Whether it's due to the rise of social media and the phenomenon of the immediate sharing of views and opinions or just an intensification of the "culture wars" that seem to occur everywhere throughout history, where we eat and shop now has more political and social overtones than ever before. In particular, companies are finding that they must be very careful in how they attempt to position themselves towards Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered (LGBT) customers.

Targeted Marketing Has a Long Tradition
While explicitly looking to appeal to LGBT customers may aggravate or antagonize some people, the reality is that it's a natural outgrowth of what companies have been doing with their marketing for decades. Mass marketing is fine, but companies have long known that they can increase their sales by also running ads that appeal to specific groups.

While I may be trafficking in stereotypes here, a company is not going to attract female shoppers in the 34 to 50 age group with commercials featuring a lot of explosions and crass jokes, just like ads with middle-aged women sitting on a couch and having a quiet chat aren't going to sell a product to teenaged boys.

In the case of the LGBT community, you're talking about a market estimated to include about 9 million people, with nearly $800 billion in annual buying power. That's a market worth trying to court, to say nothing of the fact that taking the opposite approach (looking to exclude or offend this group) may not only alienate this market, but also have a spillover effect to those who consider themselves "friends and family." Likewise, a company's employment and benefits policies can often act as a positive marketing factor - companies such as Levi's, Nike (NYSE:NKE) and Starbucks (Nasdaq:SBUX) have been praised for their political activism and benefits policies for LGBT workers (and their partners) and it seems that those stances create a positive "halo effect" for many consumers.

Is Controversy Bad for Business?
If there is money to be had in appearing (or being) LGBT-friendly, that has to be set against the potential costs. There are two diametrically opposed viewpoints on whether companies should get involved in controversial issues - there are those who believe that almost any publicity is useful, while others view a company expressing any opinion as risk-taking without any likely benefit.

The truth is almost certainly more complicated; there are certainly some positions that would be universally bad for the company (I don't think anybody would support a pro-child labor policy, for instance). However, for the most part, LGBT marketing is a less divisive issue than some believe. Various opinion polls suggest that most customers have accepted the marketing campaigns as a normal part of the evolution of business and, in fact, they may be already blending into the overall background noise of advertising.

On the flip side, taking the other side of the issue can be quite risky. Chick-Fil-A generated enormous controversy when its president Dan Cathy affirmed its conservative Christian policy stances. Curiously, this kerfuffle was never about accusations that the company mistreated LGBT employees or customers; rather just that the company's owners support conservative causes.

Likewise, Target (NYSE:TGT) found itself targeted with boycotts and protests when it became public knowledge that the company donated to a conservative political group in Minnesota, even though there was no evidence that the group's stance on LGBT rights had motivated the donation (conservative groups often also have highly pro-business agendas). There's also the more serious case of Cracker Barrel (Nasdaq:CBRL) - in years past, the company appeared to actively discriminate against LGBT employees and customers, but the outcry (protests, boycotts and lawsuits) ultimately led the company to adopt stronger anti-discrimination policies.

How Much Do Companies Really Have at Stake?
I think it's also well worth asking the question of whether or not companies really have that much at stake in taking an LGBT-friendly approach with their marketing and/or corporate policies. Boycotts are nothing new and many Fortune 500 companies find themselves targeted by boycotts over this or that issue every year - most of these boycotts amount to little more than protesters showing up outside the company's headquarters for a few days or weeks, and seldom is there an identifiable impact on sales.

In many cases, consumers are not as quick to change their habits as we sometime believe, and in other cases, they may have no choice. Consider the cases of Kraft (NYSE:KFT) or JC Penney (NYSE:JCP). Both companies were targeted by groups after a rainbow-colored Oreo campaign and the hiring of Ellen DeGeneres, respectively. In neither case was there a meaningful negative consequence - in fact, the controversy seems to have stimulated sales for both companies and One Millions Moms dropped their attempt to boycott JC Penney; likely because it seemed to be generating considerable sympathy, support and interest in JC Penney.

Boeing (NYSE:BA) has long been an LGBT-friendly company; are people going to cancel their travel plans or refuse to fly on a Boeing plane as result? Will they stop using Amazon (Nasdaq: AMZN) and willingly pay more for merchandise? And what about a company like IBM (NYSE:IBM) - a company with virtually no consumer business anymore? Maybe some businesses will refuse to buy/use IBM hardware, software or services over their LGBT-friendly policies, but it doesn't seem like an especially likely or large risk.

The Bottom Line
While LGBT issues are still socially and politically divisive, it's less clear that courting LGBT customers and employees offers any real risk for businesses. Although there may be very specific types of businesses that have to be very careful, the ultimate reality appears to be that most people do not feel strongly enough to stop patronizing corporations that target this market. In actual fact, it increasing seems like the opposite may be true - companies that aren't seen as conforming to the new norms may find it harder to attract and retain the customers and employers they want.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Why did Wal-Mart's Stock Take a Fall in 2015?

    Wal-Mart is the largest company in the world, with a sterling track-record of profits and dividends. So why has its stock fallen sharply in 2015?
  2. Investing

    Retailers Rebel Against Black Friday: Bad Move?

    The Black Friday creep may have hit a wall as some stores are shutting their doors on Thanksgiving and even Black Friday to give employees the day off.
  3. Entrepreneurship

    3 Ways You Can Support Small Business Growth

    Discover a number of different options available to support small business growth, including crowdfunding campaigns and shopping locally.
  4. Stock Analysis

    When Will Dick's Sporting Goods Bounce Back? (DKS)

    Is DKS a bargain here?
  5. Professionals

    Advisors: Do You Need to Tweak Your Marketing?

    Advisors use a variety of marketing techniques to attract clients, but they don't all work. It may be time to evaluate what is, and isn't, successful.
  6. Stock Analysis

    Home Depot: Can its Shares Continue Climbing?

    Home Depot has outperformed the market by a wide margin in the last 12 months. Is this sustainable?
  7. Stock Analysis

    Has Urban Outfitters Lost its Way? (URBN)

    Urban Outfitters just made a bold move. Will it pay off?
  8. Stock Analysis

    Is Walmart's Rally Sustainable? (WMT)

    Walmart is enjoying a short-term rally. Is it sustainable? Is Amazon still a better bet?
  9. Personal Finance

    Wal-Mart vs. Target: Which One Is A Bigger Threat To Amazon?

    Walmart and Target both revealed multi-year plans to grow their businesses. Which of these two retailers is the biggest threat to Amazon?
  10. Stock Analysis

    Are the Brands Millennials Love a Good Buy?

    Millennials make up a very big — and thus important —c onsumer generation. So if they love a brand, its stock is likely to outperform, right?
  1. Is a financial advisor allowed to pay a referral fee?

    A financial advisor is allowed to pay a referral fee to a third party for soliciting clients. However, the Securities and ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. How does a long tail become profitable?

    A long tail becomes profitable because the costs to produce, market and distribute a product or service in a niche are low, ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How do companies with a large product portfolio use BCG Analysis?

    BCG analysis is used to evaluate an organization's product portfolio in sales planning and marketing. It is specifically ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. What are the similarities between product differentiation and product positioning?

    Product differentiation and product positioning are important elements in a marketing plan, and most marketing strategies ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What are the major categories of financial risk for a company?

    There are many ways to categorize a company's financial risks. One possible perspective is provided by separating financial ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Why is product differentiation important in today's financial climate?

    Product differentiation is essential in today's financial climate. It allows the seller to contrast its own product with ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Hot Definitions
  1. Take A Flier

    The slang term for a decision to invest in highly speculative investments.
  2. Bar Chart

    A style of chart used by some technical analysts, on which, as illustrated below, the top of the vertical line indicates ...
  3. Take A Bath

    A slang term referring to the situation of an investor who has experienced a large loss from an investment or speculative ...
  4. Black Friday

    1. A day of stock market catastrophe. Originally, September 24, 1869, was deemed Black Friday. The crash was sparked by gold ...
  5. Turkey

    Slang for an investment that yields disappointing results or turns out worse than expected. Failed business deals, securities ...
  6. Barefoot Pilgrim

    A slang term for an unsophisticated investor who loses all of his or her wealth by trading equities in the stock market. ...
Trading Center