A:

A staggered board of directors (also known as a classified board) is a board that is made up of different classes of directors. Usually, there are three classes, with each class serving for a different term length than the other. Elections for the directors of staggered boards usually happen on an annual basis. At each election, shareholders are asked to vote to fill whatever positions of the board are vacant, or up for re-election. Terms of service for elected directors vary, but one-, three- and five-year terms are common.

Information on corporate governance policies and board composition can be found in a public company's proxy statement. Generally, proponents of staggered boards sight two main advantages that staggered boards have over traditionally elected boards: board continuity and anti-takeover provisions - hostile acquirers have a difficult time gaining control of companies with staggered boards. Opponents of staggered boards, however, argue that they are less accountable to shareholders than annually elected boards and that staggering board terms tends to breed a fraternal atmosphere inside the boardroom that serves to protect the interests of management above those of shareholders. (To learn more, read Governance Pays, The Basics Of Corporate Structure and What Are Corporate Actions?)

According to a study conducted by three Harvard University professors and published in the Stanford Law Review, more than 70% of all companies that went public in 2001 had staggered boards. Despite their popularity, however, the study suggests that staggered boards tend to reduce shareholder returns more significantly than non-staggered boards in the event of a hostile takeover. When a hostile bidder tries to acquire a company with a staggered board, it is forced to wait at least one year for the next annual meeting of shareholders before it can gain control. Furthermore, hostile bidders are forced to win two seats on the board; the elections for these seats occur at different points in time (at least one year apart), creating yet another obstacle for the hostile bidder. Hostile bidders that manage to win one seat allow staggered boards the opportunity to defend the company they represent against the takeover by implementing a poison pill tactic to further deter the takeover, effectively guaranteeing continuity of management. Furthermore, in a hostile takeover, hostile bidders tend to offer shareholders a premium for their shares, so in many cases, hostile takeovers are good for shareholders. They get to sell their shares for more money after a hostile bid than they would have before it occurred. According to the Harvard study, in the nine months after a hostile takeover bid was announced, shares in companies with staggered boards increased only 31.8%, compared to the average of 43.4% returned to stockholders of companies with non-staggered boards (Bebchuk, Coates and Subramanian; 2002). Although hostile takeovers are a fairly rare occurrence, the fact remains that boards are elected to represent shareholder interests; because staggered boards may deter takeovers (and the premiums paid for shares as a result of takeovers), this puts the two at odds. Even so, a staggered board does offer continuity of leadership, which surely has some value provided that the company is being led in the right direction in the first place.

For more information on mergers, acquisitions and takeovers, read The Wacky World Of M&As and War's Influence On Wall Street.

RELATED FAQS
  1. How can a company resist a hostile takeover?

    Learn about some of the defense strategies a public company's board of directors might employ to prevent a hostile bidder ... Read Answer >>
  2. Under what circumstances might a company decide to do a hostile takeover?

    Learn about why companies use a hostile takeover to gain control of another company, and understand the different methods ... Read Answer >>
  3. If a company offers a buyback of its shares, how do I decide whether to accept the ...

    Learn why it may often be in the best interest of a shareholder to accept a tender offer made at a premium to the market ... Read Answer >>
  4. What is the difference between a hostile takeover and a friendly takeover?

    Learn about the difference between a hostile takeover and a friendly takeover, and understand how proxy fights and tender ... Read Answer >>
  5. How effective is a poison pill defense against a hostile takeover?

    Learn about the different types of poison pill strategies that target companies use to prevent hostile takeovers, and understand ... Read Answer >>
  6. What's the difference between a merger and a hostile takeover?

    Understand the difference between a merger and a hostile takeover, including the different ways one company can acquire another, ... Read Answer >>
Related Articles
  1. Investing

    Hostile Takeover

    A hostile takeovers is an unfriendly acquisition attempt by a company or raider that is strongly resisted by the management and the board of directors of the target firm. Learn more about the ...
  2. Investing

    What Does the Board of Directors Do?

    Every public company must have a board of directors. These boards establish administrative policies including the hiring and firing of executives, the distribution of dividends, and executive ...
  3. Small Business

    What is a Takeover?

    A takeover happens when one company makes a bid to acquire a target company.
  4. Managing Wealth

    How To Become A Corporate Board Member

    We look at how corporate boards are constructed, and how investors can get involved.
  5. Investing

    Warding Off Hostile Takeovers

    The purpose of this article is to provide a general overview of hostile corporate takeovers, while highlighting a general course of action against such activity. This article provides basic information ...
  6. Managing Wealth

    Retired Execs: How Much Do Corporate Boards Pay?

    If you have the right skill set, getting a seat on a company board can be a lucrative and stimulating way to spend some of your new free time.
  7. Investing

    The Basics Of Corporate Structure

    CEOs, CFOs, presidents and vice presidents: learn how to tell the difference.
  8. Investing

    Mergers And Acquisitions: Understanding Takeovers

    In the dramatic world of M&As, battleground terms meld with bizarre metaphors to form the language of the game.
  9. Investing

    Poison Pill

    A poison pill is a corporate maneuver put in place to try and prevent a hostile takeover. The target corporation uses this strategy to make its stock less attractive to the acquirer. This is ...
  10. Managing Wealth

    3 Reasons To Separate CEO And Chairman Positions

    Separating these high-profile positions can help to strengthen the overall integrity of a company.
RELATED TERMS
  1. Staggered Board

    A staggered board consists of a board of directors whose members ...
  2. Classified Board

    A structure for a board of directors in which a portion of the ...
  3. Stagger System

    A method of electing a company's board of directors that puts ...
  4. Board Of Directors - B Of D

    A group of individuals that are elected as, or elected to act ...
  5. Hostile Bid

    A specific type of takeover bid that is presented directly to ...
  6. Hostile Takeover

    The acquisition of one company (called the target company) by ...
Hot Definitions
  1. Co-pay

    A type of insurance policy where the insured pays a specified amount of out-of-pocket expenses for health-care services such ...
  2. Protectionism

    Government actions and policies that restrict or restrain international trade, often done with the intent of protecting local ...
  3. Fiduciary

    A fiduciary is a person who acts on behalf of another person, or persons to manage assets.
  4. Demonetization

    Demonetization is the act of stripping a currency unit of its status as legal tender and is necessary whenever there is a ...
  5. Investment

    An asset or item that is purchased with the hope that it will generate income or appreciate in the future. In an economic ...
  6. Redlining

    The unethical practice whereby financial institutions make it extremely difficult or impossible for residents of poor inner-city ...
Trading Center