You're not going to believe this, but corporate executives love to donate money to political campaigns. Well, they don't necessarily love it, but they prefer it to the alternative - having no impact on elections and ultimately, policy. While it's true that elections in the United States are purely democratic, and that a Wall Street CEO's vote counts as much as a welfare recipient's, a well-financed candidate does have an unmistakable advantage over a candidate who receives less in donations. The former can afford better advertising production, print more flyers and put more miles on his campaign bus. Those little differences can turn a weak candidate of sufficient malleability from a non-entity to a primary winner to an officeholder, all in short order. Grassroots candidates still exist - Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul continues to draw millions of dollars from private citizens - but such candidates rarely succeed on the national stage.
Cutting Big Checks
So, which corporations cut the largest checks with "influence" written in the memo field? At the top of the list is a company that was disassembled and sold for parts as a result of the biggest antitrust case in history - AT&T. The former monopoly, now known to a new generation exclusively as a mobile provider, has donated close to $50 million to candidates of both parties over the last 22 years, according to OpenSecrets.org. Not surprisingly, for a company with tens of millions of customers and a public image to uphold, AT&T's donation breakdown by party has been close to even. The company's largest individual recipient in the last election cycle was John Boehner, the Republican Speaker of the House; but the next name on the list is that of President Obama, a Democrat.

Here's something that'll delight both Democrat and Republican fans of investment bankers receiving taxpayer largesse: Over the same period listed above, the next most "generous" company in America is Goldman Sachs (to the extent that it's easy to donate money to incumbent candidates who direct just under $13 billion in taxpayer money your way according to USA Today.) The infamous Wall Street charity case donated over $37 million to political campaigns, its most recent large beneficiary being Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney (again, followed by President Obama). If you wonder why an entity would donate money to both the incumbent and to his presumptive opponent, instead of just donating to neither … unfortunately, that's politics.

Citigroup received $25 billion in 2008's Troubled Asset Relief Program, according to the Wall Street Journal, making it easy to return a small percentage of such in political donations. Citigroup's two largest recent individual recipients, like Goldman Sachs's, are also Romney and Obama (in the same order.) Citigroup's donations are split almost exactly down the middle between the parties.

UPS Donates
What can brown do for you? Plenty of green, if you're sufficiently connected. United Parcel Service is second only to AT&T among non-TARP beneficiaries on the list of corporate political donors, and is fourth overall. UPS focuses on races further down the ballot, and in more modest amounts. In the last year it specialized in four-digit donations, and those almost exclusively to candidates for the House of Representatives. Not surprisingly, almost all of that money went to incumbents. There's a reason why turnover on Capitol Hill is about as infrequent as it was in the old Soviet Politburo.

No major corporate contributor quite skews its donations to one party as does the next company on the list, Altria. The maker of cigarette brands such as Marlboro and Benson & Hedges, Altria gave $18.7 million to Republican candidates and about $7 million to Democratic candidates. Perhaps tobacco companies are less interested in public perception than are the other companies who split their donations evenly. Altria could afford to sow some political goodwill after the colossal $246 billion tobacco settlements of 1998.

If there's anything noteworthy about the corporations that donate the most money to political candidates, it's how few industries they represent and which industries are largely absent. Two of the next three on the list are yet more investment banks (and TARP recipients), JPMorgan Chase at $24 million and Morgan Stanley at $22 million. They sandwich Microsoft, the defendant in one of the largest cases ever undertaken by the Department of Justice. Fellow tech mammoths Google and Apple remain largely absent. In order, the next few companies that appear are investment bank Morgan Stanley, media conglomerate Time Warner, then Blue Cross/Blue Shield, Lockheed Martin, General Electric, Verizon and Bank of America.

The Bottom Line
Again, we're only discussing donations from corporations to candidates. Which doesn't even begin to cover all the political money in the system. We're excluding corporate executives' personal donations, and those to entities other than candidates. If a high-powered CEO wants to donate a few million to a political action committee, or a party's own Senatorial or Congressional campaign committee, it doesn't show on our list.

If there's a lesson to take from this, it's that everyone has an agenda - and in a constitutional republic, money is the most efficient way to get that agenda into the consciousness of the decision makers.

Related Articles
  1. Credit & Loans

    Getting Government Loans For Your Small Business

    Would a government loan provide a more cost-effective way to finance your business? See whether your company qualifies for a government loan.
  2. Economics

    Will North and South Korea Ever Reunite?

    North and South Korea have been divided for over six decades. Some analysts think the two countries could reunify within the next 10 years.
  3. Economics

    The Top 9 Things to Know About Hillary Clinton's Economic View

    Find out where former secretary of state and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton stands on the economy, jobs, trade and education.
  4. Economics

    Is Argentina a Socialist Country?

    Find out why it does not really make sense to call Argentina a socialist country, even though the South American nation has many socialistic tendencies.
  5. Term

    What is the Macro Environment?

    The macro environment is the conditions existing in an economy as a whole, rather than in a single sector or region.
  6. Taxes

    What's Wrong with the American Tax System

    American's are highly taxed and we still run a deficit. We explain why.
  7. Economics

    How Does National Income Accounting Work?

    National income accounting is an economic term describing the system used by a country to gather data and determine aggregate economic activity.
  8. Investing Basics

    What's a Holding Company?

    A holding company is a corporation that owns enough voting stock in another company to control its management and policies.
  9. Economics

    What is a Free Rider Problem?

    In economics, the free rider problem refers to someone being able to get, for less or even for free, what others pay more for.
  10. Retirement

    How Much Medicaid and Medicare Cost Americans

    Medicaid & Medicare cost Americans plenty out of their paychecks. But how much, really? And what does that money buy?
RELATED TERMS
  1. Section 1231 Property

    A tax term relating to depreciable business property that has ...
  2. Emergency Banking Act Of 1933

    A bill passed during the administration of former U.S. President ...
  3. Gross Domestic Product - GDP

    The monetary value of all the finished goods and services produced ...
  4. Tenured Capital

    Loans offered by the government to key business sectors.
  5. The New Deal

    A series of domestic programs designed to help the United States ...
  6. Behavioral Modeling

    Using available and relevant consumer and business spending data ...
RELATED FAQS
  1. Where are the Social Security administration headquarters?

    The U.S. Social Security Administration, or SSA, is headquartered in Woodlawn, Maryland, a suburb just outside of Baltimore. ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the Social Security administration responsible for?

    The main responsibility of the U.S. Social Security Administration, or SSA, is overseeing the country's Social Security program. ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Is the Social Security administration a government corporation?

    The U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) is a government agency, not a government corporation. President Franklin Roosevelt ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does the role of Medicare/Medicaid affect the drugs sector in the U.S.?

    Medicare and Medicaid have enormous influence on the pharmaceutical, or drugs, sector in the United States. For instance, ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What are the ethical arguments against government subsidies to companies like Tesla?

    The ethical argument behind government subsidies is that they should be put into place to help industries that will, in turn, ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What do I do if I think an accountant is in violation of the Generally Accepted Accounting ...

    The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) promulgates generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
×

You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!