The Obama Administration is seeking to give investors a vote in how Wall Street titans compensate themselves. A party-line vote in the House of Representatives sent the Corporate And Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act to the Senate, where it has yet to be voted on.

What Is It?
The "say on pay" bill, as it has come to be nicknamed, is part of a larger effort to shed some light on Wall Street's compensations practice after big banks took billions of dollars in taxpayer money to bail themselves out of the financial mess they created only to turnaround and award themselves obscene bonuses.

In the aftermath of the public outrage over big wigs flying around in private jets while begging for public money, nine big banks raked in $175 billion in bailout cash as a reward for losing investor's money, wrecking the financial system and jeopardizing the health of the economy. Those same banks then doled out $32.6 billion in bonuses to many of the very people responsible for the meltdown.

The Obama Administration responded with an initiative to give shareholders annual non-binding votes over the bonuses given to senior executives. A similar vote would apply to the golden parachute bonuses executives are paid when their firms are sold.

Although non-binding, the effort would put the numbers in the spotlight and give investors insight into how their money is being spent. It seems only fair. After all, the investors do own the companies and the executives are supposed to work on behalf of their owners. (Shareholders are getting a bigger say in how companies are run. Find out how you can be heard, read How Your Vote Can Change Corporate Policy.)

Government Intervention - Is It The Right Choice?
Republicans are crying foul, arguing that the government shouldn't be involved in setting wages or telling companies how to run their businesses.

For many taxpayers, it's a hollow argument. The executives have not only demonstrated their disregard for shareholders, they've also demonstrated their willingness to jeopardize the nation's economic health and lay off workers, all the while reaching deeply into taxpayers pockets to enrich themselves.

Another portion of the bill seeks to ban "unfair pay practices" for brokers and advisors, prohibiting compensative plans that reward lenders or traders for taking risks that threaten the financial system. This portion of the bill is déjà vu all over again, as the same type of thing was done in 2002 with Sarbanes-Oxley, which failed to make a difference.

Recall that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, also known as the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002, was put in place after analysts at Wall Street firms gave rave reviews to bad stocks. Their ratings put lipstick on pigs, enabling brokers to sell shares of Tyco, Enron, WorldCom and other similar firms to unsuspecting investors. (Where there is money, there are swindlers. Protect yourself by learning how investors have been betrayed in the past. Check out The Biggest Stock Scams Of All Time.)

Less than ten years later, we have another Wall Street scandal and another new plan to curb criminal behavior, or at least make the criminals work a little harder. While the say on pay initiative is by no means a sure fire success, and like Sarbanes-Oxley future generations will likely debate its effectiveness, it looks to be a step in the right direction.

The Bottom Line
The financial services industry has done well by itself, creating loads of wealth for industry kingpins at the expense of mom and pop investors.

In bull markets and bear markets the one constant is that the guy who sold the investment gets paid. Sometimes he gets paid a little more to sell the products his firm created or was hired to promote. Sometimes he chooses products that pay better than others, even if the others would deliver better performance for his clients. Sometimes he just outright lies, cheats and steals to make a buck.

Given corporate America's propensity to victimize investors and the limited number of other venues investors have in which to put their kids through college and fund their retirements, it seems like the little guy needs all the help he can get.

Related Articles
  1. Fundamental Analysis

    The Basics Of Corporate Structure

    CEOs, CFOs, presidents and vice presidents: learn how to tell the difference.
  2. Options & Futures

    Pick 401(k) Assets Like A Pro

    Professionals choose the options available to you in your plan, making your decisions easier.
  3. Fundamental Analysis

    Top Reasons IPO Valuations Miss The Mark

    The costly services of investment banks don’t necessarily guarantee accuracy in IPO pricing.
  4. Insurance

    All About Impaired Risk Annuites and Insurance

    What are impaired risk insurance products and understanding life insurance rate classes, table ratings and flat extra premiums.
  5. Investing Basics

    What Does a Transfer Agent Do?

    Transfer agents maintain the records and documents related to shareholder accounts.
  6. Taxes

    6 Reasons to Donate Your Car to Charity

    It's no longer a free ride, but there are still tax benefits to doing so.
  7. Economics

    What Does Vesting Mean?

    Vesting is the process of accruing non-forfeitable rights.
  8. Economics

    What's a Conglomerate?

    A conglomerate is a corporation that’s comprised of several different independent businesses.
  9. Investing Basics

    Breaking Down Optimal Capital Structure

    An optimal capital structure shows the best balance of debt to equity a company can have in order to minimize its cost of capital.
  10. Economics

    Explaining Interest

    Interest is the price charged to borrow money, and is typically expressed as a percentage of the principal, or the amount loaned.
  1. How do modern companies assess business risk?

    Before a business can assess or mitigate business risk, it must first identify probable or likely risks to its bottom line. ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Why has emphasis on corporate governance grown in the 21st century?

    Corporate governance refers to operational practices, management protocols, and other governing rules or principles by which ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How did Enron use off-balance-sheet items to hide huge debts and toxic assets?

    Prior to its infamous accounting scandals and collapse, Enron used off-balance-sheet special purpose vehicles (SPVs) to hide ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How can I buy shares in the primary market?

    If you want to buy shares in the primary market, you need to either be part of a syndicate or one of the lucky few whose ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What impact did the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have on corporate governance in the United ...

    After a prolonged period of corporate scandals involving large public companies from 2000 to 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. In what ways does government regulation impact the insurance sector?

    Regulation is not consistent among all forms of insurance. The kinds of regulations imposed on AIG for guaranteeing credit ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!