Americans are sort of accustomed to having things their way. Whether it's actors, musicians, entrepreneurs or what have you, the belief (at least among Americans) has often been that you have to make it in America to really make it. So, what should investors make of the fact that many companies, including well-known names like Samsung, Nestle and Industrial and Commercial Bank Of Japan see no need to have fully-listed shares trading on U.S. exchanges?

Different Levels of Access
To be more precise, there are varying degrees of the extent to which many of these major international companies participate in the U.S. market. Many European and Asian companies (including Nestle, Daimler and Volkswagen)
do trade as American depository receipts (ADRs), and many of these companies do actively engage American investors (including press releases in English and so forth). What's more, while many companies have delisted from U.S. exchanges in recent years, most of those shares remain relatively liquid as sponsored ADRs.

There are many others, though, that are only available as a"F" shares (including Samsung, Hyundai Motors and Rosneft) and these shares are not only illiquid, but may be subject to surcharges from your broker to buy or sell shares. Moreover, information is not so readily available from these companies. Even in the case of sponsored ADR programs, there are differences and eccentricities that investors have to accept – the
companies' filling and disclosure rules are different and investors may well have fewer protections and legal options, should management act against investor interests.

This Transition Says Good Things About the World
That many overseas companies feel comfortable ignoring or delisting from the U.S. exchanges, can be seen as a positive in several respects. First of all, it suggests that local/regional markets outside of the U.S. have grown to a point where major corporations believe they can access the capital they need without relying upon U.S. investors.

Avoiding U.S. listings may also be a positive step in regards to
corporate governance. For quite a while, a U.S. listing was a mark of prestige for foreign executives. Such a listing proved that the company was large enough to matter and sound enough to meet the regulatory requirements of the U.S. exchanges – requirements that are considerably more demanding than local listing requirements decades ago. Nowadays, though, many foreign companies see U.S. listings as expensive vanity projects and some of the delisting decisions appear to have been driven by sheer pragmatism and the recognition that the benefits of U.S. market access didn't merit the costs.

Not All of This Is Good
There are some decidedly more negative lessons that can be drawn from this evolving trend. For starters, it is well worth asking whether or not the U.S. regulatory burden is making U.S. financial markets less competitive and imposing unnecessary added burdens for U.S. companies. While a company the size of IBM or Apple is going to regard regulatory compliance expenses as little more than rounding error, the costs for smaller companies can be more substantial.

Moreover, as the global

credit crisis so ably demonstrated, capital markets are increasingly global and money will flow to its cheapest destination, meaning that the U.S. could be pricing itself out of the market with regulations. It's also worth noting that many companies have replaced listings on U.S. exchanges with listings in London or the Xetra trading system. That implies that they may still see a potential need for capital access outside of their home market, but that the U.S. exchanges are no longer cost-competitive.

There is also a less desirable impact on U.S. investors from this shift. It is true that international trading is easier today than ever before; most retail investors can buy shares on the major global exchanges with online brokerages like and eTrade. These transactions are more expensive, though, and following stocks listed on foreign exchanges may be more work and inconvenience than many investors want. What's more, not every foreign exchange is available; access to markets like the
Korea Stock Exchange, Bovespa or Shanghai Stock Exchange is still fairly limited.

Less investor choice and higher transaction costs are bad things, as they lead investors to holding sub-optimal portfolios that earn less for the risk involved than would otherwise be possible. While that may not seem like such a big problem with so many thousands of stocks available on U.S. exchanges, the demand for foreign stock exchange-traded funds (ETFs) suggests that investors do want this exposure, but have to pay extra (including the ETF management fees) to get it.

The Bottom Line
The ongoing globalization of finance seems like an irresistible force. It would not be surprising if investors today live to see the day when almost every stock in the world is accessible through an electronic exchange/clearing system, with little incremental cost between trading in shares listed in New York, Singapore or London.

In the meantime, American investors may want to consider just what the ongoing trend of de-prioritizing U.S. listings says about the global market. While it is a very good thing that other financial markets are growing and maturing, the implications that U.S. regulations are too burdensome and costly to bother with is good reason to pause. Though many investors may feel that they have all the choices they need, both theory and historical practice have shown that fewer options often means worse-than-necessary performance for investors.

Related Articles
  1. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: iShares MSCI Hong Kong

    Learn about the iShares MSCI Hong Kong fund, which invests in various equities of companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
  2. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Top 3 Switzerland ETFs

    Explore detailed analysis and information of the top three Swiss exchange-traded funds that offer exposure to the Swiss equities market.
  3. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: SPDR Dow Jones International RelEst

    Learn how the SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate exchange-traded fund (ETF) is managed and for whom the ETF is most appropriate.
  4. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: iShares JPMorgan USD Emerg Markets Bond

    Learn about the iShares JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Bond fund, which invests in bonds of sovereign and quasi-sovereign entities from emerging markets.
  5. Investing Basics

    Explaining Trade Liberalization

    Trade liberalization is the process of removing or reducing obstacles that impede the exchange of goods and services between nations.
  6. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: iShares MSCI Europe Financials

    Learn about the iShares MSCI Europe Financials fund, which invests in numerous European financial industries, such as banks, insurance and real estate.
  7. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap

    Learn about the SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap exchange-traded fund, which invests in small-cap firms traded at the emerging equity markets.
  8. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: iShares MSCI Turkey

    Learn about the iShares MSCI Turkey exchange-traded fund, which invests in a wide variety of companies' equities traded on Turkish exchanges.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: Vanguard Total World Stock

    Learn about the Vanguard Total World Stock exchange-traded fund, which invests in stocks located in numerous countries with a high level of diversification.
  10. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: iShares MSCI South Africa

    Learn more about the iShares MSCI South Africa fund, which is an NYSE-listed exchange-traded fund offered and managed by BlackRock.
  1. Trade Credit

    An agreement where a customer can purchase goods on account (without ...
  2. Brazil, Russia, India And China ...

    An acronym for the economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China ...
  3. Optimal Currency Area

    The geographic area in which a single currency would create the ...
  4. European Sovereign Debt Crisis

    A period of time in which several European countries faced the ...
  5. Foreign remittance

  6. Heckscher-Ohlin Model

    An economic theory that states that countries export what they ...
  1. Why would a company decide to utilize H-shares over A-shares in its IPO?

    A company would decide to utilize H shares over A shares in its initial public offering (IPO) if that company believes it ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What kinds of costs are included in Free on Board (FOB) shipping?

    Free on board (FOB) shipping is a trade term published by the International Chamber of Commerce or ICC, that indicates which ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What are the differences between B-shares and H-shares traded on Chinese stock exchanges?

    Equity listings in China generally fall under three primary categories: A shares, B shares and H shares. B shares represent ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. What are the differences between H-shares and A-shares on Chinese and Hong Kong stock ...

    Publicly trade companies in China generally fall under three share categories: A shares, B shares and H-shares. A-shares ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Why are financial markets considered to be transparent?

    Financial markets are considered transparent due to the fact it is believed all relevant information is freely available ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. How does a Foreign Institutional Investor (FII) manage currency risk when investing ...

    A foreign institutional investor (FII) manages currency risks (inflation and exchange rate risk) by using traditional tools ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center

You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!