For prospective parents, weighing the decision to have children has not gotten any easier. According to a 2008 study by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), parents who grossed at least $56,870 a year spend a total $291,570 to raise a child to the age of 18.
In the U.K., the cost of raising a child to the age of 21 outside of expensive London is estimated to be about £180,000 (about US$297,000), according to a 2006 survey by the Liverpool Victoria Society. The financial dilemma, therefore, is similar for many developed countries. If household incomes were unlimited, the decision to raise children might be a strictly personal choice. In reality, however, the decision to have children is also a financial one. In this article, we'll provide some food for thought from the financial side of the equation.
If $291.570 sounds like a lot of money to you, consider that the statistics cited in the study are actually lower than the cost of raising a child because they are based on the cost of raising the younger child in a household that consists of two adults and two children. To estimate the cost of raising an only child, all expenses should be multiplied by 1.25. (For further reading, see Don't Forget The Kids: Save For Their Education And Retirement and Investing In Your Child's Education.)
|Family Income||Family with Two Children||Only Child|
|Up to $56,870||$210,340||$262,925|
|$56,870 to $98,470||$291,570||$364,462|
|Figure 1: The cost of raising a child to the age of 18 for different income classes in two-parent families
Source: Expenditures On Children By Families (2008), USDA.
Figure 2 shows the breakdown of the average expenses for a two-child family earning more than $56,870 per year. Where does all the money go? These are the major expenses cited in the USDA study:
|Childcare and Education||16%|
|Figure 2: A breakdown of the average child-raising expenses for the younger child of a two-child family.
Source: Expenditures On Children By Families (2008), USDA.
Of course, the old adage "the more you make, the more you spend" certainly applies to child rearing. Families earning a higher pretax income spend considerably less to raise a child to age 18. Lower-income families spend less to raise their children because they are financially unable to offer them the same amenities available to higher-income earners.
Being a "DINK"
Families that consist of two working adults and no children (also known as dual income with no kids, or DINKS) are sometimes stereotyped as hedonists or are decried by child-rearing families as shirking their moral imperative to procreate. Righteous indignation aside, a quick reality check will help us focus strictly on the economic aspects of the child/no child decision.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, traditional families - defined as a married couple with children - represented 26.3% of the U.S. population in 1990. By 2002, that number had declined to 23.6%. It fell again in 2007, to 22.5%. A similar trend can be seen in England and elsewhere in the industrialized world.
The Economics of Family
Economics quite obviously plays a role in the decline of traditional families. People are waiting longer to get married and are having fewer children, in part because life is becoming increasingly expensive. (To read more about weddings, see Revealing The Hidden Costs Of Weddings.)
Young couples also face the financial challenges of paying off student loans while paying for other living expenses such as rent/mortgage, car payments, food, clothing, utilities, and saving for retirement. (See Delay In Savings Raises Payments Later On and The Indiana Jones Guide To Getting Ahead.)
No Kids? Why Get Married?
Love and affection aside, coupledom provides greater financial stability than going it alone. When both people work, all but the most foolhardy couples enjoy significantly greater financial benefits than other families. So, smart couples can leverage marriage to increase income and decrease expenses. Instead of making two rent or mortgage payments, these couples make one. Likewise, most utility bills have a minimum payment that would be higher if the couple was living apart than the incremental increase in living together. The most financially savvy couples live on one income and save the rest. They usually have two employers from which to choose health plans and won't have to worry about bankruptcy if one income earner is temporarily unemployed.
Economically speaking, the absence of children results in lower fixed expenses. It also results in more money to spend. Regardless of your feelings about children, the bottom line is that you can do a lot of nice things for yourself, your spouse and your finances with the hunreds of thousands of dollars that it takes to raise a child to age 18.
Conclusion - Kids or No Kids?
Economic reality forces tough choices. The decision to have children is a politically sensitive topic; those who have children abhor the cold economic reality that DINKS factor into their equation, while some DINKS maintain the view that unchecked population growth contributes to environmental strain. In the end, having children is still a deeply personal and challenging choice - just remember to add the financial implications of raising children into the equation. You need to review your personal situation and make the choices that are right for you and your family, whether it will consist of two people or 10.
InsuranceLearn several effective methods for lowering life insurance premiums. These include quitting smoking and considering term life insurance.
BudgetingObtain information on how to put together and execute a plan to get out of debt, including the various steps and methods people use to become debt-free.
EconomicsIn the space of a week, the VIX Index, a measure of market volatility, spiked from 13, suggesting extreme complacency, to over 50, evidencing total panic.
Mutual Funds & ETFsLearn what mutual funds will perform best if interest rates rise. Interest rates can rise due to inflation or to an improving economy.
TaxesMost of the time, it makes sense for couples to file their taxes jointly. Except for these possible exceptions...
EconomicsConsumers incur switching costs when they receive a monetary or other type of penalty for changing a supplier, brand or product.
InvestingEven as job growth has surged and gasoline prices have plunged, U.S. consumers are proving slow to respond and repair their overextended balance sheets.
SavingsThose school-supply lists just keep getting longer each year. Here's how to shop smart.
EconomicsMarket penetration is the measure of how much a good or service is being used within a total potential market.
EconomicsThe marginal rate of substitution determines how much of one good a consumer will give up to obtain extra units of another good.
A type of accounting process that aims to capture a company's ...
A metric used in capital budgeting measuring the profitability ...
Goods that international travelers can purchase without paying ...
A dubious business practice that involves supplying a typically ...
A monthly statistical report from the U.S. Federal Reserve that ...
A legal theory that guides how property acquired during the course ...
Japan is not an emerging market economy. Emerging market economies are characterized by low per capita incomes, poor infrastructure ... Read Full Answer >>
Social Security payments are not included in the U.S. definition of the gross domestic product (GDP). Transfer Payments For ... Read Full Answer >>
Social Security spousal benefits are partial retirement or disability benefits granted to the spouses of qualifying taxpayers. Qualifying ... Read Full Answer >>
The amount of Social Security benefit you are eligible to collect upon retirement is not affected by marriage. Your benefit ... Read Full Answer >>
Discretionary income is the money left over from your gross income each month after taking out taxes and paying for necessities. ... Read Full Answer >>
The unemployment rate and Consumer Confidence Index (CCI) rank as two of the most important economic indicators to consider ... Read Full Answer >>