Stocks are commonly touted as being safe (real returns greater than 0) over the long run. If you look only at the United States over the past century, this has been the case for any period greater than 20 years. However, in many other countries, stocks needed to be held for a much longer period in order for this statement to hold true. Furthermore, social and economic conditions in the U.S. today are very different from those at the beginning of the last century. In the future, the U.S. may have more difficulty claiming that stocks are safe over the long run - an issue that has important implications for building portfolios in the twenty-first century. In this article, we examine the reasons behind this change and discuss what it means for the equity premium (defined as equity return - cash return). (For further reading, see The Equity Risk Premium - Part 1 and Part 2.)

The U.S. and Uncommon Returns
All too often, investors look at historical U.S. returns as a gauge for future returns. Given that the U.S. saw the largest economic and market growth of any country in the twentieth century, this might not be a prudent strategy, as countries, just like sectors, eventually rotate in and out of favor. Because of its success, however, the U.S. has been the most researched market; more long-term quality financial data exists on it than on any other market. This resulting success bias has strongly influenced investors' projected returns. The bull market of 1982 to 2000 also had an effect on investors' expectations, but given that it was the greatest combined bull market (equities and fixed income) in history, it may be difficult to repeat any time soon. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, valuation levels on stocks were higher and, therefore, not as compelling as they were at the start of the previous century, and investors hurt during the last bubble may be much less likely to pay such high premiums in the future. (For background info, read Digging Deeper Into Bull And Bear Markets.)

Other countries did not share the unprecedented degree of success enjoyed by the U.S. over the twentieth century. According to Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh and Mike Staunton in their book "Triumph Of The Optimists: 101 Years Of Global Investment Returns" (2002), the U.S. has seen positive real equity returns for every 20-year period in the last century. The same cannot be said for many other markets; countries such as Japan, France and Italy required 50 to 75 years before the same statement could hold true, while the markets of Russia, China and Germany saw total collapse through confiscation, nationalization and hyperinflation in the same period. (See What Is An Emerging Market Economy?) Even though these countries were ravaged by events that were no longer common at the beginning of the twenty-first century, we can't assume that a future global catastrophe (i.e. war, depression or pandemic) could not seriously disrupt the world markets again. (For insight, read The Biggest Market Crashes In History.)

The graph below charts the relative risk and return for various countries in the twentieth century:


It All Comes Down to the Equity Premium
Considering the historical information, what will happen to the equity premium going forward? A strong case can be made for a lower equity premium in the future. Valuations for stocks in the twenty-first century, which far exceed those that existed at the beginning of the last century, provide some evidence of this. For instance, according to Dimson, Marsh and Staunton, the global dividend yield in 1900 was 4.5% - very different from the 1.5% recorded at the end of 2005. Although some of this can be attributed to a shift away from dividend-paying companies, this difference in valuation could explain the high equity premiums realized in the last century, as higher valuations worked their way into those returns. There is also the possibility that valuations could creep back to the lower, historical levels, which would be devastating for future returns.

Statistically, sampling errors exist when return data is limited to only 100 years. For example, there are only five non-overlapping 20-year periods sampled over the last century, and because the data only accounts for one 100-year period, there is no other data to which we can compare it. In other words, 100 years' worth of data may not be enough to be statistically confident about the predictive use of long-term returns from the last century. Finally, proceeding with a lower equity premium and the same historical amount of volatility will mean longer periods before stocks can be considered safe over the long run.

According to Dimson, Marsh and Staunton, the equity premium in the second half of the twentieth century was twice that of the first half. The post-war years saw unprecedented growth and trade in the global economy, while central bankers came to better understand the intricacies of monetary policy. During this time, global investing was a true "free lunch", where you could pick up additional return with little additional risk. This was due to the poor correlation of financial market returns. The financial markets and the world economy were not as integrated as they are today; this has changed dramatically since the 1970s, and global market returns have become more closely correlated. Therefore, this "free lunch" may be harder to realize now. (For further reading see, Broadening The Borders Of Your Portfolio and Investing Beyond Your Borders.)

Some argue that long-term equity returns can even be more certain than bond returns. According to Peter L. Bernstein in his article "What Rate Of Return Can You Reasonably Expect ... Or What Can The Long Run Tell Us About The Short Run?" (1997), stock market returns are historically mean reverting (returns ultimately coming back to their long-run averages), while bonds have not been mean reverting on either a nominal or a real basis. For example, the bond market in the twentieth century was basically two secular bull markets and bear markets - there was no mean reversion about it.

Despite this argument, the yields on inflation-protected securities (another basis for calculating equity premium) were actually dramatically compressed at the beginning of this century, as a glut of global savings resonated throughout the world. Since that time, the world has generally become a much safer place to invest. Shouldn't this relative safety be reflected in lower equity premiums required by investors? At any rate, it certainly helps to explain the increase in valuations in the last half of the twentieth century.

Assuming a lower equity premium in the future, people will need to change the way they invest. Personal savings will have to increase to offset lower real returns and real assets may offer a more viable alternative to financial assets. Finally, sector and stock selection will become even more important.

In terms of market returns, the twentieth century was more favorable to the U.S. than to most other countries. For these countries, the risk-return tradeoff for stocks has not been as attractive, and it is more difficult for them to make well-supported claims about the success of holding stocks long term. The conditions that existed for the U.S. at the beginning of the last century did not exist at the beginning of this century. This may mean a lower equity premium, requiring changes to how much you save and how you invest your money.

To read more, see The Stock Market: A Look Back.

Related Articles
  1. Investing

    How ETFs May Save You Thousands

    Being vigilant about the amount you pay and what you get for is important, but adding ETFs into the investment mix fits well with a value-seeking nature.
  2. Stock Analysis

    The Biggest Risks of Investing in Netflix Stock

    Examine the current state of Netflix Inc., and learn about three of the major fundamental risks that the company is currently facing.
  3. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    3 Fixed Income ETFs in the Mining Sector

    Learn about the top three metals and mining exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and explore analyses of their characteristics and how investors can benefit from these ETFs.
  4. Bonds & Fixed Income

    High Yield Bond Investing 101

    Taking on high-yield bond investments requires a thorough investigation. Here are looking the fundamentals.
  5. Retirement

    How Robo-Advisors Can Help You and Your Portfolio

    Robo-advisors can add a layer of affordable help and insight to most people's portfolio management efforts, especially as the market continues to mature.
  6. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Top 3 Muni California Mutual Funds

    Discover analyses of the top three California municipal bond mutual funds, and learn about their characteristics, historical performance and suitability.
  7. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Mutual Funds Are Not FDIC Insured: Here Is Why

    Find out why mutual funds are not insured by the FDIC, including why the FDIC was created and how to minimize your risk with educated mutual fund investments.
  8. Professionals

    How to Sell Mutual Funds to Your Clients

    Learn about the various talking points you should cover when discussing mutual funds with clients and how explaining their benefits can help you close the sale.
  9. Professionals

    Fund and ETF Strategies for Volatile Markets

    Looking for short-term fixes in reaction to market volatility? Here are a few strategies — and their downsides.
  10. Investing

    How Diversifying Can Help You Manage Market Mayhem

    The recent market volatility, while not unexpected, has certainly been hard for any investor to digest.
  1. Why have mutual funds become so popular?

    Mutual funds have become an incredibly popular option for a wide variety of investors. This is primarily due to the automatic ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What licenses does a hedge fund manager need to have?

    A hedge fund manager does not necessarily need any specific license to operate a fund, but depending on the type of investments ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Can mutual funds invest in hedge funds?

    Mutual funds are legally allowed to invest in hedge funds. However, hedge funds and mutual funds have striking differences ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. When are mutual funds considered a bad investment?

    Mutual funds are considered a bad investment when investors consider certain negative factors to be important, such as high ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What fees do financial advisors charge?

    Financial advisors who operate as fee-only planners charge a percentage, usually 1 to 2%, of a client's net assets. For a ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Can your car insurance company check your driving record?

    While your auto insurance company cannot pull your full motor vehicle report, or MVR, it does pull a record summary that ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Hot Definitions
  1. Zero-Sum Game

    A situation in which one person’s gain is equivalent to another’s loss, so that the net change in wealth or benefit is zero. ...
  2. Capitalization Rate

    The rate of return on a real estate investment property based on the income that the property is expected to generate.
  3. Gross Profit

    A company's total revenue (equivalent to total sales) minus the cost of goods sold. Gross profit is the profit a company ...
  4. Revenue

    The amount of money that a company actually receives during a specific period, including discounts and deductions for returned ...
  5. Normal Profit

    An economic condition occurring when the difference between a firm’s total revenue and total cost is equal to zero.
  6. Operating Cost

    Expenses associated with the maintenance and administration of a business on a day-to-day basis.
Trading Center
You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!