Why was Microsoft subject to antitrust charges in 1998?

By Andrew Beattie AAA
A:

On May 18, 1998, the Department of Justice filed antitrust charges against Microsoft (Nasdaq:MSFT ). The charges were brought to determine whether Microsoft's bundling of other programs into its operating system constituted monopolistic actions. The suit was brought following the browser wars that led to the collapse of Microsoft's top competitor, Netscape, which occurred when Microsoft began giving away its browser software for free. (To learn more, read Antitrust Defined.)

The case was plagued with problems, including questions about whether charges should have been brought against Microsoft in the first place. The argument proposed that if Microsoft was to be considered a monopoly, it was at best a non-coercive monopoly. People chose to run Microsoft Windows on their computers. With options like Unix, Linux and Macintosh, consumers demonstrated a preference for the convenience of Microsoft's Windows product. Windows may not have been the superior product, but it could run on a Toshiba laptop or on a Chinese clone. The ease of its installation allowed and its other bundled software to become the norm.

The government case accused Microsoft of making it difficult for consumers to install competing software on computers operated by Windows. If Microsoft was found to have made it unreasonably difficult for consumers to uninstall Internet Explorer and use a competing browser, the company's practices would be deemed anti-competitive. The case meandered along with accusations of misleading statements and all manner of courtroom distractions. Economists in support of Microsoft even published a full-page open letter to the U.S. president in major newspapers stating that antitrust laws hurt consumers as well as the success of domestic firms in global competition.

Despite the creative editing of videotapes, facts and emails, Microsoft lost. The ruling on April 3, 2000, called for Microsoft to divide the company in half, creating two companies that were to be called "baby bills". The operating system would would make up one half of the company and the software arm would make up the other. Before this could be achieved, however, the fangs were removed from the ruling during the appeals process. However, rather than being broken by the antitrust ruling, Microsoft saw its once invincible market share erode due to old-fashioned competition. As a result, many now wonder if bringing antitrust cases against non-coercive monopolies is merely a costly redundancy of work the free market can do at no charge.

(For more on this subject, read Monopolies: Corporate Triumph And Treachery.)

This question was answered by Andrew Beattie.

RELATED FAQS

  1. Why are oligopolies legal while monopolies are not?

    Learn about oligopolies and monopolies. Explore situations where anti-competitive practices have led to intervention by the ...
  2. Why are microeconomic models different in the short run than the long run

    Find out why short-run and long-run microeconomic models treat production, costs and variable change using different given ...
  3. How does the law of supply and demand affect prices?

    Learn what the law of supply and demand is, what relationship it has with prices, and how the law of supply and demand affects ...
  4. What are the arguments against using ceteris paribus assumptions in economics?

    Learn about some of the major objections about the widespread use of ceteris paribus assumptions in contemporary mainstream ...
RELATED TERMS
  1. Catastrophe Equity Put (CatEPut)

    Catastrophe equity puts are used to ensure that insurance companies ...
  2. Open Trade Equity (OTE)

    Open trade equity (OTE) is the equity in an open futures contract.
  3. Bad Faith Insurance

    An insurance company’s appalling or malicious refusal to pay ...
  4. UDAAP

    Misleading or harmful behaviors by those who offer financial ...
  5. Computer Crime Insurance

    An insurance policy that provides protection from crimes committed ...
  6. Duty Of Loyalty

    A director's responsibility to act at all times in the best interests ...

You May Also Like

Related Articles
  1. Economics

    Why are oligopolies legal while monopolies ...

  2. Options & Futures

    Trade Covered Calls On High Dividend ...

  3. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    How do I invest or trade market indicators?

  4. Personal Finance

    Why Are Tesla Cars So Expensive?

  5. Trading Strategies

    Top Day Trading Instruments

Trading Center