You might remember the Troubled Asset Relief Program, well known as TARP, but in case the terrifying days of the 2008 and 2009 Great Recession are no longer fresh in your mind, let's take a look back. In 2008, we had all been introduced to financial terms that were once foreign to us. The average consumer knew nothing of subprime mortgages, mortgage backed securities or toxic assets, and they didn't realize that the housing market had ballooned to valuations unsustainable.

SEE: The Impact Of Recession On Businesses

2008 and Beyond
Each day we were hearing about another large bank that was drowning in its toxic assets. These were often assets that were mortgage backed and were losing a substantial amount of value at an unprecedented rate. Virtually overnight, huge banks that made up a large part of the American financial system were at risk of declaring bankruptcy - something that could turn already catastrophic events into something worse. Many feared a depression equal or worse than the Great Depression of 1929 could be triggered.

In October 2008, as part of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the Troubled Asset Relief Program was born, and $700 billion was pledged to buy toxic assets from the troubled banks in order to shore up their balance sheets and give them a chance to weather the storm and recover.

Proponents of TARP believed that letting these institutions fail could cause a complete financial collapse. Opponents of TARP believed that no institution should be too big to fail and there were millions of small businesses, and countless citizens, who could use a bailout as well. It was argued that throwing away $700 billion was an irresponsible use of taxpayer money.

In the end, $432 billion of the original allotted $700 billion was lent. The big question is, was the money lost, as many believed would be the fate of TARP? Although taxpayers will likely not recoup all of the funds, it appears that the program will be far more cost effective than originally thought.

SEE: How Much Has The Taxpayer Recouped From Tarp?

Goldman Sachs
Prior to 2008, Goldman Sachs was hardly a household name, but on Wall Street this investment bank is arguably the most powerful non-government bank in the world. Nobody thought that a bank of this size could be brought down, almost overnight. It happened, however, and along with an investment by Warren Buffett, Goldman Sachs received $10 billion in TARP funds. Using funds raised from a $5 billion stock offering, Goldman Sachs paid back TARP funds less than one year later, but in the end, tax payers made $1.4 billion.

Morgan Stanley
Although competitors, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs have a nearly identical history. Each found themselves holding such a large amount of toxic assets that their survival was in question. The government had to do something to restore confidence in the financial system and hopefully thaw out credit markets. Using the TARP program, the government lent Morgan Stanley $10 billion. Those funds were later paid back, netting tax payers $1.3 billion in profits.

American Express
Popular credit card company American Express applied for $3.9 billion in government bailout funds, making it the ninth largest investment for the TARP program. An American Express spokesman said, "Treasury's investment will help bolster our capital position in an uncertain economic environment," but the company later paid back the taxpayer's investment and, like other TARP institutions, paid dividends and issued preferred shares. This helped to produce a profit of $414 million.

Small Banks
It wasn't only the "too big to fail" banks that received TARP funds. Numerous smaller banks were authorized to receive TARP funds under similar terms as the large banks. Many of these small banks have repaid TARP funds, netting the treasury a profit of $35 million.

The Bottom Line
New estimates show that the TARP program may show a profit of $23.6 billion over the life of the bailout program, but some lawmakers believe that claiming victory is premature, since there are still outstanding loans. Others say that if the government does end up in the black, the profit could have been much larger if more aggressive deals were reached with the financial institutions receiving funds.

Still, if the government ends up recouping all of the funds, it will be difficult to argue that TARP was hardly the financial disaster that some politicians believed it would be.

Related Articles
  1. Economics

    How Bernie Sanders Has Avoided Big Money (Mostly)

    Bernie Sanders hasn't entirely avoided PACs with his fundraising, but he has gotten a lot of bang for the buck
  2. Investing News

    Obama Wants to Double Wall Street Regulation

    President Obama wants to double the budgets of the SEC and the CFTC over the next five years.
  3. Economics

    Does Big Money Hurt or Help Clinton and Rubio?

    Marco Rubio and Hillary Clinton lead their parties in raising money from Wall Street. Is that a help or a hindrance?
  4. Economics

    The 2007-08 Financial Crisis In Review

    Subprime lenders began filing for bankruptcy in 2007 -- more than 25 during February and March, alone.
  5. Fundamental Analysis

    The Evolution of Obamacare Since Its Inception

    Find out whether the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, has lived up to its lofty projections from 2010.
  6. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  7. Economics

    Lehman Brothers: The Largest Bankruptcy Filing Ever

    Lehman Brothers survived several crises, but the collapse of the U.S. housing market brought the company to its knees.
  8. Economics

    Why Enron Collapsed

    Enron’s collapse is a classic example of greed gone wrong.
  9. Stock Analysis

    China Mobile: Just How Big is It? (CHL, CHU, CHA)

    The story behind China Mobile, the biggest company you might never have heard of.
  10. Markets

    The (Expected) Market Impact of the 2016 Election

    With primary season upon us, investor attention is beginning to turn to the upcoming U.S. presidential election.
  1. What are the major laws (acts) regulating financial institutions that were created ...

    Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, in conjunction with Congress, signed into law several major legislative responses ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Which mutual funds made money in 2008?

    Out of the 2,800 mutual funds that Morningstar, Inc., the leading provider of independent investment research in North America, ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Does working capital include stock?

    A certain portion of a company’s working capital is generally composed of earnings; however, current short-term assets that ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. What is the Social Security administration responsible for?

    The main responsibility of the U.S. Social Security Administration, or SSA, is overseeing the country's Social Security program. ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Where are the Social Security administration headquarters?

    The U.S. Social Security Administration, or SSA, is headquartered in Woodlawn, Maryland, a suburb just outside of Baltimore. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Is the Social Security administration a government corporation?

    The U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) is a government agency, not a government corporation. President Franklin Roosevelt ... Read Full Answer >>
Hot Definitions
  1. Socially Responsible Investment - SRI

    An investment that is considered socially responsible because of the nature of the business the company conducts. Common ...
  2. Inverted Yield Curve

    An interest rate environment in which long-term debt instruments have a lower yield than short-term debt instruments of the ...
  3. Presidential Election Cycle (Theory)

    A theory developed by Yale Hirsch that states that U.S. stock markets are weakest in the year following the election of a ...
  4. Super Bowl Indicator

    An indicator based on the belief that a Super Bowl win for a team from the old AFL (AFC division) foretells a decline in ...
  5. Flight To Quality

    The action of investors moving their capital away from riskier investments to the safest possible investment vehicles. This ...
  6. Discouraged Worker

    A person who is eligible for employment and is able to work, but is currently unemployed and has not attempted to find employment ...
Trading Center