Lanka. A growing number of financial experts are lamenting this unfortunate trend. James Chanos, a respected money manager and the president of Kynikos Associates in New York told Bloomberg radio in a recent interview that “Income inequality in this country is just getting worse and worse and worse, and that is not a recipe for stable economic growth when the rich are getting richer and everybody else is being left behind.”

Corporate Inequality

The increase in this income disparity is perhaps most clearly illustrated in the vast differences between the compensation of the CEOs of many major U.S. corporations and their rank-and-file workers. A recent study by NerdWallet based on data from proxy statements and governmental data revealed that the average CEO earned about 550 times as much as an average employee and received a pension equal to about 239 times the amount paid to the average employee. Some companies are much worse; the study shows that Mike Duke, the CEO of Walmart, one of the chief offenders on this list, has a retirement plan that is approximately 6,000 times the size of a retail store employee and rakes in close to $21 million per year in total compensation, which is equal to 836 times the average store employee’s earnings and 305 times the average store manager’s earnings. But even this discrepancy is dwarfed by that of Oracle, which has a CEO bringing in a whopping $80 million annually. The following table provides a breakdown of some of the earnings statistics for some major corporations and their CEOs versus their average workers.

Source: CNBC / Nerdwallet Note

What Does the Future Hold?

Of course, many of the employees at these companies are unaware of the magnitude of the discrepancy in compensation between themselves and their corporate leaders. But that will change in 2014 when a law passed by Congress in 2010 will go into effect requiring corporations to disseminate the pay of both the CEO and an average employee. Of course, this may have an impact on employee morale and productivity, which could in turn affect investor sentiment. But the Great Recession has left employers with uncertain cash flows and reduced balanced sheets, and they are increasingly rewarding employees according to their performance in an effort to spend their money most efficiently. But this is also effectively helping to further the division in compensation between more and less productive workers.

Increased awareness of pay inequality also isn’t going to resolve many of the key consequences of the growing wealth gap in America. Economic inequality has historically bred more crime, greater racial and ethnic divisions, and an increased load on the healthcare system due to physical and mental afflictions of the poor. Politicians must cater to voters who have some interest in what happens in their communities and preserving what they have. This means that potential voters in poor communities are often overlooked, and most of them have no motivation to vote or become involved in their communities, because they are preoccupied with daily survival. Therefore, they are unable to put someone in office who will look out for their interests, which will, of course, only make life harder for them. And if nothing is done to curb the growth in the inequality gap, it could ultimately lead to weak long-term returns in the markets and a less stable economy and social structure, as societies with narrower gaps between the rich and poor enjoy greater economic growth.

The Bottom Line

The continually widening gap in wealth and income between the rich and everyone else is becoming an issue of increasing concern for both political and economic pundits. Economists can look to history and see what happens when a country is ruled by a tiny elite and the rest of the people live in poverty. King Louis the 16th of France and Czar Nicholas II are two examples of rulers who were executed because of their refusal and inability to meet the basic needs of their people. Such extremes aren’t likely in modern times, but Americans may need to threaten the political lives of our current leaders to spur the economic reform needed to redistribute the nation’s wealth.w stands above 9% in the U.S. despite record corporate profits. Although we may not be on the verge of another revolution, Washington will need to address this trend sooner or later if it does not wish to see history eventually repeat itself.

Related Articles
  1. Personal Finance

    Executive Pay: How Much Do Shareholders Really Care?

    How much do shareholders - or the public - really care about executive pay? A new SEC proposal may be aimed at finding out.
  2. Personal Finance

    Which Income Class Are You?

    This article identifies the various income classes in America. Find out which class you fall under.
  3. Professionals

    Is Your High-Profile Job Worth The Price?

    Certain careers can be prestigious and lucrative, but there are always costs. Find out if they're worth it.
  4. Personal Finance

    5 Things You May Not Know About CEO Pay

    These CEOs have discovered a recession-proof financial strategy, but it's one they'd rather you don't know about.
  5. Retirement

    A Bigger Salary Or Better Benefits?

    Total compensation is not limited to salary. Find out what else you should consider.
  6. Personal Finance

    10 Reasons It Is Time to Look for a New Job

    Learn 10 good reasons for switching jobs, such as major life changes, ethical concerns, job description creep and upwards mobility.
  7. Economics

    How Bitcoin Helps People Bypass Government Currency Control

    Bitcoin has helped ordinary citizens in some countries bypass government controls over free exchange conversions.
  8. Economics

    What Bitcoin Regulations Look Like Around The World

    Bitcoin is still so new that countries are struggling to make legislation catch up with technology. Some nations are more open to virtual currency than others.
  9. Markets

    Hillary Clinton Promises Free College and Higher Wages

    With income inequality on the rise, Hillary Clinton is running on raising the minimum wage, raising middle class wages, and providing free or low-cost college education.
  10. Economics

    How a Monopoly Works

    In economics, a monopoly occurs when one company is the sole (or nearly sole) provider of a good or service within an industry. This potentially allows that company to become powerful enough ...
  1. How do mutual fund managers make money?

    Mutual fund managers get base salaries, which vary greatly depending on the size and pedigree of the fund company. They may ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Does working capital include salaries?

    A company accrues unpaid salaries on its balance sheet as part of accounts payable, which is a current liability account, ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Do financial advisors need to meet quotas?

    Most financial advisors are required to meet quotas, particularly if they work for firms that pay base salaries or draws ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. What are the disclosure requirements for a private placement?

    The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has set forth disclosure requirements for private placements, including ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. How is trading volume regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)?

    The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has trading volume as a requirement for selling securities that are otherwise ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Has deregulation helped or hurt the profitability of companies in the telecommunications ...

    Deregulation is almost always a double-edged sword in terms of business profitability. The profits of legally protected monopolies ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Hot Definitions
  1. Barefoot Pilgrim

    A slang term for an unsophisticated investor who loses all of his or her wealth by trading equities in the stock market. ...
  2. Quick Ratio

    The quick ratio is an indicator of a company’s short-term liquidity. The quick ratio measures a company’s ability to meet ...
  3. Black Tuesday

    October 29, 1929, when the DJIA fell 12% - one of the largest one-day drops in stock market history. More than 16 million ...
  4. Black Monday

    October 19, 1987, when the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) lost almost 22% in a single day. That event marked the beginning ...
  5. Monetary Policy

    Monetary policy is the actions of a central bank, currency board or other regulatory committee that determine the size and ...
  6. Indemnity

    Indemnity is compensation for damages or loss. Indemnity in the legal sense may also refer to an exemption from liability ...
Trading Center