A:

"If you're so smart, how come you're not rich?" is a question that economists seem to invite. If they can explain the intricacies of economies and worldwide markets, surely they could make a killing in the stock market. This is often not the case. One disadvantage economists have is that their profession deals heavily with theoretical, rather than practical, studies. They are often encouraged to oversimplify variables in order to make models work. This works for academia, but investors often find that the devil is in the details.

Theoretical economists of the model making variety have made large amounts of money working as quants, but when the market strays from the model, as it did with LTCM, the gains can quickly vanish. Economists in these jobs usually make their wealth via a salary payment like their academic counterparts rather from stock gains.

A select number if economists have made fortunes as pure stock investors. Many economists, even Karl Marx, have put on the hat of the stock speculator. The two richest economists in history, thus far, were investors. John Maynard Keynes made a fortune in the 1920s, and lost it in the crash, only to build another fortune by snapping up stocks in the aftermath. He died a millionaire, not as the richest economist. (Read more about Keynes in our article, Giants of Finance: John Maynard Keynes.)

That honor belongs to David Ricardo (1772-1823), a British economist who was also a bond trader – there were no stocks other than the East India Company during his lifetime. Ricardo was a master of arbitrage and made a fortune exploiting differences in pricing between comparable government bonds. Foreshadowing Keynes, Ricardo was also highly contrarian. By buying up British war bonds when they were selling at a steep discount due to Napoleon's victories, Ricardo is said to have made 1 million pounds when Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo. So, while the majority of economist are not exceedingly rich despite their training, some have definitely lived up to the high expectations.

This question was answered by Andrew Beattie.

RELATED FAQS

  1. When has the United States run its largest trade deficits?

    Learn in what year the United States ran its largest negative balance of trade as a result of imports greatly exceeding the ...
  2. Which is more important to a nation's economy, the balance of trade or the balance ...

    Learn how to differentiate between the balance of trade and balance of payments for international trade and why the balance ...
  3. What are the ethical arguments against government subsidies to companies like Tesla?

    Learn about the ethical argument behind government subsidies.
  4. How can tariffs cause inefficiencies in domestic industries?

    Understand what a tariff is and why a government would want to impose a tariff. Learn how tariffs can contribute to domestic ...
RELATED TERMS
  1. Optimal Currency Area

    The geographic area in which a single currency would create the ...
  2. European Monetary System - EMS

    A 1979 arrangement between several European countries which links ...
  3. European Sovereign Debt Crisis

    A period of time in which several European countries faced the ...
  4. European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)

    The successor to the European Monetary System (EMS), the combination ...
  5. Nordic Model

    The social welfare and economic systems adopted by Nordic countries.
  6. Welfare Capitalism

    Definition of welfare capitalism.

You May Also Like

Related Articles
  1. Economics

    Is Texas The Future Of America?

  2. Economics

    10 Most Influential Chinese Companies

  3. Stock Analysis

    Is Now the Time to Bet on Vacation Spending?

  4. Economics

    Why Israel Is Attracting Chinese Investors

  5. Economics

    Venezuela: Portrait of a Country in ...

Trading Center
×

You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!