A significant amount of attention has been generated by a recent announcement that financial advisors in the United Kingdom and Australia will be legally required to stop charging commissions and adopt a fee-for service model. This transition has even been referred to as “the most significant change taking place in the global financial services industry…"

With two developed, sophisticated nations adopting such a firm anti-commission stance, questions have arisen over whether or not the United States should follow suit and enact similar legislation. What many news stories don't mention is that that United States did explore fee-based compensation and, for some accounts, regulators actually chose to ban that method of compensation in favor of commissions. Of course, that decision did not affect all fee-based relationships, and punditry aside, the truth is that investors in the United States have had the option to enter into fee-only relationships for decades. Still, today, neither investors nor regulators seem inclined to do away with commission-based relationships.

Different Service Models for Different Needs
The popular mass-media argument of fees versus commission is an overly simplified evaluation of a complex topic. Financial professionals provide a service to their clients; in exchange, they are paid for that service. There are a variety of potential payment arrangements: a sales commission may be charged on each product sold, or an hourly fee may be charged for each hour of service. Sometimes compensation is calculated via a flat fee based on a percentage of the assets under management; a combination of fees and commissions is yet another option.

Commissions: The Bad Reputation Is Unfair
The popular press often presents commission-based compensation as an unethical practice that rewards advisors for engaging their clients in active trading, even if this investing style isn't suitable for those clients. The argument is based on the idea that investment brokers increase their commissions by encouraging investors to make unnecessary and excessive trades. This practice, known as churning, is unethical because the excessive buying and selling keeps a portfolio constantly in flux, with the primary purpose of lining the advisor's pockets. Fee-based compensation is touted as a better solution because the broker earns a fee for providing investment advice and is, therefore, not motivated by the frequency of a client's trades.

On the surface, the argument sounds noble; however, if you look beyond the surface, the argument loses its strength. First and foremost, the argument assumes that investors are completely clueless. These investors are supposedly willing to blindly trust a broker as the broker churns their account, earning commissions without generating any profits for the investor. In reality, even the least intelligent investors are likely to notice an ever-changing portfolio that never makes any money.

Interestingly, fee-based brokerage accounts were sold in the Unites States prior to October of 2010. They were designed as the antidote for churning, because investors could make as many trades as they wanted without paying commissions. The Unites States banned these accounts, forcing the financial services industry to close them. The ruling was based on technical definitions of "advice" and a variety of similar factors that many argue had little to do with the practical realities of investing.

Still, picture yourself at age 80, having $4 million in dividend-paying stocks and interest-bearing bonds that you have held for the past 20 years in a fee-based brokerage account. They have generated a nice income for you; they have also paid your financial advisor $40,000 per year, each and every year, if you have been paying a 1% fee. That's $800,000 in fees over the course of two decades. A commission-based relationship would have generated the exact same investment results at a fraction of the first-year's cost. You would likely have kept the overwhelming majority of that fee had you paid commissions or an hourly fee, even if it took dozens of trades to build your portfolio.

The argument against commissions discounts all of the potential value that comes with the advice to make a trade. At large brokerage firms, there are teams of analysts that research securities. The investment advisors themselves spend time and effort to learn about these securities and have the skills and experience to match investors with appropriate investments. At some firms, the investment advisors themselves research securities and make recommendations.

Before you dismiss this as the infamous “lipstick on a pig," spend some time seeking income-producing investments for your portfolio in a low-yielding interest rate environment. Solutions such as preferred securities, unsecured bonds, annuities and limited partnerships are not likely to come to mind as you scramble to find ways to turn your nest egg into an income stream. These sophisticated investments are not often found by investors, they are researched by professionals and generally sold by them. Talk to a good commission-based broker, and for a modest one-time commission, your nest egg could be delivering the payment steam you are seeking.

It's also worth thinking about the 1% yearly fee you would be paying a fee-based broker every year for the rest of your life to get the exact same advice. The first year's fee alone could be many times more expensive that the one-time commission that you paid. Over 20 years, the $250 commission you paid could look like the deal of a lifetime.

Fees Have Their Place
All of that noted, fee-based relationships are the right choice for some investors. Investors that need a lot of assistance on an ongoing basis may be perfectly comfortable paying for that advice via ongoing fees. After all, they want advice and their advisor has an incentive to grow their clients' assets because the advisor's fee will increase as the value of the portfolio rises.

Just keep in mind that the end result could be a payment of 1% a year for 20 years, despite making zero trades. Such an arrangement might be a complete rip off if you never speak to your advisor during that time. Or it might be a real bargain if your advisor's recommendations are what keep you from buying high and selling low while you generate a nest egg large enough to provide for your retirement needs.

An Educated Investor Makes Better Decisions
Arguments in favor of fee-based accounts sound fantastic to the uninformed, but there are two sides to every story, and investing is a complex endeavor with a wide range of investors, each with unique needs. A compensation system that would be a big mistake for one investor might be perfect for another.

As an investor, you have the freedom to decide which type of compensation relationship is right for you. Before agreeing to any payment arrangement, take the time to carefully consider your situation. Think about your personality. Are you a "set it and forget it" type of person, or do you want to have ongoing discussions about your financial needs and various ways to address those needs? Match your needs to the type of advice you are getting. Make your decision based on your personal needs, not rhetoric, and you likely be far more satisfied with the resulting arrangement and cost schedule. In turn, you are more likely to stick with the resulting investment plan, therefore increasing the odds of achieving your financial goals.

Related Articles
  1. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Are Vanguard ETF Fees Competitive?

    Find out if Vanguard is still a leading low-cost ETF provider, and why investors should care about operating expenses as much as commissions.
  2. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: SPDR S&P Oil & Gas

    Discover the investment strategy behind SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration and Production ETF, and learn what type of investor may find it suitable.
  3. Home & Auto

    Cut Commissions With "For Sale By Owner" Sales

    It takes a lot more work, but selling your home without a realtor can have benefits.
  4. Personal Finance

    Charles Schwab Announces Commission-Free ETF Trading

    Here's what the Schwab ETF OneSource will mean to the average investor's portfolio and the potential decrease in costs for purchasing ETFs.
  5. Investing Basics

    Paying Your Investment Advisor - Fees Or Commissions?

    The way a professional is compensated can affect quality of service. Learn more here.
  6. Home & Auto

    How To Negotiate A Real Estate Agent's Commission

    If you're looking to save some money when selling your home, negotiating your agent's commission is a good way to do it.
  7. Brokers

    The Sales Commission Dilemma

    These professionals' interests may not always align with your own. Find out how to protect yourself.
  8. Professionals

    Top Tips for Improving Client Communications

    Effective communication with your clients is the lifeblood of your financial advisory business. If you've struggled in this area, pay heed to these tips.
  9. Investing Basics

    Do You Need More Than One Financial Advisor?

    Using more than one financial advisor for money management has its pros and cons.
  10. Investing News

    Silicon Valley Startups Fly into Space

    Space enthusiasts are in for an exciting time as Silicon Valley startups take on the lucrative but expensive final frontier.
  1. What action is the SEC likely to take on 12b-1 fees?

    The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may take action to impose greater regulation on how 12b-1 fees are used, or ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. How liquid are Vanguard mutual funds?

    The Vanguard mutual fund family is one of the largest and most well-recognized fund family in the financial industry. Its ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Do financial advisors charge VATs?

    The Personal Finance Society (PFS) and with Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have outlined when a value-added tax ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How do mutual funds work in India?

    Mutual funds in India work in much the same way as mutual funds in the United States. Like their American counterparts, Indian ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Are UTMA accounts escheatable?

    Like most financial assets held by institutions such as banks and investment firms, UTMA accounts can be escheated by state ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What are the dormancy and escheatment rules for stock accounts?

    While the specific dormancy and escheatment rules for stock accounts vary by state, all states provide for the escheatment ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Hot Definitions
  1. Barefoot Pilgrim

    A slang term for an unsophisticated investor who loses all of his or her wealth by trading equities in the stock market. ...
  2. Quick Ratio

    The quick ratio is an indicator of a company’s short-term liquidity. The quick ratio measures a company’s ability to meet ...
  3. Black Tuesday

    October 29, 1929, when the DJIA fell 12% - one of the largest one-day drops in stock market history. More than 16 million ...
  4. Black Monday

    October 19, 1987, when the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) lost almost 22% in a single day. That event marked the beginning ...
  5. Monetary Policy

    Monetary policy is the actions of a central bank, currency board or other regulatory committee that determine the size and ...
  6. Indemnity

    Indemnity is compensation for damages or loss. Indemnity in the legal sense may also refer to an exemption from liability ...
Trading Center