Because institutions such as mutual funds, pension funds, hedge funds and private equity firms have large sums of money at their disposal, their involvement in most stocks is usually welcomed with open arms as their vocal interests are often aligned with shareholders. However, institutional involvement isn't always a positive thing, especially when the institutions are selling.

As part of the research process, individual investors should peruse 13D filings (available at the Security and Exchange Commission's website) and other sources to see the size of institutional holdings in a firm along with recent purchases and sales. Read on for some of pros and cons that go along with institutional ownership that retail investors should be aware of.

Pros of Institutional Ownership
Smart Money Involvement
Portfolio managers often have teams of analysts at their disposal, as well as access to a host of corporate and market data that most retail investors could only dream of. As such, they are able to perform in-depth analyses.

Does this guarantee they'll make money in the stock? No. But it does greatly enhance the probability they will book a profit, and may put them in a better position than individual investors. (To learn more, read Institutional Investors And Fundamentals: What's The Link?)

Institutions Market the Stock
After some institutions (such as mutual funds and hedge funds) establish a position in a stock, their next move is to tout the company's merits to the sell side. Why? The answer is to drive interest in the stock and boost the value of the share price.

In fact, that's why you see professionals such as top-notch portfolio and hedge fund managers touting stocks on television, radio or at investment conferences. Sure, finance professionals like to educate people, but they also like to make money, and they can do that by marketing their positions much like a retailer would advertise its merchandise.

Once a institutional investor firm establishes a large position, its next motive is typically to find ways to drive up its value. In short, investors who get in at or near the beginning of the institutional investor buying process stand to make a lot of money. (For more insight, see What is the difference between a buy-side analyst and a sell-side analyst?)

Institutions Can Be Good Citizen Shareholders
Institutional turnover in most stocks is quite low. That's because it takes a great deal of time and money to research a company and to build a position in it.

In any case, when funds do obtain large positions, they want to do their utmost to make sure their investments don't go awry. To that end, they'll often maintain a dialogue with the company's board of directors, and look to acquire stocks that other firms might want to sell before they hit the open market.

While hedge funds have received the lion's share of attention when it comes being considered "activist", a number of mutual funds have ramped up their pressure on boards of directors as well. For example, Olstein Financial generated a lot of press, particularly in late 2005 and early 2006, for peppering several companies, including Jo-Ann Stores, with a host of suggestions for driving shareholder value like suggesting to hire a new CEO. (For more insight, see Activist Hedge Funds.)

The lesson that individual investors need to learn here is that there are instances when institutions and management teams can and do work together to enhance common shareholder value.

Cons of Institutional Ownership
Fickleness Can Kill
Investors should understand that although mutual funds are supposed to focus their efforts on building their clients' assets over the long haul, individual portfolio managers are frequently evaluated on their performance on a quarterly basis. This is because of the growing trend to benchmark funds (and their returns) against those of major market indexes such as the S&P 500. (For more insight, see Is Your Portfolio Beating Its Benchmark?)

This process of evaluation is quite unfortunate because often what happens is that if a portfolio manager is having a bad quarter, he or she will dump underperforming positions (and buy into companies that have trading momentum) in the hope of achieving parity with the major indexes in the following quarter. This can lead to increased trading costs, taxable situations and the likelihood that the fund is selling at least some of these stocks at an inopportune time. (For more on this, see Why Fund Managers Risk Too Much.)

Hedge funds are also notorious for placing quarterly demands on their managers and traders. This however, is due less to benchmarking and more to the fact that many hedge fund managers get to keep 20% of the profits they generate. In any case, the pressure on these managers and the resulting fickleness can lead to extreme volatility in certain stocks; it can also hurt the individual investor who happens to be on the wrong side of a given trade.

Selling Leads to Excess Supply
Because institutional investors can own hundreds of thousands, or even millions, of shares, when an institutional investor decides to sell, the stock will often sell off, which impacts many individual shareholders.

Case in point: When well-known activist shareholder Carl Ichan sold off a position in Mylan Labs in 2004, its shares shed nearly 5% on the day of the sale as the market had to absorb the shares.

Of course, it is impossible to assign the total value of a stock's declines to institutional sales. The timing of sales and concurrent declines in those share prices should leave investors with the understanding that large institutional selling does not help a stock go up. Also, the sales are often a harbinger of things to come, due to the access and expertise of these institutions - remember they all have analysts working for them.

The big lesson here is that institutional selling can send a stock into a downdraft regardless of the underlying fundamentals of the company.

Proxy Fights Can Hurt Individual Investors
As mentioned above, institutional activists will typically purchase large quantities of shares and then use their equity ownership as leverage to obtain a board seat and enforce their agendas. However, while such a coup can be a boon for the common shareholder, the unfortunate fact is that many proxy fights are typically long, drawn out processes that can have an adverse impact on the underlying stock, as well as the individual shareholder.

Take for example what happened at The Topps Company in 2005. Two hedge funds, Pembridge Capital Management and Crescendo Partners, each with a position in the stock, tried to force a vote on a new slate of directors. Although the battle was eventually settled, the common stock lost about 12% of its value during the three months of wrangling between the parties. Again, while the full blame of the fall in share price can't be placed on this one incident, these events don't help share prices move up because they create bad press and often force executives to focus on the battle instead of the company.

Investors should be aware that although a fund may get involved in a stock with the intention of doing something good, the road can be difficult and the share price could, and often does, wane until the outcome becomes more certain.

The Bottom Line
Individual investors should not only be aware of which firms have an ownership position in a given stock, but also of the potential for other firms to acquire shares and reasons that a current owner might liquidate its position. Institutional owners have the power to both create and destroy value for individual investors. As a result, it is important that investors keep tabs on and react to the moves the stock's biggest players are making.

Related Articles
  1. Professionals

    Are Hedge Fund ETFs Suitable for Your Portfolio?

    Are hedge fund ETFs right for you? Here's what investors need to consider.
  2. Investing Basics

    How AQR Places Bets Against Beta

    Learn how the bet against beta strategy is used by a large hedge fund to profit from a pricing anomaly in the stock market caused by high stock prices.
  3. Professionals

    Index or Target Dates in 401(k)s: Which is Better?

    A common question is whether or not plan participants should choose index or target date funds in a 401(k). The answer depends on different scenarios.
  4. Investing

    6 Reasons Why Every Investor Should Consider ETFs

    Once you understand the benefits of ETFs, you’ll see how they could be an exciting and smart way to help meet your financial goals. Here some key facts.
  5. Term

    What's an Investment Advisor?

    An investment or financial advisor makes investment recommendations and analyzes securities.
  6. Investing News

    Understanding How Mutual Funds Pay Dividends

    The process by which mutual fund dividends are calculated, distributed and reported is fairly straightforward in most cases. Here's a look.
  7. Investing Basics

    Explaining the High-Water Mark

    A high-water mark ensures fund managers are not paid performance fees when they perform poorly.
  8. Investing Basics

    Explaining Front-End Load

    A front-end load is a commission or sales charge paid by the investor at the initial purchase of an investment.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    What's The Difference Between Bond & Equity ETFs?

    Learn how different stock ETFs and bond ETFs are, though they actually have quite a few things in common.
  10. Professionals

    State Street Shifts to Hedge Funds

    ETF pioneer State Street has been losing market share to its peers. Here's how it plans to turn that around.
RELATED TERMS
  1. Equity

    The value of an asset less the value of all liabilities on that ...
  2. Series 6

    A securities license entitling the holder to register as a limited ...
  3. Exchange-Traded Mutual Funds (ETMF)

    Investopedia explains the definition of exchange-traded mutual ...
  4. Tactical Trading

    A style of investing for the relatively short term based on anticipated ...
  5. Maximum Drawdown (MDD)

    The maximum loss from a peak to a trough of a portfolio, before ...
  6. Gross Exposure

    The absolute level of a fund's investments.
RELATED FAQS
  1. Is there a situation in which wash trading is legal?

    Wash trading, the intentional practice of manipulating a stock's activity level to deceive other investors, is not a legal ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What action is the SEC likely to take on 12b-1 fees?

    The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may take action to impose greater regulation on how 12b-1 fees are used, or ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What is considered a reasonable 12b-1 fee?

    A reasonable 12b-1 fee is generally considered to be 0.25% of the assets of the mutual fund. The maximum amount allowed for ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. What are some of the most common mutual funds that give exposure to the retail sector?

    There are a number of mutual funds that give exposure to the retail sector. Three of the most popular funds are the Fidelity ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What is the 12b-1 fee meant to cover?

    A 12b-1 fee in a mutual fund is meant to cover the fees of companies and individuals through which investors of a fund buy ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What are the most popular mutual funds that give exposure to the utilities sector?

    Some of the most popular mutual funds that provide exposure to the utilities sector include American Century Utilities, Prudential ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
×

You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!