A:

The dotcom boom accelerated many deceitful business practices that first became apparent during the '80s and '90s. Many of these had to do with analyst recommendations being tied with investment banking divisions' interests and other basic conflict of interest problems. One of the clearest examples of a firm putting its own interests above those of its clients was the conduct of the Knight Trading Group.

The Knight Trading Group acted as a market maker for brokerage firms, buying and selling the securities that made up client orders. In this capacity, Knight was handling up to 11% of all buy and sell orders on the Nasdaq during the dotcom boom. The trading group was supposed to facilitate more efficient execution of orders, allowing clients to buy and sell at as close to the current price quotes as possible. At the height of the bubble, Knight Group was often off the posted quotes and frequently late in executing trades, meaning that clients often lost money on trades while waiting for the orders to go through.

This tardiness was more sinister than mere incompetence or network difficulties. A NASD investigation revealed that the company was front running on client orders. The traders at the company would receive large client orders, often institutional, and execute the order in a company or personal portfolio before putting through the client's order. As large orders can push stocks sharply up in a volatile market like the dotcom boom, Knight was profiting from privileged information.

Such a revelation and an investigation took an immediate toll on the company's shares, sending the stock down close to 30%. Because market makers' worth is tied to their reputation, the company's shareholders also launched a lawsuit because the traders' actions and management's lack of oversight destroyed the shareholders' investment. Knight Trading Group was assessed a $1.5 million fine on January 7, 2002, but it continued to face ongoing litigation and damage to its reputation.

For more, see The Biggest Stock Scams Of All Time.

This question was answered by Andrew Beattie.

RELATED FAQS

  1. What are some high-profile examples of wash trading schemes?

    Examine the RBC Bank wash trading case and explore the potential wash trading challenges presented by high-frequency trading ...
  2. What are examples of inherent risk?

    Explore two famous examples of inherent risk with the collapse and ultimate bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers and the downfall ...
  3. What is the difference between wash trading and insider trading?

    Explore the differences between two trading practices, wash trading and insider trading, and find out why these practices ...
  4. What impact did the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have on corporate governance in the United ...

    Learn the effects the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has on corporate governance in the United States, including strict disclosures, ...
RELATED TERMS
  1. Financial Action Task Force (FATF)

    An intergovernmental organization that designs and promotes policies ...
  2. Banker Trojan

    A malicious computer program designed to gain access to confidential ...
  3. Black Market

    Economic activity that takes place outside government-sanctioned ...
  4. Bear Raid

    The illegal practice of ganging up to push a stock's price lower ...
  5. Cookie Jar Accounting

    A disingenuous accounting practice in which periods of good financial ...
  6. Financial Shenanigans

    Acts or actions designed to mask or misrepresent the true financial ...

You May Also Like

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    A New Economic Threat: State-Sponsored ...

  2. Investing News

    Will Bitcoin And Walmart Force Western ...

  3. Active Trading

    What Is A Pyramid Scheme?

  4. Trading Strategies

    What Is The Difference Between After-Hours ...

  5. Stock Analysis

    Bernie "Made-off" With Banks' Billions

Trading Center
×

You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!