Price fixing allegations aren't anything new; investors can usually count on seeing a few threats lobbed at this or that industry every year. What's unusual in this case is that a form of digital media, often seen as the dragon slayer of entrenched controlled prices, is in the center of the fight. What's even more unusual is that Apple, a company often credited for spot-on sense of its customers' sentiments, is involved as well.

SEE: Antitrust Defined

A Warning Shot from the DOJ

The U.S. Department of Justice has recently warned Apple, as well as five traditional large publishing houses, that it intends to pursue a suit alleging antitrust/price-fixing behavior in the e-book market.

What this case ultimately boils down to is the allegation that these companies have essentially forced Amazon and other retailers to raise their prices on e-books. While Amazon has generally preferred to use a wholesale pricing model (where it decides the final price and the margin it wants), publishers have forced the company in many cases to adopt an agency model - a model where the publishers set the price and give a fixed percentage over to the retailer.

Certainly there is anecdotal evidence to support the accusation. E-book prices have been on a steady upward march; where e-books often used to be substantially cheaper than the physical versions, that gap has in many cases evaporated completely. While Amazon used to limit e-book prices to $9.99 in most cases, a squabble with Macmillan ultimately ended with Amazon raising the prices on those books to a range of $12.99 to $14.99.

Publishers Have Everything at Stake
It's not too hard to see why publishing houses want to take a firm hand with pricing. Simon & Schuster (owned by CBS), Hachette, Pearson's Penguin and News Corp's HarperCollins all saw what happened to the music industry when digital distribution took all the power out of the labels' hands.

Piracy has clearly had a major negative impact on the music industry, but so too has the ability to buy individual songs for, well, a song. Music labels used to be able to sell entire records for $10-plus and buyers just had to accept the fact that they were buying songs they didn't necessarily want or like in order to get the ones they did. Now buyers can just buy the songs they want for a buck apiece from online stores such as Apple's iTunes.

With production costs not falling nearly so fast, record labels have seen their profits disappear and several well-known labels have closed up shop as a result, and now it's the turn for the publishers.

A year ago, e-book sales were more than one-quarter of industry sales and that percentage is increasing at an accelerating rate. That makes the pricing, and profits, of e-books even more important. What's more, book publishers should be very much afraid of the possibility that textbook publishing "jumps the fence" and goes the e-route as well; those ridiculously over-priced textbooks are a gold mine for publishers, and one they can ill-afford to see devalued by cut-rate e-book pricing.

Apple's Role
It may seem a little strange that Apple is even involved in this squabble. After all, it's basically the same boat as Amazon - it makes a reader and sells content. Apple's involved because it has chosen to cooperate with the publishers; Apple introduced an agency model where the publishers set the prices and Apple got a 30% fee at a time when Amazon was still pushing its wholesaling model.

Ultimately, the threat to Amazon is pretty clear - if it doesn't play ball with the publishers, the publishers will take their books to more compliant retailers (like Apple) and Amazon won't have anything to sell. Maybe Amazon is a beloved online retailer, but the fact is that nobody shops at stores that do not sell what they want to buy.

For Apple, it would seem to be a no-lose proposition. Either Amazon plays hardball and risks losing titles to Apple, or Amazon gives in and they both collect very profitable fees with little threat of a price war.

The Bottom Line
So, how much of this really matters to investors in the end?

For starters, investors in publishing and media companies cannot afford not to watch these developments. The fights over who controls the signals (the content) and who sets the pricing is going to decide where the profits flow in the future. These fights may also take the industry in entirely new directions; while e-books cost very little to produce, publishers need those profits (they would argue) to promote writers, pay advances and otherwise survive in a world where reading is not what it used to be.

For Amazon, this is a battle about just how much independence the company can exercise in running its business. There has long been a delicate balancing act between suppliers and retailers (not just in publishing), and if suppliers think they can force retailers' hands when it comes to pricing, the e-commerce model could be in for some changes. Amazon is accustomed to being a game-changer, moving the power more towards the distributors and authors, but that could be up in the air if the DOJ fails to make its case.

Last, and by no means least, is Apple. Operationally, there may not be all that much at stake. The problem for Apple, though, is the value of its brand and its corporate image. Apple traffics heavily in its reputation as a "cool" company that really "gets" its customers. Well, if those customers come to believe that Apple is partially responsible for them having to pay more for e-books, that reputation may be at risk and Apple may find that it has to compete on the basis of features and value - a game it arguably cannot win in the long run, versus Samsung, HTC and others.

Related Articles
  1. Markets

    PEG Ratio Nails Down Value Stocks

    Learn how this simple calculation can help you determine a stock's earnings potential.
  2. Investing

    What’s the Difference Between Duration & Maturity?

    We look at the meaning of two terms that often get confused, duration and maturity, to set the record straight.
  3. Fundamental Analysis

    Buy Penny Stocks Using the Wisdom of Peter Lynch

    Are penny stocks any better than playing penny slots in Vegas? What if you used the fundamental analysis principles of Peter Lynch to pick penny stocks?
  4. Fundamental Analysis

    Are Amazon Profits Here to Stay?

    Amazon is starting to look like a steadily profitable company. Is this really the case? Should investors even be hoping for profitability?
  5. Personal Finance

    Wal-Mart vs. Target: Which One Is A Bigger Threat To Amazon?

    Walmart and Target both revealed multi-year plans to grow their businesses. Which of these two retailers is the biggest threat to Amazon?
  6. Fundamental Analysis

    Does Costco Have Room to Grow Its Margins?

    Costco has historically capped their margins well below industry standard. Might now be the time for them to raise them and potentially increase profitability?
  7. Markets

    Operating Cash Flow: Better Than Net Income?

    Differences between accrual accounting and cash flows show why net income is easier to manipulate.
  8. Fundamental Analysis

    Investment Banks: Not a Good Bet Right Now?

    Investment banks might appear safe to investors at the moment, but they're probably more dangerous than advertised.
  9. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Porter's 5 Forces on Facebook

    Read about how you can use Porter's five forces to analyze Facebook's competition. This simple methodology looks at several different factors or forces.
  10. Investing Basics

    Valuation Of A Preferred Stock

    To find the value of the preferred stock, each future dividend payment needs to be discounted back to the present, and then added together.
  1. What does low working capital say about a company's financial prospects?

    When a company has low working capital, it can mean one of two things. In most cases, low working capital means the business ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Do nonprofit organizations have working capital?

    Nonprofit organizations continuously face debate over how much money they bring in that is kept in reserve. These financial ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Can a company's working capital turnover ratio be negative?

    A company's working capital turnover ratio can be negative when a company's current liabilities exceed its current assets. ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Does working capital measure liquidity?

    Working capital is a commonly used metric, not only for a company’s liquidity but also for its operational efficiency and ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. How do I read and analyze an income statement?

    The income statement, also known as the profit and loss (P&L) statement, is the financial statement that depicts the ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Can working capital be too high?

    A company's working capital ratio can be too high in the sense that an excessively high ratio is generally considered an ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Hot Definitions
  1. Quick Ratio

    The quick ratio is an indicator of a company’s short-term liquidity. The quick ratio measures a company’s ability to meet ...
  2. Black Tuesday

    October 29, 1929, when the DJIA fell 12% - one of the largest one-day drops in stock market history. More than 16 million ...
  3. Black Monday

    October 19, 1987, when the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) lost almost 22% in a single day. That event marked the beginning ...
  4. Monetary Policy

    Monetary policy is the actions of a central bank, currency board or other regulatory committee that determine the size and ...
  5. Indemnity

    Indemnity is compensation for damages or loss. Indemnity in the legal sense may also refer to an exemption from liability ...
  6. Discount Bond

    A bond that is issued for less than its par (or face) value, or a bond currently trading for less than its par value in the ...
Trading Center