Americans are sort of accustomed to having things their way. Whether it's actors, musicians, entrepreneurs or what have you, the belief (at least among Americans) has often been that you have to make it in America to really make it. So, what should investors make of the fact that many companies, including well-known names like Samsung, Nestle and Industrial and Commercial Bank Of Japan see no need to have fully-listed shares trading on U.S. exchanges?

Different Levels of Access
To be more precise, there are varying degrees of the extent to which many of these major international companies participate in the U.S. market. Many European and Asian companies (including Nestle, Daimler and Volkswagen)
do trade as American depository receipts (ADRs), and many of these companies do actively engage American investors (including press releases in English and so forth). What's more, while many companies have delisted from U.S. exchanges in recent years, most of those shares remain relatively liquid as sponsored ADRs.

There are many others, though, that are only available as a"F" shares (including Samsung, Hyundai Motors and Rosneft) and these shares are not only illiquid, but may be subject to surcharges from your broker to buy or sell shares. Moreover, information is not so readily available from these companies. Even in the case of sponsored ADR programs, there are differences and eccentricities that investors have to accept – the
companies' filling and disclosure rules are different and investors may well have fewer protections and legal options, should management act against investor interests.

This Transition Says Good Things About the World
That many overseas companies feel comfortable ignoring or delisting from the U.S. exchanges, can be seen as a positive in several respects. First of all, it suggests that local/regional markets outside of the U.S. have grown to a point where major corporations believe they can access the capital they need without relying upon U.S. investors.

Avoiding U.S. listings may also be a positive step in regards to
corporate governance. For quite a while, a U.S. listing was a mark of prestige for foreign executives. Such a listing proved that the company was large enough to matter and sound enough to meet the regulatory requirements of the U.S. exchanges – requirements that are considerably more demanding than local listing requirements decades ago. Nowadays, though, many foreign companies see U.S. listings as expensive vanity projects and some of the delisting decisions appear to have been driven by sheer pragmatism and the recognition that the benefits of U.S. market access didn't merit the costs.

Not All of This Is Good
There are some decidedly more negative lessons that can be drawn from this evolving trend. For starters, it is well worth asking whether or not the U.S. regulatory burden is making U.S. financial markets less competitive and imposing unnecessary added burdens for U.S. companies. While a company the size of IBM or Apple is going to regard regulatory compliance expenses as little more than rounding error, the costs for smaller companies can be more substantial.

Moreover, as the global

credit crisis so ably demonstrated, capital markets are increasingly global and money will flow to its cheapest destination, meaning that the U.S. could be pricing itself out of the market with regulations. It's also worth noting that many companies have replaced listings on U.S. exchanges with listings in London or the Xetra trading system. That implies that they may still see a potential need for capital access outside of their home market, but that the U.S. exchanges are no longer cost-competitive.

There is also a less desirable impact on U.S. investors from this shift. It is true that international trading is easier today than ever before; most retail investors can buy shares on the major global exchanges with online brokerages like and eTrade. These transactions are more expensive, though, and following stocks listed on foreign exchanges may be more work and inconvenience than many investors want. What's more, not every foreign exchange is available; access to markets like the
Korea Stock Exchange, Bovespa or Shanghai Stock Exchange is still fairly limited.

Less investor choice and higher transaction costs are bad things, as they lead investors to holding sub-optimal portfolios that earn less for the risk involved than would otherwise be possible. While that may not seem like such a big problem with so many thousands of stocks available on U.S. exchanges, the demand for foreign stock exchange-traded funds (ETFs) suggests that investors do want this exposure, but have to pay extra (including the ETF management fees) to get it.

The Bottom Line
The ongoing globalization of finance seems like an irresistible force. It would not be surprising if investors today live to see the day when almost every stock in the world is accessible through an electronic exchange/clearing system, with little incremental cost between trading in shares listed in New York, Singapore or London.

In the meantime, American investors may want to consider just what the ongoing trend of de-prioritizing U.S. listings says about the global market. While it is a very good thing that other financial markets are growing and maturing, the implications that U.S. regulations are too burdensome and costly to bother with is good reason to pause. Though many investors may feel that they have all the choices they need, both theory and historical practice have shown that fewer options often means worse-than-necessary performance for investors.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    6 Risks International Stocks Face in 2016

    Learn about risk factors that can influence your investment in foreign stocks and funds, and what regions are more at-risk than others.
  2. Investing

    3 Things About International Investing and Currency

    As world monetary policy continues to diverge rocking bottom on interest rates while the Fed raises them, expect currencies to continue their bumpy ride.
  3. Investing News

    Tufts Economists: TPP Will Reduce U.S. GDP

    According to economists at Tufts University, the TPP agreement will destroy half a million jobs in the U.S. by 2025.
  4. Economics

    Governments Ask Tech Giants to Join War on ISIS

    In the US and Israel, governments have asked their respective nations' tech industries to help in the war against ISIS.
  5. Forex Fundamentals

    How To Calculate An Exchange Rate

    An exchange rate is how much it costs to exchange one currency for another.
  6. Economics

    4 Ways China Influences Global Economics

    Learn the four ways China's economy can influence the global economy. The recent decline in Chinese stock markets should be the least of your worries.
  7. Economics

    Three Reasons 2016 Could Be A Better Year for the Global Economy

    The diminishing commodities market and China's slowing growth hurt a lot of companies and economies worldwide. However, there is a chance that much of the shaking out has already occurred.
  8. Fundamental Analysis

    South Korea - King of Exports

    Read about one the most important and successful exporting countries in the world, and learn more about the types of products it exports.
  9. Investing Basics

    Why You Need More International Stocks

    Most investors never stray beyond their borders. That’s a shame.
  10. Fundamental Analysis

    How Globalization Affects Developed Countries

    The increase in communications technology has companies competing in a global market.
  1. How do mutual funds work in India?

    Mutual funds in India work in much the same way as mutual funds in the United States. Like their American counterparts, Indian ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Why would a company decide to utilize H-shares over A-shares in its IPO?

    A company would decide to utilize H shares over A shares in its initial public offering (IPO) if that company believes it ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What kinds of costs are included in Free on Board (FOB) shipping?

    Free on board (FOB) shipping is a trade term published by the International Chamber of Commerce or ICC, that indicates which ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. What are the differences between B-shares and H-shares traded on Chinese stock exchanges?

    Equity listings in China generally fall under three primary categories: A shares, B shares and H shares. B shares represent ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What are the differences between H-shares and A-shares on Chinese and Hong Kong stock ...

    Publicly trade companies in China generally fall under three share categories: A shares, B shares and H-shares. A-shares ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Why are financial markets considered to be transparent?

    Financial markets are considered transparent due to the fact it is believed all relevant information is freely available ... Read Full Answer >>
Hot Definitions
  1. Flight To Quality

    The action of investors moving their capital away from riskier investments to the safest possible investment vehicles. This ...
  2. Discouraged Worker

    A person who is eligible for employment and is able to work, but is currently unemployed and has not attempted to find employment ...
  3. Ponzimonium

    After Bernard Madoff's $65 billion Ponzi scheme was revealed, many new (smaller-scale) Ponzi schemers became exposed. Ponzimonium ...
  4. Quarterly Earnings Report

    A quarterly filing made by public companies to report their performance. Included in earnings reports are items such as net ...
  5. Dark Pool Liquidity

    The trading volume created by institutional orders that are unavailable to the public. The bulk of dark pool liquidity is ...
Trading Center