Have you ever wondered if the government has a plan to avoid another financial institution failure, or if there's a bigger (or smaller), better bailout plan in the works? As luck would have it, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has a new and innovative plan to handle the next financial institution failure and possible bank bailout.

SEE: The History Of The FDIC

Learning from Previous Bailouts
The main problems with recent bailout attempts included: taxpayer-funded bailouts, bankruptcy and insolvency, mergers, acquisitions and takeovers. Previously, American taxpayers funded the AIG bailout and the United States government emerged as a majority shareholder in the new AIG. With the AIG plan, it remained difficult to return ownership to private hands through orderly market operations.

When Lehman Brothers entered bankruptcy, there was widespread disruption and destabilization throughout the U.S. and international financial markets. After Bank of America acquired Merrill Lynch, federal regulators then realized that even when existing financial institutions have sufficient capital and adequate management expertise to take over failing companies quickly, they tend to create even larger, more complex financial institutions, which may not be the most desirable situation.

SEE: The Collapse Of Lehman Brothers

What Might Work for Future Financial Institution Failures?
According to remarks by Martin Gruenberg, Acting Chairman of the FDIC, there is a creditor-supported, FDIC-guided plan to restructure, recapitalize and reprivatize the next systemically important financial institution to go by the wayside. Previously, the FDIC had limited powers and could only deal with insured deposit institutions.

The Dodd-Frank Act gives the FDIC the power to place non-bank parent holding companies into receivership. Once in receivership, the FDIC would create a new bridge company, and then would finally guide the newly capitalized company back into private ownership. The FDIC will appoint a board of directors and CEO to manage and operate the bridge company while restructuring takes place.

SEE: Dodd-Frank's Consequences

The Key Is in Shareholder and Creditor Treatment
The difference in the new plan is how shareholders and creditors are treated. The FDIC resolution plan eliminates current equity positions in the failed company. Under the FDIC plan, subordinated and senior unsecured debt of the failed company become equity positions and some of the remaining debtors receive convertible subordinated debt claims in the newly created company. In effect, the FDIC decides, in advance, who the new owners and creditors will be. The new owners, i.e., former creditors, will then elect a new board of directors, who will in turn appoint a new CEO.

The newly created company is fully capitalized through debt-to-equity conversions and has established credit-worthiness and relationships through unsecured debt-to-convertible subordinated debt conversions. Additionally, and perhaps most importantly, is that the newly created company will emerge directly from receivership as a private, non-government owned entity.

Other Features of the FDIC Plan

  • Limited taxpayer losses: The Dodd-Frank Act allows the government to provide limited debt guarantees to a newly created company, instead of the traditional, taxpayer-funded cash infusion from the Treasury.
  • Government repayment provision: The Dodd-Frank Act also established the Orderly Liquidation Fund (OLF). Under the OLF, the Treasury Department may provide temporary liquidity to a company during the restructuring period, but the funds must be repaid through asset recovery from failed firms, or from assessments levied on larger financial institutions.
  • The "living will" requirement: Financial institutions with assets of $50 billion and up must have a resolution plan in place. The plan tells the FDIC how the company should be managed in the event of a failure. Plans for companies with assets exceeding $250 billion are expected as early as July 2012.
  • No deposit insurance: This may be the only downside of the plan. If the failing company is not an FDIC-insured bank, the FDIC will only operate as the resolution authority and will not extend deposit insurance to the parent holding company or any subsidiaries.

How Effective Will the FDIC Resolution Plan Be?
The plan will take only the parent holding company into receivership, leaving any subsidiaries free to continue important operations in both the U.S. and international financial markets. Subsidiaries can operate with the confidence that the new parent holding company will already be privately owned and capitalized, and not subject to share price volatility as the government tries to sell its equity shares on the stock market.

The Bottom Line
The goals of the FDIC resolution plan are financial stability, accountability and viability for financial institutions that play a vital role in the overall health of the economy, and to the banking and financial systems. First, the plan facilitates financial stability by eliminating systemic risks that subsidiaries face when holding companies face liquidity problems. Second, the plan facilitates accountability because investors - both equity and debt holders - bear the losses of failed firms.

Accountability is further enhanced because taxpayers are essentially reimbursed through the asset recovery provision. Finally, the FDIC plan facilitates market viability because there is private market participation throughout the receivership process. If the FDIC resolution plan proves to be effective, then the government will avoid the next bailout through the use of a publicly guided, private-sector funded and managed workout agreement.

Related Articles
  1. Forex Education

    China's Devaluation of the Yuan

    Just over one week ago the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) surprised markets with three consecutive devaluations of the yuan, knocking over 3% off its value.
  2. Professionals

    Holding Out for Capital Gains Could Be a Mistake

    Holding stocks for the sole purpose of avoiding short-term capital gains taxes may be a mistake, especially if all the signs say get out.
  3. Investing News

    Will Arch Coal file for Bankruptcy?

    In the last four years, Arch Coal Inc. (ACI) has been facing headwinds from lower price of coal amid global oversupply. The shares of ACI have lost nearly 99% of their value this year.
  4. Economics

    Is The EU Holding Germany Back?

    As Germany agrees to initiate bailout talks with Greece once again, could all of the EU's economic turmoil result in Germany being better off alone?
  5. Investing Basics

    3 Companies You Never Thought Would Go Bankrupt

    Understand more about company bankruptcy and why a company would file for bankruptcy. Learn about three companies that went from industry leaders to bankruptcy.
  6. Economics

    The Biggest Items Obama Is Still Missing From His Mandate

    Learn how the biggest items missing from Obama's mandate include various forms of tax reform and closing the Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba.
  7. Economics

    A Comparison Between a Default and a Collapse

    Is the Greek default similar to the Lehman Brothers collapse?
  8. Investing Basics

    These Four Industries Must Change to Survive

    Tech innovations from new companies are threatening long-time industry stalwarts in transportation, hospitality and finance.
  9. Investing Basics

    Who Is The Next Greece?

    Several EU countries are on the potential candidate list, but some municipalities in the U.S. look far more like Greece. Could they be the “next Greece”?
  10. Bonds & Fixed Income

    Dodd-Frank Creates a Liquidity Crunch for Bonds

    While each individual institution is undoubtedly safer due to capital constraints imposed by Dodd-Frank, this makes for a more illiquid market overall. The lack of liquidity will be especially ...
  1. Emergency Banking Act Of 1933

    A bill passed during the administration of former U.S. President ...
  2. Regional Asset Liquidation Agreement ...

    An agreement between an asset manager and the Federal Deposit ...
  3. The New Deal

    A series of domestic programs designed to help the United States ...
  4. D’Oench Duhme Doctrine

    A banking rule which states that a borrower or guarantor cannot ...
  5. Accelerated Resolution Program ...

    A program designed to reduce the time and cost of resolving failed ...
  6. Altman Z-Score

    The output of a credit-strength test that gauges a publicly traded ...
  1. Do negative externalities affect financial markets?

    In economics, a negative externality happens when a decision maker does not pay all the costs for his actions. Economists ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between disposable and discretionary income?

    According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, or BEA, disposable income is the amount of money an individual takes home after ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What are some of the major regulatory agencies responsible for overseeing financial ...

    There are a number of agencies assigned to regulate and oversee financial institutions and financial markets, including the ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. What are the major laws (acts) regulating financial institutions that were created ...

    Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, in conjunction with Congress, signed into law several major legislative responses ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What are the similarities and differences between the savings and loan (S&L) crisis ...

    The savings and loan crisis and the subprime mortgage crisis both began with banks creating new profit centers following ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What measures could the U.S. Government take to prevent another crisis similar to ...

    Some of the measures that the U.S. government can take to prevent another crisis similar to the savings and loan (S&L) ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center

You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!