A:

The Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS) was formed in the 1950s to make certain that the Pacific Northwest had a constant source of electrical power. The Packwood Lake Dam was the first project undertaken by the WPPSS, and ran seven months past the completion date; this first project by WPPSS foreshadowed its future incompetence in public works.

The idea to use clean, cheap nuclear power became popular in the 1960s and WPPSS saw an opportunity to meet growing consumption demands in the Northwest. It planned a system of five nuclear power plants that would be financed by a public issue of bonds and repaid with sales from the plants. The bonds were issued, but the robust sales that WPPSS had intended never materialized.

The biggest problems were endemic cost overruns, sloppy management and outright idiocy. An example of WPPSS's problems involved a pipe hanger, essentially a bracket to hold pipes in place, that was redesigned and rebuilt no less than 17 times, costing more with each revision. Contractors, long accustomed to government efficiency, overcharged and under-delivered in almost every category. This caused safety inspectors to call for more stringent rules, which were implemented mid-construction by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. As a result of the tougher regulations, much of what had been built needed to be torn down and redesigned.

At the beginning of the 1980s, only one of the five WPPSS plants was nearing completion. By this time, nuclear power had been reexamined and was found to not be as clean as was originally thought. Some cities boycotted nuclear power from the plants before the facilities were even up and running. The cost overruns reached the point where more than $24 billion would be required to complete the work, but recouping funds would be a tricky matter because of less-than-promising sales. Construction halted on all but the near-completed second plant; the first plant was once again being redesigned. WPPSS was forced to default on $2.25 billion worth of municipal bonds.

The second plant eventually went into operation in 1984, but it was a small comfort to investors. On Christmas Eve in 1988, a $753 million settlement was reached. The structure of the settlement meant that investors received between 10 and 40 cents per dollar invested ... Whoops indeed.

(For more on this topic, read The Basics of Municipal Bonds.)

This question was answered by Andrew Beattie.

RELATED FAQS
  1. What has been the trend for growth in nuclear power in the utilities sector?

    Explore the current state of the nuclear power industry, and learn the consensus of opinion regarding growth prospects for ... Read Answer >>
  2. What do cities do with the funds generated from municipal bonds?

    Learn more about municipal bonds, including the various types of bonds issued and the purposes of municipal bond funds, such ... Read Answer >>
  3. How do the returns on municipal bonds compare to those of other bonds?

    Learn how tax-free municipal bonds may provide better returns than other types of bonds, and understand the risks of municipal ... Read Answer >>
  4. What is a triple tax-free municipal bond?

    At its core, a triple tax-free municipal bond is just like any corporate bond: it is a debt instrument, a loan given to a ... Read Answer >>
  5. What is the difference between municipal bonds and standard money market funds?

    The primary difference between municipal bonds - also known as "munis" - and money market funds is that municipal bonds are ... Read Answer >>
  6. How stable are municipal bonds?

    Read about the safety and stability of the municipal bond market, and learn how that stability has been undermined since ... Read Answer >>
Related Articles
  1. Investing

    The Economic Reasons Behind Nuclear Power

    Despite the risks, investments in nuclear energy can pay off in the form of energy independence.
  2. Economics

    Companies Involved In A Nuclear Cleanup

    Learn about the specialized companies that are equipped to assist in a nuclear cleanup.
  3. Stock Analysis

    Japan's Quake Won't Kill Nuclear Power

    Japan's disaster has exposed the extreme downside of nuclear power, but it's way too early to assume nuclear has seen its last days.
  4. Stock Analysis

    3 Nuclear Energy Projects That Could Begin Soon

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved a generic environmental impact statement a few weeks ago. The statement is in response a 2012 U.S. Court of Appeals ruling, and it clears the way for ...
  5. Stock Analysis

    Nuclear Energy Of The Future

    Recent discussion has focused on expanding the nuclear energy capabilities within the United States.
  6. Stock Analysis

    Earn 27% With This Beaten-Down Energy Stock

    It has been more than three years since the Fukushima nuclear power plant was crippled by a tsunami, spewing radioactive material into the environment. Similar to the way in which nuclear radiation ...
  7. Stock Analysis

    The Basics of FuelCell's Cost Share Carbon Reduction Project (FCEL)

    Discover how FuelCell Energy's carbon capture project with the Department of Energy works and how it could lead to cleaner air and huge profits.
  8. Investing Basics

    The Industry Handbook: The Utilties Industry

    You've probably noticed that the utilities industry is not quite what it used to be. Once considered the quintessential safe widow-and-orphan stocks, electricity companies are undergoing ...
  9. Stock Analysis

    Shaw Group Still Looking For More Energy

    Shaw is seeing slow improvements in its power business. While the large power plant maintenance business is a plus, investors will need to be patient to realize the value in this stock.
  10. Investing

    Why Now Is The Time To Buy This Hated Commodity

    <p>The recent plunge in oil prices is just the latest bit of bad news for investors in commodities. Slumping Chinese demand for iron ore, co...
RELATED TERMS
  1. Whoops

    Slang for the Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS), ...
  2. Nuclear Hazards Clause

    Property insurance policy language that excludes from coverage ...
  3. Filthy Five

    A series of power plants located in Massachusetts. The Filthy ...
  4. Project Completion Restriction

    A type of clause, seen most often in municipal bond indentures, ...
  5. Revenue Bond

    A municipal bond supported by the revenue from a specific project, ...
  6. Municipal Bond Fund

    A mutual fund that invests in municipal bonds, or "munis." Municipal ...
Hot Definitions
  1. MACD Technical Indicator

    Moving Average Convergence Divergence (or MACD) is a trend-following momentum indicator that shows the relationship between ...
  2. Over-The-Counter - OTC

    Over-The-Counter (or OTC) is a security traded in some context other than on a formal exchange such as the NYSE, TSX, AMEX, ...
  3. Quarter - Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4

    A three-month period on a financial calendar that acts as a basis for the reporting of earnings and the paying of dividends.
  4. Weighted Average Cost Of Capital - WACC

    Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is a calculation of a firm's cost of capital in which each category of capital is ...
  5. Basis Point (BPS)

    A unit that is equal to 1/100th of 1%, and is used to denote the change in a financial instrument. The basis point is commonly ...
  6. Sharing Economy

    An economic model in which individuals are able to borrow or rent assets owned by someone else.
Trading Center