You might remember the Troubled Asset Relief Program, well known as TARP, but in case the terrifying days of the 2008 and 2009 Great Recession are no longer fresh in your mind, let's take a look back. In 2008, we had all been introduced to financial terms that were once foreign to us. The average consumer knew nothing of subprime mortgages, mortgage backed securities or toxic assets, and they didn't realize that the housing market had ballooned to valuations unsustainable.

SEE: The Impact Of Recession On Businesses

2008 and Beyond
Each day we were hearing about another large bank that was drowning in its toxic assets. These were often assets that were mortgage backed and were losing a substantial amount of value at an unprecedented rate. Virtually overnight, huge banks that made up a large part of the American financial system were at risk of declaring bankruptcy - something that could turn already catastrophic events into something worse. Many feared a depression equal or worse than the Great Depression of 1929 could be triggered.

In October 2008, as part of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the Troubled Asset Relief Program was born, and $700 billion was pledged to buy toxic assets from the troubled banks in order to shore up their balance sheets and give them a chance to weather the storm and recover.

Proponents of TARP believed that letting these institutions fail could cause a complete financial collapse. Opponents of TARP believed that no institution should be too big to fail and there were millions of small businesses, and countless citizens, who could use a bailout as well. It was argued that throwing away $700 billion was an irresponsible use of taxpayer money.

In the end, $432 billion of the original allotted $700 billion was lent. The big question is, was the money lost, as many believed would be the fate of TARP? Although taxpayers will likely not recoup all of the funds, it appears that the program will be far more cost effective than originally thought.

SEE: How Much Has The Taxpayer Recouped From Tarp?

Goldman Sachs
Prior to 2008, Goldman Sachs was hardly a household name, but on Wall Street this investment bank is arguably the most powerful non-government bank in the world. Nobody thought that a bank of this size could be brought down, almost overnight. It happened, however, and along with an investment by Warren Buffett, Goldman Sachs received $10 billion in TARP funds. Using funds raised from a $5 billion stock offering, Goldman Sachs paid back TARP funds less than one year later, but in the end, tax payers made $1.4 billion.

Morgan Stanley
Although competitors, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs have a nearly identical history. Each found themselves holding such a large amount of toxic assets that their survival was in question. The government had to do something to restore confidence in the financial system and hopefully thaw out credit markets. Using the TARP program, the government lent Morgan Stanley $10 billion. Those funds were later paid back, netting tax payers $1.3 billion in profits.

American Express
Popular credit card company American Express applied for $3.9 billion in government bailout funds, making it the ninth largest investment for the TARP program. An American Express spokesman said, "Treasury's investment will help bolster our capital position in an uncertain economic environment," but the company later paid back the taxpayer's investment and, like other TARP institutions, paid dividends and issued preferred shares. This helped to produce a profit of $414 million.

Small Banks
It wasn't only the "too big to fail" banks that received TARP funds. Numerous smaller banks were authorized to receive TARP funds under similar terms as the large banks. Many of these small banks have repaid TARP funds, netting the treasury a profit of $35 million.

The Bottom Line
New estimates show that the TARP program may show a profit of $23.6 billion over the life of the bailout program, but some lawmakers believe that claiming victory is premature, since there are still outstanding loans. Others say that if the government does end up in the black, the profit could have been much larger if more aggressive deals were reached with the financial institutions receiving funds.

Still, if the government ends up recouping all of the funds, it will be difficult to argue that TARP was hardly the financial disaster that some politicians believed it would be.

Related Articles
  1. Economics

    Will North and South Korea Ever Reunite?

    North and South Korea have been divided for over six decades. Some analysts think the two countries could reunify within the next 10 years.
  2. Economics

    The Top 9 Things to Know About Hillary Clinton's Economic View

    Find out where former secretary of state and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton stands on the economy, jobs, trade and education.
  3. Economics

    Is Argentina a Socialist Country?

    Find out why it does not really make sense to call Argentina a socialist country, even though the South American nation has many socialistic tendencies.
  4. Professionals

    Holding Out for Capital Gains Could Be a Mistake

    Holding stocks for the sole purpose of avoiding short-term capital gains taxes may be a mistake, especially if all the signs say get out.
  5. Term

    What is the Macro Environment?

    The macro environment is the conditions existing in an economy as a whole, rather than in a single sector or region.
  6. Economics

    How Does National Income Accounting Work?

    National income accounting is an economic term describing the system used by a country to gather data and determine aggregate economic activity.
  7. Economics

    What is a Free Rider Problem?

    In economics, the free rider problem refers to someone being able to get, for less or even for free, what others pay more for.
  8. Stock Analysis

    How GM Keeps on Truckin'

    Following a giant bailout and a giant IPO, the new GM is carried by sales of its giant trucks. But is it profitable?
  9. Investing News

    Will Arch Coal file for Bankruptcy?

    In the last four years, Arch Coal Inc. (ACI) has been facing headwinds from lower price of coal amid global oversupply. The shares of ACI have lost nearly 99% of their value this year.
  10. Economics

    2 Countries That Are Friends With North Korea

    Learn about the few international allies of North Korea and the reasons the country is largely politically isolated from the rest of the world.
RELATED TERMS
  1. Section 1231 Property

    A tax term relating to depreciable business property that has ...
  2. Emergency Banking Act Of 1933

    A bill passed during the administration of former U.S. President ...
  3. Gross Domestic Product - GDP

    The monetary value of all the finished goods and services produced ...
  4. Regional Asset Liquidation Agreement ...

    An agreement between an asset manager and the Federal Deposit ...
  5. The New Deal

    A series of domestic programs designed to help the United States ...
  6. Accelerated Resolution Program ...

    A program designed to reduce the time and cost of resolving failed ...
RELATED FAQS
  1. What are the major laws (acts) regulating financial institutions that were created ...

    Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, in conjunction with Congress, signed into law several major legislative responses ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Where are the Social Security administration headquarters?

    The U.S. Social Security Administration, or SSA, is headquartered in Woodlawn, Maryland, a suburb just outside of Baltimore. ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What is the Social Security administration responsible for?

    The main responsibility of the U.S. Social Security Administration, or SSA, is overseeing the country's Social Security program. ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Is the Social Security administration a government corporation?

    The U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) is a government agency, not a government corporation. President Franklin Roosevelt ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. How does the role of Medicare/Medicaid affect the drugs sector in the U.S.?

    Medicare and Medicaid have enormous influence on the pharmaceutical, or drugs, sector in the United States. For instance, ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What are the ethical arguments against government subsidies to companies like Tesla?

    The ethical argument behind government subsidies is that they should be put into place to help industries that will, in turn, ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
×

You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!