Whether it's due to the rise of social media and the phenomenon of the immediate sharing of views and opinions or just an intensification of the "culture wars" that seem to occur everywhere throughout history, where we eat and shop now has more political and social overtones than ever before. In particular, companies are finding that they must be very careful in how they attempt to position themselves towards Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered (LGBT) customers.

Targeted Marketing Has a Long Tradition
While explicitly looking to appeal to LGBT customers may aggravate or antagonize some people, the reality is that it's a natural outgrowth of what companies have been doing with their marketing for decades. Mass marketing is fine, but companies have long known that they can increase their sales by also running ads that appeal to specific groups.

While I may be trafficking in stereotypes here, a company is not going to attract female shoppers in the 34 to 50 age group with commercials featuring a lot of explosions and crass jokes, just like ads with middle-aged women sitting on a couch and having a quiet chat aren't going to sell a product to teenaged boys.

In the case of the LGBT community, you're talking about a market estimated to include about 9 million people, with nearly $800 billion in annual buying power. That's a market worth trying to court, to say nothing of the fact that taking the opposite approach (looking to exclude or offend this group) may not only alienate this market, but also have a spillover effect to those who consider themselves "friends and family." Likewise, a company's employment and benefits policies can often act as a positive marketing factor - companies such as Levi's, Nike (NYSE:NKE) and Starbucks (Nasdaq:SBUX) have been praised for their political activism and benefits policies for LGBT workers (and their partners) and it seems that those stances create a positive "halo effect" for many consumers.

Is Controversy Bad for Business?
If there is money to be had in appearing (or being) LGBT-friendly, that has to be set against the potential costs. There are two diametrically opposed viewpoints on whether companies should get involved in controversial issues - there are those who believe that almost any publicity is useful, while others view a company expressing any opinion as risk-taking without any likely benefit.

The truth is almost certainly more complicated; there are certainly some positions that would be universally bad for the company (I don't think anybody would support a pro-child labor policy, for instance). However, for the most part, LGBT marketing is a less divisive issue than some believe. Various opinion polls suggest that most customers have accepted the marketing campaigns as a normal part of the evolution of business and, in fact, they may be already blending into the overall background noise of advertising.

On the flip side, taking the other side of the issue can be quite risky. Chick-Fil-A generated enormous controversy when its president Dan Cathy affirmed its conservative Christian policy stances. Curiously, this kerfuffle was never about accusations that the company mistreated LGBT employees or customers; rather just that the company's owners support conservative causes.

Likewise, Target (NYSE:TGT) found itself targeted with boycotts and protests when it became public knowledge that the company donated to a conservative political group in Minnesota, even though there was no evidence that the group's stance on LGBT rights had motivated the donation (conservative groups often also have highly pro-business agendas). There's also the more serious case of Cracker Barrel (Nasdaq:CBRL) - in years past, the company appeared to actively discriminate against LGBT employees and customers, but the outcry (protests, boycotts and lawsuits) ultimately led the company to adopt stronger anti-discrimination policies.

How Much Do Companies Really Have at Stake?
I think it's also well worth asking the question of whether or not companies really have that much at stake in taking an LGBT-friendly approach with their marketing and/or corporate policies. Boycotts are nothing new and many Fortune 500 companies find themselves targeted by boycotts over this or that issue every year - most of these boycotts amount to little more than protesters showing up outside the company's headquarters for a few days or weeks, and seldom is there an identifiable impact on sales.

In many cases, consumers are not as quick to change their habits as we sometime believe, and in other cases, they may have no choice. Consider the cases of Kraft (NYSE:KFT) or JC Penney (NYSE:JCP). Both companies were targeted by groups after a rainbow-colored Oreo campaign and the hiring of Ellen DeGeneres, respectively. In neither case was there a meaningful negative consequence - in fact, the controversy seems to have stimulated sales for both companies and One Millions Moms dropped their attempt to boycott JC Penney; likely because it seemed to be generating considerable sympathy, support and interest in JC Penney.

Boeing (NYSE:BA) has long been an LGBT-friendly company; are people going to cancel their travel plans or refuse to fly on a Boeing plane as result? Will they stop using Amazon (Nasdaq: AMZN) and willingly pay more for merchandise? And what about a company like IBM (NYSE:IBM) - a company with virtually no consumer business anymore? Maybe some businesses will refuse to buy/use IBM hardware, software or services over their LGBT-friendly policies, but it doesn't seem like an especially likely or large risk.

The Bottom Line
While LGBT issues are still socially and politically divisive, it's less clear that courting LGBT customers and employees offers any real risk for businesses. Although there may be very specific types of businesses that have to be very careful, the ultimate reality appears to be that most people do not feel strongly enough to stop patronizing corporations that target this market. In actual fact, it increasing seems like the opposite may be true - companies that aren't seen as conforming to the new norms may find it harder to attract and retain the customers and employers they want.

Related Articles
  1. Investing News

    Hearst and Condé Nast in the Digital Age

    Condé Nast and Hearst are converting potential loss into opportunity by adapting to the digital age and transforming their products and operations.
  2. Investing

    Why Disrupting Television Will Take Time 

    The growing popularity of YouTube and Netflix has given rise to dire predictions about television's death. But here's why the medium may prove to be resilient.
  3. Stock Analysis

    What Makes the 'Share a Coke' Campaign So Successful?

    Understand how Coca-Cola implemented the successful "Share a Coke" campaign. Learn about the top three reasons why the campaign was successful.
  4. Insurance

    Using LinkedIn to Find Life Insurance Leads

    Learn how LinkedIn can help you generate leads as a life insurance agent, and understand the steps to turn your profile into a lead-generating machine.
  5. Professionals

    How to Break the Ice with New Clients

    Conducting an effective, initial client–advisor interview is an essential part of any advisor’s job. Here are a few tips on how to get started.
  6. Professionals

    Why Advisors Must Create a Mobile Strategy NOW

    Mobile devices will replace laptops and desktops. Financial advisors must deal with this revolution to ensure their marketing strategies are up to speed.
  7. Professionals

    Why Near-Retirees Shouldn't Sweat the Volatility

    With the stock market bumpy, some folks nearing retirement might be nervous. Here's how to create some wiggle room for your portfolio.
  8. Professionals

    Fund and ETF Strategies for Volatile Markets

    Looking for short-term fixes in reaction to market volatility? Here are a few strategies — and their downsides.
  9. Entrepreneurship

    Top 3 Most Successful Korean Entrepreneurs

    Discover the backgrounds of some of the most successful Korean entrepreneurs and information about the companies and projects leading to their success.
  10. Stock Analysis

    The Biggest Risks of Investing in Amazon Stock

    Find out which risks are most important to Amazon's shareholders. Learn which operational risks impact share prices and which financial risks affect investors.
  1. Is a financial advisor allowed to pay a referral fee?

    A financial advisor is allowed to pay a referral fee to a third party for soliciting clients. However, the Securities and ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. How does a long tail become profitable?

    A long tail becomes profitable because the costs to produce, market and distribute a product or service in a niche are low, ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How do companies with a large product portfolio use BCG Analysis?

    BCG analysis is used to evaluate an organization's product portfolio in sales planning and marketing. It is specifically ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. What are the similarities between product differentiation and product positioning?

    Product differentiation and product positioning are important elements in a marketing plan, and most marketing strategies ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Why is product differentiation important in today's financial climate?

    Product differentiation is essential in today's financial climate. It allows the seller to contrast its own product with ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What are the major categories of financial risk for a company?

    There are many ways to categorize a company's financial risks. One possible perspective is provided by separating financial ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Hot Definitions
  1. Purchasing Power

    The value of a currency expressed in terms of the amount of goods or services that one unit of money can buy. Purchasing ...
  2. Real Estate Investment Trust - REIT

    A REIT is a type of security that invests in real estate through property or mortgages and often trades on major exchanges ...
  3. Section 1231 Property

    A tax term relating to depreciable business property that has been held for over a year. Section 1231 property includes buildings, ...
  4. Term Deposit

    A deposit held at a financial institution that has a fixed term, and guarantees return of principal.
  5. Zero-Sum Game

    A situation in which one person’s gain is equivalent to another’s loss, so that the net change in wealth or benefit is zero. ...
  6. Capitalization Rate

    The rate of return on a real estate investment property based on the income that the property is expected to generate.
Trading Center
You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!