Why was Microsoft subject to antitrust charges in 1998?

By Andrew Beattie AAA
A:

On May 18, 1998, the Department of Justice filed antitrust charges against Microsoft (Nasdaq:MSFT ). The charges were brought to determine whether Microsoft's bundling of other programs into its operating system constituted monopolistic actions. The suit was brought following the browser wars that led to the collapse of Microsoft's top competitor, Netscape, which occurred when Microsoft began giving away its browser software for free. (To learn more, read Antitrust Defined.)

The case was plagued with problems, including questions about whether charges should have been brought against Microsoft in the first place. The argument proposed that if Microsoft was to be considered a monopoly, it was at best a non-coercive monopoly. People chose to run Microsoft Windows on their computers. With options like Unix, Linux and Macintosh, consumers demonstrated a preference for the convenience of Microsoft's Windows product. Windows may not have been the superior product, but it could run on a Toshiba laptop or on a Chinese clone. The ease of its installation allowed and its other bundled software to become the norm.

The government case accused Microsoft of making it difficult for consumers to install competing software on computers operated by Windows. If Microsoft was found to have made it unreasonably difficult for consumers to uninstall Internet Explorer and use a competing browser, the company's practices would be deemed anti-competitive. The case meandered along with accusations of misleading statements and all manner of courtroom distractions. Economists in support of Microsoft even published a full-page open letter to the U.S. president in major newspapers stating that antitrust laws hurt consumers as well as the success of domestic firms in global competition.

Despite the creative editing of videotapes, facts and emails, Microsoft lost. The ruling on April 3, 2000, called for Microsoft to divide the company in half, creating two companies that were to be called "baby bills". The operating system would would make up one half of the company and the software arm would make up the other. Before this could be achieved, however, the fangs were removed from the ruling during the appeals process. However, rather than being broken by the antitrust ruling, Microsoft saw its once invincible market share erode due to old-fashioned competition. As a result, many now wonder if bringing antitrust cases against non-coercive monopolies is merely a costly redundancy of work the free market can do at no charge.

(For more on this subject, read Monopolies: Corporate Triumph And Treachery.)

This question was answered by Andrew Beattie.

RELATED FAQS

  1. What are the most common momentum oscillators used in options trading?

    Read about some of the most common technical momentum oscillators that options traders use, and learn why momentum is a critical ...
  2. How are Bollinger Bands® used in options trading?

    Use Bollinger Bands to identify volatility changes and place options trades at the right time; profit in bull or bear markets ...
  3. What's the difference between legal defalcation and illegal defalcation?

    Discover what is meant by the term ''defalcation'' and how it can be used in multiple contexts to describe illegal or legal ...
  4. Where is cost of living lowest in the world?

    Learn how the cost of living is the lowest in India based on numbers derived from the CPI and organizations like Expatistan ...
RELATED TERMS
  1. Duty Of Loyalty

    A director's responsibility to act at all times in the best interests ...
  2. Duty Of Care

    One of two primary fiduciary duties of directors, the duty of ...
  3. Adverse Domination

    A legal doctrine that allows regulators to bring litigation against ...
  4. Kickback

    The payment of something of value to an individual with the goal ...
  5. Copyright Infringement

    The use or production of copyright protected material without ...
  6. Net Neutrality

    The idea that all data on the internet should be treated equally ...

You May Also Like

Related Articles
  1. Options & Futures

    Stock Futures vs Stock Options

  2. First time stock investors may ask, is there any way to buy insurance on stocks to prevent losses?
    Options & Futures

    Stock Safety: Top 3 Ways to Limit Your ...

  3. Options & Futures

    Applying Binary Options To Equity Markets

  4. Investors can use derivative securities to effectively buy insurance on their individual holdings or on their portfolio as a whole.
    Options & Futures

    Can You Buy Stock Insurace? 3 Strategies ...

  5. With more ETFs to trade, the risks associated with these investments have grown. To mitigate these risks, ETF options are a hedging strategy for traders.
    Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Options Hedge Risk of ETF Trades

Trading Center