Americans are sort of accustomed to having things their way. Whether it's actors, musicians, entrepreneurs or what have you, the belief (at least among Americans) has often been that you have to make it in America to really make it. So, what should investors make of the fact that many companies, including well-known names like Samsung, Nestle and Industrial and Commercial Bank Of Japan see no need to have fully-listed shares trading on U.S. exchanges?

Different Levels of Access
To be more precise, there are varying degrees of the extent to which many of these major international companies participate in the U.S. market. Many European and Asian companies (including Nestle, Daimler and Volkswagen)
do trade as American depository receipts (ADRs), and many of these companies do actively engage American investors (including press releases in English and so forth). What's more, while many companies have delisted from U.S. exchanges in recent years, most of those shares remain relatively liquid as sponsored ADRs.

There are many others, though, that are only available as a"F" shares (including Samsung, Hyundai Motors and Rosneft) and these shares are not only illiquid, but may be subject to surcharges from your broker to buy or sell shares. Moreover, information is not so readily available from these companies. Even in the case of sponsored ADR programs, there are differences and eccentricities that investors have to accept – the
companies' filling and disclosure rules are different and investors may well have fewer protections and legal options, should management act against investor interests.

This Transition Says Good Things About the World
That many overseas companies feel comfortable ignoring or delisting from the U.S. exchanges, can be seen as a positive in several respects. First of all, it suggests that local/regional markets outside of the U.S. have grown to a point where major corporations believe they can access the capital they need without relying upon U.S. investors.

Avoiding U.S. listings may also be a positive step in regards to
corporate governance. For quite a while, a U.S. listing was a mark of prestige for foreign executives. Such a listing proved that the company was large enough to matter and sound enough to meet the regulatory requirements of the U.S. exchanges – requirements that are considerably more demanding than local listing requirements decades ago. Nowadays, though, many foreign companies see U.S. listings as expensive vanity projects and some of the delisting decisions appear to have been driven by sheer pragmatism and the recognition that the benefits of U.S. market access didn't merit the costs.

Not All of This Is Good
There are some decidedly more negative lessons that can be drawn from this evolving trend. For starters, it is well worth asking whether or not the U.S. regulatory burden is making U.S. financial markets less competitive and imposing unnecessary added burdens for U.S. companies. While a company the size of IBM or Apple is going to regard regulatory compliance expenses as little more than rounding error, the costs for smaller companies can be more substantial.

Moreover, as the global

credit crisis so ably demonstrated, capital markets are increasingly global and money will flow to its cheapest destination, meaning that the U.S. could be pricing itself out of the market with regulations. It's also worth noting that many companies have replaced listings on U.S. exchanges with listings in London or the Xetra trading system. That implies that they may still see a potential need for capital access outside of their home market, but that the U.S. exchanges are no longer cost-competitive.

There is also a less desirable impact on U.S. investors from this shift. It is true that international trading is easier today than ever before; most retail investors can buy shares on the major global exchanges with online brokerages like and eTrade. These transactions are more expensive, though, and following stocks listed on foreign exchanges may be more work and inconvenience than many investors want. What's more, not every foreign exchange is available; access to markets like the
Korea Stock Exchange, Bovespa or Shanghai Stock Exchange is still fairly limited.

Less investor choice and higher transaction costs are bad things, as they lead investors to holding sub-optimal portfolios that earn less for the risk involved than would otherwise be possible. While that may not seem like such a big problem with so many thousands of stocks available on U.S. exchanges, the demand for foreign stock exchange-traded funds (ETFs) suggests that investors do want this exposure, but have to pay extra (including the ETF management fees) to get it.

The Bottom Line
The ongoing globalization of finance seems like an irresistible force. It would not be surprising if investors today live to see the day when almost every stock in the world is accessible through an electronic exchange/clearing system, with little incremental cost between trading in shares listed in New York, Singapore or London.

In the meantime, American investors may want to consider just what the ongoing trend of de-prioritizing U.S. listings says about the global market. While it is a very good thing that other financial markets are growing and maturing, the implications that U.S. regulations are too burdensome and costly to bother with is good reason to pause. Though many investors may feel that they have all the choices they need, both theory and historical practice have shown that fewer options often means worse-than-necessary performance for investors.

Related Articles
  1. Economics

    Long-Term Investing Impact of the Paris Attacks

    We share some insights on how the recent terrorist attacks in Paris could impact the economy and markets going forward.
  2. Trading Strategies

    How to Trade In a Flat Market

    Reduce position size by 50% to 75% in a flat market.
  3. Markets

    Will Paris Attacks Undo the European Union Dream?

    Last Friday's attacks in Paris are transforming the migrant crisis into an EU security threat, which could undermine the European Union dream.
  4. Markets

    What Slow Global Growth Means for Portfolios

    While U.S. growth remains relatively resilient, global growth continues to slip.
  5. Investing Basics

    General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)

    The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade was a treaty created after World War II that regulated world trade in an effort to aide economic recovery.
  6. Economics

    What is Dumping?

    Dumping refers to exporting a good at a lower price than the price charged for the good at home.
  7. Wealth Management

    How To Open And Access An Offshore Bank Account

    Opening an offshore bank account does not require a high level of financial sophistication. It’s a lot like opening an account at your neighborhood bank.
  8. Investing

    2 Investing Implications of Higher US Rates

    While U.S. economic data continue to come in mixed, the numbers still point to decent U.S. economic growth.
  9. Economics

    How Healthy Are Turkish Banks?

    Turkish banks remain vulnerable to the Federal Reserve’s expected rate hike that could curb capital flows to emerging markets.
  10. Trading Strategies

    Finding Momentum Plays in Flat Markets

    Momentum traders should reduce frequency and size in flat markets, while seeking out story stocks that continue to trend higher or lower.
  1. How do mutual funds work in India?

    Mutual funds in India work in much the same way as mutual funds in the United States. Like their American counterparts, Indian ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Why would a company decide to utilize H-shares over A-shares in its IPO?

    A company would decide to utilize H shares over A shares in its initial public offering (IPO) if that company believes it ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What kinds of costs are included in Free on Board (FOB) shipping?

    Free on board (FOB) shipping is a trade term published by the International Chamber of Commerce or ICC, that indicates which ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. What are the differences between B-shares and H-shares traded on Chinese stock exchanges?

    Equity listings in China generally fall under three primary categories: A shares, B shares and H shares. B shares represent ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What are the differences between H-shares and A-shares on Chinese and Hong Kong stock ...

    Publicly trade companies in China generally fall under three share categories: A shares, B shares and H-shares. A-shares ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Why are financial markets considered to be transparent?

    Financial markets are considered transparent due to the fact it is believed all relevant information is freely available ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Hot Definitions
  1. Take A Bath

    A slang term referring to the situation of an investor who has experienced a large loss from an investment or speculative ...
  2. Black Friday

    1. A day of stock market catastrophe. Originally, September 24, 1869, was deemed Black Friday. The crash was sparked by gold ...
  3. Turkey

    Slang for an investment that yields disappointing results or turns out worse than expected. Failed business deals, securities ...
  4. Barefoot Pilgrim

    A slang term for an unsophisticated investor who loses all of his or her wealth by trading equities in the stock market. ...
  5. Quick Ratio

    The quick ratio is an indicator of a company’s short-term liquidity. The quick ratio measures a company’s ability to meet ...
  6. Black Tuesday

    October 29, 1929, when the DJIA fell 12% - one of the largest one-day drops in stock market history. More than 16 million ...
Trading Center