In capital budgeting, there are a number of different approaches that can be used to evaluate any given project, and each approach has its own distinct advantages and disadvantages.
All other things being equal, using internal rate of return (IRR) and net present value (NPV) measurements to evaluate projects often results in the same findings. However, there are a number of projects for which using IRR is not as effective as using NPV to discount cash flows. IRR's major limitation is also its greatest strength: it uses one single discount rate to evaluate every investment.
Although using one discount rate simplifies matters, there are a number of situations that cause problems for IRR. If an analyst is evaluating two projects, both of which share a common discount rate, predictable cash flows, equal risk, and a shorter time horizon, IRR will probably work. The catch is that discount rates usually change substantially over time. For example, think about using the rate of return on a Tbill in the last 20 years as a discount rate. Oneyear Tbills returned between 1% and 12% in the last 20 years, so clearly the discount rate is changing.
Without modification, IRR does not account for changing discount rates, so it's just not adequate for longerterm projects with discount rates that are expected to vary. (To learn more, read Taking Stock Of Discounted Cash Flow, Anything But Ordinary: Calculating The Present And Future Value Of Annuities and Investors Need A Good WACC.)
Another type of project for which a basic IRR calculation is ineffective is a project with a mixture of multiple positive and negative cash flows. For example, consider a project for which marketers must reinvent the style every couple of years to stay current in a fickle, trendy niche market. If the project has cash flows of $50,000 in year one (initial capital outlay), returns of $115,000 in year two and costs of $66,000 in year three because the marketing department needed to revise the look of the project, a single IRR can't be used. Recall that IRR is the discount rate that makes a project break even. If market conditions change over the years, this project can have two or more IRRs, as seen below.
Thus, there are at least two solutions for IRR that make the equation equal to zero, so there are multiple rates of return for the project that produce multiple IRRs. The advantage to using the NPV method here is that NPV can handle multiple discount rates without any problems. Each cash flow can be discounted separately from the others.
Another situation that causes problems for users of the IRR method is when the discount rate of a project is not known. In order for the IRR to be considered a valid way to evaluate a project, it must be compared to a discount rate. If the IRR is above the discount rate, the project is feasible; if it is below, the project is considered infeasible. If a discount rate is not known, or cannot be applied to a specific project for whatever reason, the IRR is of limited value. In cases like this, the NPV method is superior. If a project's NPV is above zero, then it is considered to be financially worthwhile.
So, why is the IRR method still commonly used in capital budgeting? Its popularity is probably a direct result of its reporting simplicity. The NPV method is inherently complex and requires assumptions at each stage  discount rate, likelihood of receiving the cash payment, etc. The IRR method simplifies projects to a single number that management can use to determine whether or not a project is economically viable. The result is simple, but for any project that is longterm, that has multiple cash flows at different discount rates, or that has uncertain cash flows  in fact, for almost any project at all  simple IRR isn't good for much more than presentation value.
For more information on capital budgeting, see Spotting Profitability With ROCE.

What is the formula for calculating internal rate of return (IRR) in Excel?
Understand how to calculate the internal rate of return (IRR) using Excel and how this metric is used to determine anticipated ... Read Answer >> 
How do you use internal rate of return to calculate a capital budget?
Learn about how the internal rate of return is used in the creation of a capital budget along with net present value and ... Read Answer >> 
What's the difference between weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and internal ...
Both weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and internal rate of return (IRR) are great measures for assessing value, but ... Read Answer >> 
What is the relationship between the hurdle rate (MARR) and the Internal Rate of ...
Find out how companies and managers use hurdle rate, or MARR, and internal rate of return, or IRR, to evaluate projects and ... Read Answer >> 
What is the formula for calculating the internal rate of return (IRR)?
Learn about the internal rate of return, an important concept in determining the relative attractiveness of different investments. Read Answer >> 
How do you use discounted cash flow to calculate a capital budget?
Learn how discounted cash flows are used in creating capital budgets as a part of the net present value and internal rate ... Read Answer >>

Professionals
Capital Budgeting
Capital budgeting is really important when making important business decisions. 
Economics
Capital Budgeting: Which is Better, IRR or NPV?
Using internal rate of return and net present value for capital budgeting evaluations often end in the same result. But there are times when using NPV to discount cash flows makes more sense. 
Professionals
Internal Rate Of Return
Find out how to use IRR to analyze capital budgeting projects. 
Fundamental Analysis
Internal Rate Of Return: An Inside Look
Use this method to choose which project or investment is right for you. 
Investing Basics
Capital Budgeting: Capital Budgeting Decision Tools
Once projects have been identified, management then begins the financial process of determining whether or not the project should be pursued. The three common capital budgeting decision tools ... 
Professionals
Advantages And Disadvantages Of NPV and IRR
Find out how to decide when to use these two methods, and when to avoid them. 
Fundamental Analysis
Return on Investment (ROI) Vs. Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Read about the similarities and differences between an investment's internal rate of return (IRR) and its return on investment (ROI). 
Fundamental Analysis
Calculating the Internal Rate of Return Using Excel
The internal rate of return on investments is explained and illustrated in different investment scenarios. 
Professionals
Advantages and Disadvantages of the NPV and IRR Methods
CFA Level 1  Advantages and Disadvantages of the NPV and IRR Methods. Learn the advantages and disadvantages to the NPV and IRR valuation methods. Explains why these two methods can offer conflicting ... 
Term
Internal Rate of Return Formula for Excel
The internal rate of return, or IRR, is a popular metric businesses use to measure a projectâ€™s return on investment.

Internal Rate Of Return  IRR
A metric used in capital budgeting measuring the profitability ... 
IRR Rule
A measure for evaluating whether to proceed with a project or ... 
The Net Internal Rate Of Return  Net IRR
A measure of a portfolio or fund's performance that is equal ... 
Pooled Internal Rate Of Return  PIRR
A method of calculating the overall internal rate of return (IRR) ... 
Modified Internal Rate Of Return  MIRR
While the internal rate of return (IRR) assumes the cash flows ... 
Net Present Value  NPV
Net Present Value (NPV) is the difference between the present ...