What is the broken window fallacy?

By Andrew Beattie AAA
A:

The broken window fallacy was first expressed by the great French economist, Frederic Bastiat. Bastiat used the parable of a broken window to point out why destruction doesn't benefit the economy.

In Bastiat's tale, a man's son breaks a pane of glass, meaning the man will have to pay to replace it. The onlookers consider the situation and decide that the boy has actually done the community a service because his father will have to pay the glazier (window repair man) to replace the broken pane. The glazier will then presumably spend the extra money on something else, jump-starting the local economy. (For related reading, see Economics Basics.)

The onlookers come to believe that breaking windows stimulates the economy, but Bastiat points out that further analysis exposes the fallacy. By breaking the window, the man's son has reduced his father's disposable income, meaning his father will not be able purchase new shoes or some other luxury good. Thus, the broken window might help the glazier, but at the same time, it robs other industries and reduces the amount being spent on other goods. Moreover, replacing something that has already been purchased is a maintenance cost, rather than a purchase of truly new goods, and maintenance doesn't stimulate production. In short, Bastiat suggests that destruction - and its costs - don't pay in an economic sense.

The broken window fallacy is often used to discredit the idea that going to war stimulates a country's economy. As with the broken window, war causes resources and capital to be funneled out of industries that produce goods to industries that destroy things, leading to even more costs. According to this line of reasoning, the rebuilding that occurs after war is primarily maintenance costs, meaning that countries would be much better off not fighting at all.

The broken window fallacy also demonstrates the faulty conclusions of the onlookers; by only taking into consideration the man with the broken window and the glazier who must replace it, the crowd forgets about the missing third party (such as the shoe maker). In this sense, the fallacy comes from making a decision by looking only at the parties directly involved in the short term, rather than looking at all parties (directly and indirectly) involved in the short and long term.

For related reading, see Macroeconomic Analysis.

RELATED FAQS

  1. Are oil prices and interest rates correlated?

    Yes. No. Maybe. Definitely. There's no easy answer to this question. While many theories abound, the reality is that oil ...
  2. Who determines interest rates?

    In countries using a centralized banking model, interest rates are determined by the central bank. In the first step of interest ...
  3. What is the Mont Pelerin Society?

    The Mont Pelerin Society was formed in 1947 when economist Friedrich von Hayek invited 39 people to meet at Mont Pelerin ...
  4. What is QE3 (quantitative easing)?

    "Quantitative easing" refers to steps that the U.S. Federal Reserve takes in attempting to boost the country's lagging economy. ...
RELATED TERMS
  1. LIBOR

    LIBOR or ICE LIBOR (previously BBA LIBOR) is a benchmark rate ...
  2. Global Recession

    An extended period of economic decline around the world. The ...
  3. Economic Exposure

    A type of foreign exchange exposure caused by the effect of unexpected ...
  4. Heckscher-Ohlin Model

    An economic theory that states that countries export what they ...
  5. North American Free Trade Agreement - NAFTA

    A regulation implemented on Jan. 1, 1994, that decreased and ...
  6. Current Account Surplus

    A positive difference between a nation’s savings and investment. ...
comments powered by Disqus
Related Articles
  1. How Influential Economists Changed Our ...
    Fundamental Analysis

    How Influential Economists Changed Our ...

  2. The Dark Side Of The WTO
    Economics

    The Dark Side Of The WTO

  3. Investment Misselling A Global Problem
    Personal Finance

    Investment Misselling A Global Problem

  4. Coping With Inflation Risk
    Bonds & Fixed Income

    Coping With Inflation Risk

  5. The Economics Of Labor Mobility
    Economics

    The Economics Of Labor Mobility

Trading Center