Is tracking error a significant measure for determining ex-post risk?

By Casey Murphy AAA
A:

Before we answer your question, let's first define tracking error and ex-post risk. Tracking error refers to the amount by which the returns of a stock portfolio or a fund differ from those of a certain benchmark. As you might expect, a fund that has a high tracking error is not expected to follow the benchmark closely, and it is generally seen as being risky.

The other component of the question is ex-post risk, which is a measure of the variance of an asset's returns relative to a mean value. In other words, ex-post risk is the statistical variance of an asset's historical returns. Many individuals would argue that tracking error is not the best measure to determine ex-post risk because it looks at the returns of a portfolio relative to a benchmark rather than looking at the variability in the portfolio's returns. Tracking error can be a useful tool when determining how closely a portfolio mimics a stable benchmark, or how efficient a portfolio's manager is at tracking a benchmark, but many would argue that this is not a good measure of how much an investor can expect to gain or lose on any given trading day. However, ex-post risk, unlike tracking error, can provide an estimate of the probability that the expected return of a portfolio will drop by a certain amount on any given day, which is why it is a common risk metric used by professionals when studying things such as value at risk.

Using tracking error as a measure of ex-post risk would only make sense when tracking error is equal to zero because when an investor's portfolio consists of many stable companies that have produced predictable, stable returns, the historical variance of the benchmark's returns would be equal to those of the portfolio.

To learn more see, Introduction To Value At Risk (VAR) - Part 1 and Part 2 and Determining Risk And The Risk Pyramid.

RELATED FAQS

  1. How can a representative sample lead to sampling bias?

    Learn how using representative samples alone is not enough to make sampling bias negligible and why elements such as randomization ...
  2. What's the difference between a representative sample and a convenience sample?

    Learn the difference between convenience sampling and representative sampling and the advantages and disadvantages of each ...
  3. What percentage of the population do you need in a representative sample?

    Learn about representative samples and how they are used in conjunction with other strategies to create useful data with ...
  4. What's the difference between a representative sample and a random sample?

    Explore the differences between representative samples and random samples, and discover how they are often used in tandem ...
RELATED TERMS
  1. Altman Z-Score

    The output of a credit-strength test that gauges a publicly traded ...
  2. Fintech

    Fintech is a portmanteau of financial technology that describes ...
  3. Indicator

    Indicators are statistics used to measure current conditions ...
  4. Intraday Momentum Index (IMI)

    A technical indicator that combines aspects of candlestick analysis ...
  5. Forex Spread Betting

    A category of spread betting that involves taking a bet on the ...
  6. Compound Annual Growth Rate - CAGR

    The year-over-year growth rate of an investment over a specified ...

You May Also Like

Related Articles
  1. Chart Advisor

    Defensive? Eye Infrastructure via the ...

  2. Trading Strategies

    Market Timing Tips & Rules You Should ...

  3. Chart Advisor

    Commodity Traders Are Using This ETF ...

  4. Trading Strategies

    Trading Risks And Rewards In Your Favor

  5. Investing Basics

    How To Outperform Warren Buffett Using ...

Trading Center