Congratulations, you've made it to retirement! Hopefully you've planned appropriately, saved enough money and are prepared to start living off your savings. Unfortunately, it is common to find that retirees are unprepared for the distribution phase of retirement. They have spent their working lives focusing on the accumulation phase. They've contributed to IRAs, participated in their employer-provided retirement plans and saved. Often it's not until right before they retire that they consider how to create and receive their income.

This article will address some of the basics of retirement income distribution plans. We will address three methods using a standardized 4% cash flow rate. Two of the methods are well known; the third, not so much. They are all viable methods; it is a retiree's personal circumstances that should determine which method, or combination of methods, are used. (For a background reading, see our Retirement Planning Tutorial.)

Live on 4?!
Some of you may be thinking "4%? I can't live on 4%!" In some cases, this may be true, as the generally accepted rate of sustainable inflation-adjusted cash flow in retirement is 4%. Therefore, retirees should seek the counsel of a retirement income planning specialist prior to implementing any of these plans, but especially if their cash flow need is greater than 4%. Remember, the higher the cash flow, the higher the annual return on investments will need to be.

  1. Interest-Only
    With an interest-only plan, a retiree with $1 million and an income need of $40,000 per year might invest her money in a portfolio of fixed income securities with an average yield of 4% and use the interest as her retirement income. This approach works fine as long as there is no inflation and the investor needs nothing more than $40,000 per year. Assuming a 3% inflation rate, the investor would need nearly $54,000.00 in year 10 to maintain the same lifestyle. At a 4% average yield, she would be forced to sell part of her portfolio or reduce her standard of living. If she chose to sell, she would reduce her principal and therefore her income. She might also be forced to sell every year thereafter, putting her on the road to asset depletion.

    The interest-only option works best for investors with excess savings. For example, an investor with $2 million and an income need of $40,000.00 has little to worry about when it comes to running out of money. (For ideas on how to beat inflation, see Curbing The Effects Of Inflation.)

  2. Systematic Withdrawal Plan (SWP)
    A systematic withdrawal plan provides more flexibility than the interest-only option, but less predictability. However, an SWP can provide growth. With an SWP, a retiree might invest in an array of stock, bond and money market mutual funds (or individual securities). Money is withdrawn periodically (most commonly monthly) from all funds proportionately or from specific positions if specified. The amount of "income" (interest, dividends and/or capital gains) is determined by the performance of the investments. Good performance can translate into surplus income and the possibility of growing the portfolio; bad performance can result in depletion.

    With this system, the allocation of assets should be one where the return can reasonably be expected to meet or exceed the retiree's cash flow need. Our investor might invest in a generic "balanced" allocation (50% equities, 40% bonds, 10% short term) and expect the historical average return of such a portfolio - 7.85% according to a survey of returns between 1926 and 2008 conducted by Fidelity Investments. If the retiree in our example were to achieve this return every year, she might be able to maintain her lifestyle, including inflation, indefinitely. Of course this is easier said than done, as the 7.85% figure represents a long-term average, and actual returns can vary widely over time.

    If the retiree retired in 2007, her portfolio might have declined significantly in 2008 and 2009. Assuming a 20% decline in value and her $40,000 withdrawal, she may have found herself with a portfolio worth $760,000 ($1 million - $200,000 - $40,000.00) in 2009. Her annual withdrawal percentage is then 5.26% ($40,000.00/$760,000) of the portfolio and the probability of her money lasting the rest of her life decreases. The inverse could have been true had she retired at the market bottom in 2002 and grown her portfolio in the first few years of her distributions. This is because what happens in the early years of your retirement has the greatest influence on your long-term results. When using this type of strategy, the averages don't matter so much; what matters is what you earn each year.

  3. Spend Down/Grow Back - The Two Headed Beast
    A spend down/grow back strategy is quite simple in concept but can be complex in execution. Let's look at the basic form of this plan, which is often referred to as the "two-headed beast". The beast will grow more heads as a situation merits. The two-headed beast is created by separating your portfolio into two components: the money you are spending and the money you are growing.

    The component for spending is money that you are intentionally depleting over a predetermined period of time; the money you are growing is intended to replace the income component at the end of the period. You can use any period, but the shorter the time frame the greater the risk.

    Let's use 10 years. We will split our retiree's portfolio in two. The retiree will put $400,000 into a 0% interest checking account and will spend it over the next 10 years. Therefore, the remaining $600,000 needs to grow back to $1 million over those 10 years to replace what she spends (ignoring inflation). In this case, the retiree will need an annual return of 5.25% for 10 years to get back to $1 million.

    If, instead of a 0% checking account, she invests the income component at 4% interest for the 10 years, she wouldn't need $400,000, she would need the present value of $40,000 per year over 10 years at 4%. That would be about $337,500.00, leaving $662,500. Bringing the investment back to $1 million would then require an annual return of 4.20%. The balanced allocation mentioned earlier could be used and the average would have more relevance. This is because the investment is more likely to average 7.85% over a 10-year period than to earn 7.85% each year. With that average, the retiree should be able to maintain her inflation-adjusted lifestyle. At the end of the decade, she would repeat the process. (To learn more, read Understanding The Time Value Of Money.)

Of all of the methods we went through, the interest-only method provides the greatest predictability, while systematic withdrawal plans provide the greatest potential for growth (or declines) and flexibility. The spend down/grow back strategies (the multi-headed beast) provide elements of both, with a predictable stream of income, the potential for growth and a predetermined time frame over which to plan for that growth.

All three methods have merit, but all three methods also require monitoring. The method you use depends on how much money you have, how much income you need, whether you care to try to grow the portfolio and whether you care to leave any money behind for your heirs, among other things. For investors who don't mind depleting some of, or their entire, portfolios the numbers would be very different. See your financial adviser for more on retirement income planning. (To learn more, check out Systematic Withdrawal Of Retirement Income.)

Related Articles
  1. Retirement

    Suddenly Pushed into Retirement, How to Handle the Transition

    Adjusting to retirement can be challenging, but when it happens unexpectedly it can be downright difficult. Thankfully there are ways to successfully transition.
  2. Investing

    What a Family Tradition Taught Me About Investing

    We share some lessons from friends and family on saving money and planning for retirement.
  3. Retirement

    Two Heads Are Better Than One With Your Finances

    We discuss the advantages of seeking professional help when it comes to managing our retirement account.
  4. Retirement

    Is Working Longer A Viable Retirement Plan?

    Fully funding someone’s life for three decades without work is tricky. The result is retirement has become, for many, a 30-year adventure.
  5. Retirement

    How a 401(k) Works After Retirement

    Find out how your 401(k) works after you retire, including when you are required to begin taking distributions and the tax impact of your withdrawals.
  6. Personal Finance

    How the Social Security Reboot May Affect You

    While there’s still potential for some “tweaking” around your Social Security retirement benefits, I’d like to share some insight on what we know now.
  7. Retirement

    4 Books Every Retiree Should Read

    Learn more about the current financial situations retirees are facing and discover four books that every prospective and current retiree must read.
  8. Investing Basics

    Do You Need More Than One Financial Advisor?

    Using more than one financial advisor for money management has its pros and cons.
  9. Retirement

    Should Social Security Be Privatized?

    The idea of controlling your own retirement money is one that continues to hold appeal for a large segment of voters.
  10. Insurance

    What's The Difference Between Medicare And Medicaid?

    One program is for the poor; the other is for the elderly. Learn which is which.
  1. Can a 401(k) be taken in bankruptcy?

    The two most common types of bankruptcy available to consumers are Chapter 7 and Chapter 13. Whether you file a Chapter 7 ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. When can catch-up contributions start?

    Most qualified retirement plans such as 401(k), 403(b) and SIMPLE 401(k) plans, as well as individual retirement accounts ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Who can make catch-up contributions?

    Most common retirement plans such as 401(k) and 403(b) plans, as well as individual retirement accounts (IRAs) allow you ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Can you have both a 401(k) and an IRA?

    Investors can have both a 401(k) and an individual retirement account (IRA) at the same time, and it is quite common to have ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Are 401(k) contributions tax deductible?

    All contributions to qualified retirement plans such as 401(k)s reduce taxable income, which lowers the total taxes owed. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Are 401(k) rollovers taxable?

    401(k) rollovers are generally not taxable as long as the money goes into another qualifying plan, an individual retirement ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center