The lending of securities has quietly become a big business. The global volume of securities loans was $2.3 trillion in the fall of 2008, according to estimates from U.K-based consulting firm Data Explorers. Proponents say securities lending makes financial markets more efficient and improves returns for investors. Critics say it raises questions about the fiduciary duties of money managers and poses risks to investor's portfolios as well as the financial system.

What is Securities Lending?
Securities lending occurs when investors lend stocks, bonds and other securities in their portfolios to other market participants. By far, the biggest lenders are institutional investors such as mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and pension funds. They are harvesting billions of dollars in profits.

The market participants who borrow the securities are typically hedge funds. They use the borrowed securities to make short sales (ie. the securities are sold on the expectation they can be bought back at lower prices to turn a profit). Borrowers are required to put up collateral at least equal in value to the securities. (Learn more about short sales in Questioning The Virtue Of A Short Sale.)

Other aspects include:

  • Collateral is marked to market on a daily basis to ensure adequate coverage of loans.
  • Cash collateral is invested and earns interest that is split in varying degrees between lenders and borrowers.
  • Dividends and coupons from loaned securities are, in most cases, passed on to the lenders (beneficial owners).
  • Securities lending may be a self-administered program of the institutional investor or facilitated by intermediaries such as custodian banks and prime brokers.

There are several pros and cons to securities lending. Two benefits are market efficiency and lower management expense ratios (MERs). Concerns include: potentially lower investment returns, sharing of lending fees, heightened risk and opacity.

Benefits

  1. More efficient markets - By supporting short selling, security lending increases liquidity in the market by increasing the number of sellers, which results in benefits such as lower bid-ask spreads. It also allows financial markets to more fully reflect all available information, thus promoting the efficient pricing of securities.
  2. Potentially lower MERs - The fees earned from loaning out securities can be used to defray the costs of institutional investors and thus allow them to lower their management fees to investors. If lending fees become large enough, they could potentially fully offset management costs and enable, if they so wish, reductions in MERs to 0%.

Concerns

  1. Potentially lower investment returns - Security lending seems at odds with the fiduciary duties of institutional investors. There is an expectation their focus should be on optimizing the value of their clients' holdings, yet the practice has side effects that appear to go against this duty. Specifically, institutional investors are:
    • Collateral is marked to market on a daily basis to ensure adequate coverage of loans.
    • Cash collateral is invested and earns interest that is split in varying degrees between lenders and borrowers.
    • Dividends and coupons from loaned securities are, in most cases, passed on to the lenders (beneficial owners).
    • Securities lending may be a self-administered program of the institutional investor or facilitated by intermediaries such as custodian banks and prime brokers.
  2. Inequitable division of loan revenues - Not all institutional investors pass on the full amount of lending revenues (after costs) to their clients. Many keep large portions, or even all, of the fees for themselves. Yet the securities belong to their clients and it is not obvious they would consent to such a generous division of the spoils if allowed a say in the matter.

    Some observers have asserted that funds taking a large revenue share have greater incentives to maximize those revenues. And even after taking their cut they can pass on more revenues to unitholders than companies who just seek to cover costs. Two counterarguments are:

    • Making it easier for short sellers to bet against the securities owned by their clients, which may create downward pressures on their prices and contribute to the severity of market declines.
    • Limiting their capacity to actively campaign for shareholder value since voting interests in shares are relinquished when stocks are lent out.
  3. Heightened risk - Borrowers may not be able to meet margin calls on their collateral or return borrowed securities upon request. The borrower's collateral can be seized and/or sold but this may at times yield less than the value of the loaned-out securities – especially when collateral of lesser quality has been accepted and market conditions make it difficult to sell at good prices.

    Cash collateral can be invested in places where the risk of losing return and principal is high, as the financial crisis of 2008 brought to light. For example, some funds had collateral invested in mortgage-backed securities when demand for such instruments evaporated. Others lost collateral when Lehman Bros went bankrupt. (For an overview of the financial crisis beginning at the start of 2008, refer to The 2007-08 Financial Crisis In Review.)

  4. Lack of transparency - Securities lending occurs "over the counter," between financial institutions, not through a centralized exchange. Also, disclosure by institutional investors to their clients is not the greatest. Within such an opaque environment, the potential for questionable arrangements and excessive risk taking is high. Some examples:
  • Making it easier for short sellers to bet against the securities owned by their clients, which may create downward pressures on their prices and contribute to the severity of market declines.
  • Limiting their capacity to actively campaign for shareholder value since voting interests in shares are relinquished when stocks are lent out.

Conclusion
Personal-finance columnist Jason Zweig ended his May 30, 2009 Wall Street Journal article on securities lending with this:

Your fund should lend out your securities, but the proceeds should go to you. And fund managers should reinvest the collateral only in absolutely safe securities. The current system, where they keep half [or other large portion of] the gains and stick you with all the risks, has got to go.

It might be added that the mismatching of gains and risks in securities lending (plus the lack of transparency) bears watching. As security lending grows and takes on more significance, it could pose a systemic risk to the financial system - in a way similar to mortgage-backed securities ahead of the crisis of 2008.

As may be recalled, U.S. banks had incentives to loosen lending standards and ramp up mortgages because origination fees accrued to them while the risk of defaults accrued to the holders of the securitized mortgages. Could there be an analogous misalignment in rewards and risk across economic agents in the case of security lending?

For additional reading, take a look at Why Fund Managers Risk Too Much and Will A New Fund Manager Cost You?

Related Articles
  1. Investing News

    Should You Be Betting with Buffett Right Now?

    Following Warren Buffett's stock picks has historically been a good strategy. Is considering his biggest holdings in 2016 a good idea?
  2. Investing News

    Today's Sell-off: Are We in a Margin Liquidation?

    If we're in market liquidation, is it good news or bad news? That party depends on your timeframe.
  3. Fundamental Analysis

    HF Performance Report: Did Hedge Funds Earn Their Fee in 2015?

    Find out whether hedge funds, which have come under tremendous pressure to improve their performance, managed to earn their fee in 2015.
  4. Investing Basics

    Bill Ackman's 2 Best Investments (GGP, CP)

    Learn about the two best investments Ackman ever made. Ackman has demonstrated a consistent track record of success in all types of market environments.
  5. Investing

    George Soros: 3 Best Investments Ever

    Learn about some of the most successful trades famed investor George Soros has made during his career, including a billion dollar profit against the pound.
  6. Chart Advisor

    How Are You Trading The Breakdown In Growth Stocks? (VOOG, IWF)

    Based on the charts of these two ETFs, bearish traders will start turning their attention to growth stocks.
  7. Saving and Spending

    Where Does Bill Ackman Keep His Money?

    Learn about where prominent hedge fund manager Bill Ackman keeps his money. See how his short position in Herbalife has not been successful so far.
  8. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Pimco’s Top Funds for Retirement Income

    Once you're living off the money you've saved for retirement, is it invested in the right assets? Here are some from PIMCO that may be good options.
  9. Stock Analysis

    Elliott Management: An Activist Investor Analysis (HES, CTXS)

    Learn about the activist investor strategies used by Elliott Management. Read about the fund's positions in Hess Corp., Citrix and CDK Global.
  10. Chart Advisor

    Watch This ETF For Signs Of A Reversal (BCX)

    Trying to determine if the commodity markets are ready for a bounce? Take a look at the analysis of this ETF to find out if now is the time to buy.
RELATED FAQS
  1. What is a derivative?

    A derivative is a contract between two or more parties whose value is based on an agreed-upon underlying financial asset, ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is securitization?

    Securitization is the process of taking an illiquid asset, or group of assets, and through financial engineering, transforming ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Can hedge funds trade penny stocks?

    Hedge funds can trade penny stocks. In fact, hedge funds can trade in just about any type of security, including medium- ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Are hedge funds regulated by FINRA?

    Alternative investment vehicles such as hedge funds offer investors a wider range of possibilities due to certain exceptions ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Which mutual funds made money in 2008?

    Out of the 2,800 mutual funds that Morningstar, Inc., the leading provider of independent investment research in North America, ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Should mutual funds be subject to more regulation?

    Mutual funds, when compared to other types of pooled investments such as hedge funds, have very strict regulations. In fact, ... Read Full Answer >>
Hot Definitions
  1. Liquidation Margin

    Liquidation margin refers to the value of all of the equity positions in a margin account. If an investor or trader holds ...
  2. Black Swan

    An event or occurrence that deviates beyond what is normally expected of a situation and that would be extremely difficult ...
  3. Inverted Yield Curve

    An interest rate environment in which long-term debt instruments have a lower yield than short-term debt instruments of the ...
  4. Socially Responsible Investment - SRI

    An investment that is considered socially responsible because of the nature of the business the company conducts. Common ...
  5. Presidential Election Cycle (Theory)

    A theory developed by Yale Hirsch that states that U.S. stock markets are weakest in the year following the election of a ...
Trading Center