Why was Microsoft subject to antitrust charges in 1998?

By Andrew Beattie AAA
A:

On May 18, 1998, the Department of Justice filed antitrust charges against Microsoft (Nasdaq:MSFT ). The charges were brought to determine whether Microsoft's bundling of other programs into its operating system constituted monopolistic actions. The suit was brought following the browser wars that led to the collapse of Microsoft's top competitor, Netscape, which occurred when Microsoft began giving away its browser software for free. (To learn more, read Antitrust Defined.)

The case was plagued with problems, including questions about whether charges should have been brought against Microsoft in the first place. The argument proposed that if Microsoft was to be considered a monopoly, it was at best a non-coercive monopoly. People chose to run Microsoft Windows on their computers. With options like Unix, Linux and Macintosh, consumers demonstrated a preference for the convenience of Microsoft's Windows product. Windows may not have been the superior product, but it could run on a Toshiba laptop or on a Chinese clone. The ease of its installation allowed and its other bundled software to become the norm.

The government case accused Microsoft of making it difficult for consumers to install competing software on computers operated by Windows. If Microsoft was found to have made it unreasonably difficult for consumers to uninstall Internet Explorer and use a competing browser, the company's practices would be deemed anti-competitive. The case meandered along with accusations of misleading statements and all manner of courtroom distractions. Economists in support of Microsoft even published a full-page open letter to the U.S. president in major newspapers stating that antitrust laws hurt consumers as well as the success of domestic firms in global competition.

Despite the creative editing of videotapes, facts and emails, Microsoft lost. The ruling on April 3, 2000, called for Microsoft to divide the company in half, creating two companies that were to be called "baby bills". The operating system would would make up one half of the company and the software arm would make up the other. Before this could be achieved, however, the fangs were removed from the ruling during the appeals process. However, rather than being broken by the antitrust ruling, Microsoft saw its once invincible market share erode due to old-fashioned competition. As a result, many now wonder if bringing antitrust cases against non-coercive monopolies is merely a costly redundancy of work the free market can do at no charge.

(For more on this subject, read Monopolies: Corporate Triumph And Treachery.)

This question was answered by Andrew Beattie.

RELATED FAQS

  1. Where is cost of living lowest in the world?

    Learn how the cost of living is the lowest in India based on numbers derived from the CPI and organizations like Expatistan ...
  2. What were the "browser wars"?

    When Netscape had its public offering on August 10, 1995, a last minute decision prompted the company to raise the offering ...
  3. What is the Mont Pelerin Society?

    The Mont Pelerin Society was formed in 1947 when economist Friedrich von Hayek invited 39 people to meet at Mont Pelerin ...
  4. Does perfect competition exist in the real world?

    First, let's review what economic factors must be present in an industry with perfect competition: 1. All firms sell an identical ...
RELATED TERMS
  1. Kickback

    The payment of something of value to an individual with the goal ...
  2. Copyright Infringement

    The use or production of copyright protected material without ...
  3. Net Neutrality

    Network neutrality requires all Internet service providers (ISPs) ...
  4. Net Neutrality

    The idea that all data on the internet should be treated equally ...
  5. Multibank Holding Company

    A company that owns or controls two or more banks. Mutlibank ...
  6. Short Put

    A type of strategy regarding a put option, which is a contract ...
comments powered by Disqus
Related Articles
  1. The Top Technical Indicators For Options ...
    Options & Futures

    The Top Technical Indicators For Options ...

  2. How To Buy Oil Options
    Options & Futures

    How To Buy Oil Options

  3. How Influential Economists Changed Our ...
    Fundamental Analysis

    How Influential Economists Changed Our ...

  4. How Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac Were ...
    Economics

    How Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac Were ...

  5. Don't Get Sued: 5 Tips To Protect Your ...
    Entrepreneurship

    Don't Get Sued: 5 Tips To Protect Your ...

Trading Center