You're a responsible investor, striking the appropriate balance between aggression and conservatism when deciding where to place your money. So, that means you do what the textbooks recommend, and you buy shares of a mutual fund; but the choices can be overwhelming.

The Investment Company Institute, a trade association for mutual fund companies, notes that there are over 7,000 active mutual funds in the United States at any given time. Each fund has a professional manager, if not a management team, which makes the prospect of finding the best available manager a daunting one. What criteria do you use? Pedigree? Education? Reputation? Of course, none of that is quite as important as results.

S&P 500
We've all seen the news stories about monkeys in the zoo that pick stocks as successfully as (at least some) professional fund managers do. The dirty little secret of investment management is that, unlike almost any other field of quantifiable endeavor, the same names don't necessarily predominate year in and year out. This year's big winner might not be next year's big loser, but there's no guarantee it'll stay on top, either. For instance, Morgan Stanley's Focus Growth Fund was among the best-performing mutual funds of 2010. It gained over 23% that year, or almost double what the S&P 500 did.

That comes with a qualification. Dividing one entity's gain by another's and coming up with a number close to 2 doesn't necessarily mean that the former performed twice as well as the latter. If we're looking at prices, rather than just the increases in those prices, we have to include the original levels, before conducting our comparison. The Focus Growth Fund finished the year at 126% of the level it started the year in question at, while the comparable number for the S&P is 113%. From that perspective, the Focus Growth Fund outpaced the S&P by a considerably more mundane 11%, which is superb if not exactly "double." However, you can imagine that the Focus Growth Fund's manager doesn't brag that the fund "beat the S&P 500 by 11 whole percentage points!" which falls into a category of boasting that some investment advisors are guilty of.

The Spin
Nor would the manager mention that the fund fell 6% the subsequent year. That same year, the S&P went essentially unchanged. You have to go to the second place to the right of the decimal point to find any change in the index at all. The S&P fell .04 points in 2011, which means that using the same selective math as in the above example, the Focus Growth Fund did 1,600 times worse than the S&P over the year. Again, this is the kind of superlative that makes it into very few corporate biographies.

Every subpar performance by a mutual fund (and by extension, its manager) has a ready-made excuse. "If only this one particular sector had improved, our holdings would have beaten the market." "The December sell-off killed us, otherwise we'd have been right in the black." "Well, we had three years of abnormal growth, and were bound to crash back down to earth eventually: still, beating the market three out of four years is nothing to scoff at." It's only human nature for the funds' managers to accentuate the positive, while downplaying the negative.

Fees
There's a saying about another traditionally volatile investment, real estate: you make your money going in. To some extent, the same is true when selecting a mutual fund manager. While you have little control over what a mutual fund's year-over-year return is going to be, you have complete control over how much of your investment will go to its upkeep.

There isn't a fund manager alive who has enough faith in themselves that they're going to earn their living simply via stock appreciation. Instead, they each charge you a percentage up front: the fund's management expense ratio. The one constant for mutual fund investors, is knowing that they can subtract that ratio from their investment before calculating anything else. These ratios vary widely, so much so that some funds' expense ratios are 37 times the size of others.

That being said, there are perfectly valid reasons for one fund to charge 1.85% while another charges .05%. The former might invest in multiple countries, requiring it to hire employees across the globe. Generally speaking, a lower expense ratio means a more firmly entrenched, larger fund. (And thus a more conservative one. There exist funds with a disproportionate focus on penny stocks, but as you might imagine, those funds never grow large enough to be major players.)

The world's largest fund, the PIMCO Total Return Fund, contains a quarter-trillion dollars' worth of low-risk bonds. It gained a solid, if unspectacular, 6.22% over the past year, and an annualized 6.90% over the past decade. The expense ratio is on the low side at .46%. The fund's manager, Bill Gross, is the very antipode of a brash Wall Street whippersnapper: he's been managing the fund for 41 years, and he even lives on the opposite coast from New York. Though, that's just one example.

The Bottom Line
Experience counts in fund management, and not just for the obvious reason. Not only do the incompetent managers not stick around long enough to become veterans, but the veterans have enough assets on hand that they can afford to charge low expense ratios. Self-fulfilling? Perhaps, but not at all irrelevant. Even though we're already three months in, no one can say with certainty who 2012's top-performing fund managers will be. Yet, we can say that the ones who make it the easiest for us to buy their offerings (and their expertise) have an inherent advantage.

Related Articles
  1. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Who Is the Manager of Your Mutual Fund?

    Find out why who is running your mutual fund matters, why it's so difficult to beat the market consistently and what the real role of a manager is.
  2. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Top 3 Lazard Funds for Retirement Diversification in 2016

    Learn about Lazard Asset Management, its long history of strong performance and the top three Lazard funds to consider for retirement diversification.
  3. Investing

    3 Healthy Financial Habits for 2016

    ”Winning” investors don't just set it and forget it. They consistently take steps to adapt their investment plan in the face of changing markets.
  4. Investing

    How to Ballast a Portfolio with Bonds

    If January and early February performance is any guide, there’s a new normal in financial markets today: Heightened volatility.
  5. Investing Basics

    How liquid are Fidelity mutual funds?

    Review the liquidity features of mutual fund shares and an overview of Fidelity mutual funds. Most investors look for convenient access to their investments.
  6. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Which Fund Share Class is Best for Retirement?

    Mutual funds are a popular investment for retirement. Here's how to choose the best share class when investing in them.
  7. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Top 5 Wellington Funds for Retirement Diversification in 2016

    Discover the top five Wellington Management funds for retirement diversification in 2016, with a summary and performance details of each fund.
  8. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    3 Morgan Stanley Funds Rated 5 Stars by Morningstar

    Discover the three best mutual funds administered and managed by Morgan Stanley that received five-star overall ratings from Morningstar.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Top 3 Voya Funds for Retirement Diversification in 2016

    Learn about Voya Investment Management's mutual fund offerings and the three Voya funds to consider for retirement diversification in 2016.
  10. Retirement

    Smart Ways to Tap Your Retirement Portfolio

    A rundown of strategies, from what to liquidate first to how much to withdraw, along with their tax consquences.
RELATED FAQS
  1. Are target-date retirement funds good investments?

    The main benefit of target-date retirement funds is convenience. If you really don't want to bother with your retirement ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Do mutual funds require a demat account?

    A dematerialized account enables electronic transfer of funds. The account is used so an investor does not need to hold the ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How liquid are Vanguard mutual funds?

    The Vanguard mutual fund family is one of the largest and most well-recognized fund family in the financial industry. Its ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Which mutual funds made money in 2008?

    Out of the 2,800 mutual funds that Morningstar, Inc., the leading provider of independent investment research in North America, ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Does OptionsHouse have mutual funds?

    OptionsHouse has access to some mutual funds, but it depends on the fund in which the investor is looking to buy shares. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Should mutual funds be subject to more regulation?

    Mutual funds, when compared to other types of pooled investments such as hedge funds, have very strict regulations. In fact, ... Read Full Answer >>
Hot Definitions
  1. Black Swan

    An event or occurrence that deviates beyond what is normally expected of a situation and that would be extremely difficult ...
  2. Inverted Yield Curve

    An interest rate environment in which long-term debt instruments have a lower yield than short-term debt instruments of the ...
  3. Socially Responsible Investment - SRI

    An investment that is considered socially responsible because of the nature of the business the company conducts. Common ...
  4. Presidential Election Cycle (Theory)

    A theory developed by Yale Hirsch that states that U.S. stock markets are weakest in the year following the election of a ...
  5. Super Bowl Indicator

    An indicator based on the belief that a Super Bowl win for a team from the old AFL (AFC division) foretells a decline in ...
Trading Center