The legislative colossus that is the Dodd-Frank Regulatory Reform Bill was promulgated with the intent of cleaning up the consequences of the past decade's financial sector decline. The Act runs approximately 2,300 pages, addressing a broad range of issues concerning financial institution reform within its 16 titles including systemic risk, disposition of insolvent financial institutions, insurance industry monitoring, proprietary trading in banks, derivatives (swaps in particular), investor and consumer protections. But what is the true fallout? Aren't the people charged with the clean up the very ones who presided over the debacle in the first place? The enormity of items to implement and the timeline over which to do so means that only history can judge whether the bill's intentions will be carried out. One thing is certain though: the road to reformation will be challenging. Talent Exodus
TUTORIAL: Credit Crisis
What the legislation will accomplish is impossible to know with complete certainly. The complex mess that played out was years in the making – so will it be years in the fixing. Deregulation, the advent and proliferation of derivatives, a powerful financial services lobby, what is now seen as the misjudgment of well-paced government functionaries and policy experts, and the elixir of credit at a price all played a role. What will be some of the potentially adverse consequences of attempting to stitch things up?
Financial institution compliance with the bill's numerous provisions will cost both time and money. A recent Economist piece cites the example of the Durbin Amendment's requirement of a drop in debit card fees which has cost banks $7 billion.
Institutions may either pare back or delay certain lucrative lines of business pending greater legal certainty.
The provision of the Volcker Rule (Title VI of the Act) limiting a bank's proprietary trading activities and separating traditional banking from other financial services could set off a flight of talent to the shadow banking sector, which is less within Dodd-Frank's remit.
Bank accountability and oversight, supervision and liquidation are given robust treatment; the regulation of the shadow banking system, where the conduct of bank-like activities goes on without similar rules, however, is not given the same treatment. An example is the sale and repurchase agreement, which is a systemically important parallel bank funding tool that is not given adequate regulatory treatment. Dealing with potential redemption risk of money market funds along the lines of what happened pursuant to the default of Lehman Brothers' commercial paper has yet to be addressed.
As the bill's resolution authority prohibits bail-outs of failed financial institutions, other options exist, such as liquidation, receivership, a division of the institution into a good and bad bank, with the former to be run by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), selling the good bank to another bank or recapitalization. Fears of counterparty risk and former bondholders carrying equity of questionable value could engender a sale of its and its competitors' shares.
The Act affords protection against retaliation and a bounty of up to 30% of an award that resulted from a tip. Until now, the risks of whistleblowing were seen as too great. For many, they probably will still be. While a potential benefit of the act, this activity could equally give rise to frivolous lawsuits.
Plus Ça Change
The legislation would appear to have achieved minimal regulatory consolidation. Indeed, it requires over 225 new rules across 11 federal agencies, giving the very regulators who seem to have fallen down during the crisis even greater authority. At the very least, this leads to uncertainty for the financial sector until the regulatory agencies address how this new gaggle of rules is to be implemented.
The Family Office Rule
The act repeals the private advisor exemption of the 1940 Investment Advisers Act, under which advisors with fewer than 15 clients who did not hold themselves out to the public as investment advisors would not come under the Act's requirements. To avoid the burdensome compliance requirements, family offices may give securities advice only to family clients; the family office must be owned and controlled only by family members or entities and the office may not hold itself out to the public as an investment adviser. Advisors with multiple family offices could be affected. In 2011, George Soros converted his Quantum hedge fund into a single family office, returning cash to his few remaining outside clients to avoid SEC registration and disclosure.
The Bottom Line
The foregoing list of potential and actual behavioral changes in response to Dodd-Frank is a sampling only. A thorough treatment of all of its provisions and their implications is beyond the scope of this article. Only time and experience will determine how well the various features of the Act will function when put to the test.
Investing BasicsLearn how Goldman Sachs has built a substantial presence in Salt Lake City. Read about another major financial institution also located in the area.
EconomicsFind out where former secretary of state and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton stands on the economy, jobs, trade and education.
Fundamental AnalysisA decision tree provides a comprehensive framework to review the alternative scenarios and consequences a decision may lead to.
Investing BasicsFind out what fiduciary duties a board of directors owes to the company and its shareholders, including the duties of care, good faith and loyalty.
Bonds & Fixed IncomeThis derivative can help manage portfolio risk, but it isn't a simple vehicle.
Investing NewsA look at what Affirmative Action means for your business.
InsuranceLearn more about the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and what happens to your deposits over $250,000 if a member bank fails.
InvestingFederally registering your brand name or logo offers the broadest protection against potential trademark infringement.
EconomicsA currency swap involves two parties exchanging a notional principal and interest to gain exposure to a desired currency.
EconomicsThe Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insures deposits in banks and thrift institutions.
Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, in conjunction with Congress, signed into law several major legislative responses ... Read Full Answer >>
Interest rate swaps are agreements where counter parties agree to exchange interest rate cash flows based upon the difference ... Read Full Answer >>
The main purpose of swap agreements is to swap cash flows between counterparties for a certain market or asset. Generally, ... Read Full Answer >>
Investment banks in the United States are continuously reviewed and regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, ... Read Full Answer >>
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) works as a protector for customers when banks and financial institutions ... Read Full Answer >>
When a third party gains access to your bank account and conducts transactions without your consent, the FDIC does not have ... Read Full Answer >>