A:

The craze of the dotcom bubble and the flood of capital that came with it led to many back-of-the-napkin business models becoming publicly traded companies almost overnight. Companies like Amazon (Nasdaq:AMZN) and eBay (Nasdaq:EBAY) adapted on the fly and survived the bust, but many others went under within months of their IPOs. One of the quickest journeys from IPO to insolvency was Pets.com.

Pets.com was based on an Amazon-style internet purchasing system where users ordered pet supplies from the website and the company arranged delivery. The company brought in $82.5 million during its IPO. Its shares opened at $11 and then went up as high as $14. However, less than three months after the IPO, the company's share price dropped to $5, in large part because the company had failed to post a profit and was, in fact, operating at a loss.

The problem with the company's business plan was that pet supplies of all types - food, toys, clothing and so on - could be found easily at the nearest grocery or department store. Given the choice between ordering online and waiting for delivery or walking into the nearest store to buy the product and take it home immediately, the majority of people preferred the latter. Nine months of straight losses convinced the company to fold and sell its assets before more losses were incurred. To Pets.com's credit, it used the funds raised by the fire sale to pay back investors what they could. Although Pets.com tried to do the right thing in the end, questions remained about how they ended up conducting an IPO with a business plan that made Swiss cheese look solid.

Behind the fall of Pets.com, the darker story of underwriting banks and their analysts loomed during the internet boom. Even as Pets.com posted losses and the stock price dropped, the issuing firm's analyst, Merrill Lynch's Henry Blodget, did not change his buy rating until the summer. It fit Merrill Lynch's plans to keep Pets.com in action for as long as possible because the bank was collecting millions in investment banking fees, regardless of the company's condition. This was yet another example of a supposedly impartial analyst being directed to protect a bank's interests, rather than those of investors who depended on honest ratings.

(For more on this topic, read Crashes: The Dotcom Crash.)

This question was answered by Andrew Beattie.

RELATED FAQS
  1. What lessons did the tech bubble crash give to investors in the Internet sector?

    Learn how investors contributed to the dot-com bust and how Internet services and investing has changed since the market ... Read Answer >>
  2. How has investing in the Internet sector evolved over time?

    Learn how early investors of the Internet sector received a valuable lesson and influenced modern-day markets after the dot-come ... Read Answer >>
  3. What are the main reasons for investing in the internet sector?

    Explore key reasons for investing in companies in the Internet sector. Learn about leading companies delivering products ... Read Answer >>
Related Articles
  1. Investing

    Investing In Fads

    From high-flying to fading fast, fads can mean big money for nimble investors.
  2. Insights

    'Irrational Exuberance' 20 Years On

    The S&P is up 196% since Greenspan uttered these now-famous words.
  3. Financial Advisor

    Is the Stock Market Crashing? 5 Signs to Consider

    Learn about some signs of a potential stock market crash including a high level of margin debt, lots of IPOs, M&A activity and technical factors.
  4. Small Business

    Why Social Media Isn't Like The Dotcom Boom

    Many investors see social media stocks as a bubble waiting to burst. Find out why they're wrong.
  5. Insights

    Why Are Companies Taking Longer To Go Public?

    Learn why private companies are waiting longer to have their IPOs. Understand why it may be more advantageous for a company to stay private.
  6. Insights

    The Greatest Market Crashes

    From a tulip craze to a dotcom bubble, read the cautionary tales of the stock market's greatest disasters.
  7. Investing

    Dotcom vs. Today: 3 Reasons Why U.S. Equities Are More Dangerous

    Explore the factors that make the end of the current bull market more dangerous than the dotcom bubble, and why investors may have no place to hide this time.
  8. Insights

    How Do Asset Bubbles Cause Recessions?

    Understand how asset bubbles often lead to deep, protracted recessions. Read about historical examples of recessions preceded by asset bubbles.
RELATED TERMS
  1. Paper Profit (Paper Loss)

    Unrealized capital gain (or capital loss) in an investment. It ...
  2. Initial Public Offering - IPO

    The first sale of stock by a private company to the public. IPOs ...
  3. Bubble Company

    A company whose valuation greatly exceeds that suggested by its ...
  4. Housing Bubble

    A housing bubble is a run-up in home prices fueled by demand, ...
  5. Bust

    A period of time during which economic growth decreases rapidly. ...
  6. Crash

    A sudden and significant decline in the value of a market. A ...
Hot Definitions
  1. Notional Value

    The total value of a leveraged position's assets. This term is commonly used in the options, futures and currency markets ...
  2. Interest Expense

    The cost incurred by an entity for borrowed funds. Interest expense is a non-operating expense shown on the income statement. ...
  3. Call Option

    An agreement that gives an investor the right (but not the obligation) to buy a stock, bond, commodity, or other instrument ...
  4. Pro-Rata

    Used to describe a proportionate allocation. A method of assigning an amount to a fraction, according to its share of the ...
  5. Private Placement

    The sale of securities to a relatively small number of select investors as a way of raising capital.
  6. AAA

    The highest possible rating assigned to the bonds of an issuer by credit rating agencies. An issuer that is rated AAA has ...
Trading Center