According to a January 23 article in the Vancouver Sun, the 2010 Winter Olympics are costing Vancouver (and Canada) as much as $6 billion (depending on whom you ask). It's big money that the city expects to recoup. But is that likely to happen?

The Olympics have long been assumed to provide an economic boost to the host city. And although the economic impact can be hard to quantify, studies show that the benefits are substantial. There are unique benefits surrounding the three different phases of the Olympic games: the pre-event phase, the event phase and the post-Event phase. Overall, economic boosts to the local and regional economies are well documented. And in cities within smaller countries, there is evidence of a boost to national economic output as well.

Pre-Event Phase
The pre-event phase of any Olympics includes the building of infrastructure, including new roads, airports or airport enhancements, rail lines, housing (such as the Olympic village), additional hotels, and any other venue or transportation facility deemed necessary for the successful operations of the Olympic games. These additional expenditures are easily calculated, including the number of additional jobs created, output generated, and costs incurred. Provided these funds flow to local architects, contractors, builders, employees, etc., the economic impact can be readily calculated. However, when calculating the costs or benefits of this phase, one must make sure to only take the net effect of the Olympic games rather than the gross expenditures during the same period. For example, many of the infrastructure projects completed in Vancouver for the 2010 games were already scheduled even before Vancouver was named as the host city. These specific projects would have to be netted out to determine the Olympic-specific expenditures. (Find out how to capitalize on this phase in Build Your Portfolio With Infrastructure Investments.)

Event Phase
The event phase of the Olympics includes an entire year surrounding the actual games. In the period between six months before and six months after the Olympic events, there are certain activities that occur that can be directly attributable to the games themselves. But the majority of the economic benefit during this phase is the arrival of hundreds of thousands of visitors in the form of spectators, sponsors, athletes, media, etc. While we can assume that there may be certain tourists that would avoid the host city during the Olympic games, the dramatic increase in visitors typically results in a net positive effect to the local economy, and as stated in the opening paragraph, to the national economy when the host country is relatively small.

Post-Event Phase
Although there is general consensus that the economic benefits of hosting the Olympic games are generally positive for years after the Olympics, it is hard to quantify this number. For example, how would the improved productivity of new roads built for the Olympics be calculated for the cities' residents for future years? How would the increase in tourism following the event be calculated, and what amount can be attributed to the increased exposure the host city received? What about the economic benefits of increased housing? Or even the new athletic facilities?

Before 1976, there weren't many studies of the economic benefits of hosting the Olympic Games. After the Montreal games in 1976, in which that city realized a considerable budgetary shortfall that was paid for through a tobacco tax over 30 years. Since then, the Olympics has become more commercialized through the development of global Olympic sponsorship deals. A study by PriceWaterhouse Coopers of summer Olympic games held from 1984 to 2000 showed varying degrees of measurable economic success. All the hosting cities had a positive economic benefit from hosting the Olympics, but the range as a percent of GDP was considerable. Barcelona had an estimated economic benefit of 0.03% of regional GDP, while Sydney had an estimated economic benefit of 2.78% of regional GDP. (Atlanta, 2.41% of regional GDP, Seoul, 1.4% of national GDP, and Los Angeles, 0.47% of regional GDP). Similar comparisons for the winter Olympics are hard to come by, but it's a smaller event overall with considerably fewer sports, so it may be assumed that its impact would be smaller as well.

Cities often tout the economic benefits that hosting an Olympics will bring. But while this is generally assumed to be true, the wide range of estimates - both for the cost and the projected economic benefits - of the ongoing Vancouver Olympic Games suggests that the benefit of loss is not so easy to pin down. The current Olympics has been both warmly embraced and vociferously protested, largely on economic grounds, but the jury's still out on whether it will be a cash cow or an economic hardship for this host city.

Related Articles
  1. Economics

    A Look at Greece’s Messy Fiscal Policy

    Investigate the muddy fiscal policy, tax problems, and inability to institute austerity that created the Greek crises in 2010 and 2015.
  2. Economics

    How Do Asset Bubbles Cause Recessions?

    Understand how asset bubbles often lead to deep, protracted recessions. Read about historical examples of recessions preceded by asset bubbles.
  3. Investing News

    What Shook the U.S. Stock Market Today?

    What was looking as a decent year for US Stock market has suddenly gone off track as the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged 531 points in the week ending August 23, 2015.
  4. Professionals

    Why Investors Should Consider Cash Right Now

    With so many market watchers thinking that the current stock rally is getting long in the tooth, investors might considering upping their cash holdings.
  5. Stock Analysis

    How GM Keeps on Truckin'

    Following a giant bailout and a giant IPO, the new GM is carried by sales of its giant trucks. But is it profitable?
  6. Personal Finance

    The Future Outlook of the Golf Industry

    The popularity of golf peaked in 2003. To regain popularity and survive, the industry is adapting to appeal to a younger generation of players.
  7. Investing News

    Does the Empire State Index Signal a Recession?

    This morning, the New York Federal Reserve Bank reported the worst numbers in six years for its August 2015 Empire State Manufacturing Survey, indicating not only a potential economic slowdown ...
  8. Term

    The Legacy of Basel I

    Basel I refers to a set of international banking rules enacted in 1988 by the Basel Committee on Bank Supervision.
  9. Markets

    Should You Be a Bull or a Bear Right Now?

    Ask a bull: If the economy is truly improving, where's all the consumer spending?
  10. Stock Analysis

    Stay Away from These 10 Slumping Sectors

    You might want to stay away from these 10 lagging sectors. Far away.
  1. Hole-In-One Insurance

    A product that offers financial protection to golf tournament ...
  2. The New Deal

    A series of domestic programs designed to help the United States ...
  3. Merchandising

    Merchandising is any act of promoting goods or services for retail ...
  4. Global Recession

    An extended period of economic decline around the world. The ...
  5. The Great Recession

    The steep decline in economic activity during the late 2000s, ...
  6. Appraisal Management Company - ...

    An independent entity through which mortgage lenders order residential ...
  1. How does the risk of investing in the industrial sector compare to the broader market?

    There is increased risk when investing in the industrial sector compared to the broader market due to high debt loads and ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. How can I hedge my portfolio to protect from a decline in the retail sector?

    The retail sector provides growth investors with a great opportunity for better-than-average gains during periods of market ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What is the correlation between term structure of interest rates and recessions?

    There is no question that interest rates have enormous macroeconomic importance. Many economists and analysts believe the ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Why should an investor in the retail sector consider the Consumer Confidence Index?

    Investors in the retail sector should consider the Consumer Confidence Index, or CCI, because it measures how consumers feel ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Which type of retailers tend to perform best during weak periods in the economy?

    Retail is a broad investment sector comprising many different market segments, such as automotive, building supply, grocery ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What category of retailers will perform most strongly when the economy is doing well?

    When the economy is doing well, the market segments that perform best are volatile segments with products and services that ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center

You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!