Long in coming and widely anticipated, the Fed announced September 13 that it would launch another effort to stimulate the economy through further monetary policy actions. The implications extend not to the tens of billions of dollars that will be spent on mortgage-backed securities, but also into the interest rate, equity and commodity markets, as well as the global economy.

Why, What and for How Long?
In response to what Fed Chairman Bernanke essentially described as an unacceptably weak job market, the FOMC has decided to launch further monetary stimulus. In addition to the ongoing "Operation Twist" (which will continue to year-end), the Fed will be looking to buy up to $40 billion a month in mortgage-backed securities. In addition, the Fed will apparently be looking to keep interest rates very low going into 2015.

With the combination of the new MBS purchase program and the ongoing Operation Twist, the Fed will be increasing its bond holdings by about $85 billion per month through year-end. Extending this out through 2013, Zero Hedge has forecasted that the Fed's balance sheet could hit $4 trillion by the end of next year.

While this is the third major round of actions of this sort, there were several aspects of the plan that were a little different. First, the plan is open-ended - targeted to continue "until economic conditions improve," though specific goals were not provided. Secondly, this is the first plan that has been launched with a specific target of improved employment. Last and not least, the Fed is launching this program while simultaneously expressing some general optimism about the economy (absent the employment situation).

How Will the Markets Respond?
Initial reaction to the Fed's announcement went along fairly predictable lines - stocks were up, bonds were up, the dollar was down, and hard assets such as gold and oil jumped.

In the past, low rates have spurred investors to load up on riskier assets (since the risk-free rates are so low) and there's little obvious reason to assume this time will be different. That does not mean that further momentum in the stock market is a given, though. While low rates encourage riskier investments, economic weakness scares investors, and enthusiasm for stocks won't last if companies such as Caterpillar, Boeing, Ford and General Electric lower their guidance and growth expectations. Likewise, low rates are a challenge for insurance companies and banks that do not increase their lending activity.

Hard assets such as gold should do well, as monetary stimulus essentially devalues the dollar and raises the risk of higher inflation down the road. It's more difficult to say the same about oil, which responds to other factors, such as political instability (like the recent riots in Egypt and Libya) and the global economic outlook. Property can also do well. While prior rounds of monetary stimulus have not led to soaring housing prices in the U.S., they have led to more money flowing to real estate in markets long Hong Kong.

Will the Economy Respond?
As I said earlier, the goal of this latest action is explicit - to bring down an unemployment rate that has been stubbornly high for several years now. In point of fact, the real unemployment rate is likely quite a bit worse than the 8% or so figure commonly cited. Instead, a look at the U-6 number suggests that real unemployment might be closer to 20%. Having so many people out of work, or inadequately employed, and weak demand for labor keeping wage growth so low has had a lot to do with the poor pace of the economic recovery, and it's not a big surprise that the Fed is targeting this metric.

If this policy works, it will be through encouraging consumers to borrow money at low rates and then spend it on goods and services, and encouraging businesses to use low rates to fund capacity expansions and hire more workers.

The big question, though, is whether this latest action will help. After all, QE1 and QE2 didn't boost employment (though an argument can be made that they kept the employment situation from getting worse), and interest rates were already low before this announcement. It also does nothing to address a basic problem in the economy - businesses are demanding workers with training in areas such as healthcare, computer science and specialized industrial skills (like welding), but the market is supplying a lot of liberal arts graduates and workers who didn't go to college (or in some cases, didn't finish high school).

Banks are also reticent to take on risk and lend, choosing instead to borrow cheaply and invest in securities. Likewise, many corporations are flush with cash, but reluctant to commit to expansion and hiring in the face of soft consumer demand and significant uncertainty regarding fiscal policy (taxation, budget deficits, government spending and so on).

There are also risks from this latest action. If this monetary easing leads to a rise in prices for commodities such as oil, natural gas and agricultural goods, it effectively works as a tax increase on consumers. Second, low rates and high "hidden" inflation are a powerfully negative one-two punch for retirees. Last and not least, deliberately manipulating interest rates lower is risky, as it interferes with the information and signals that the market is supposed to send to both consumers and producers.

The Bottom Line
More likely than not, this latest round of easing will spur fierce debate between those still committed to the Keynesian theory that the government needs to spend its way out of this malaise, and those steadfast in their belief that not only will this plan fail to improve employment, but it will also lead to dangerous inflation down the road. Although the present low velocity of money and low wage growth argue against serious near-term inflation, the problem with monetary policy moves is that the interval between action and reaction/response can be long and uncertain.

It's also worth noting that the Fed is only one part of the equation. While the Fed has gone "all in" trying to stimulate economic growth and employment, businesses and consumers are still waiting for Congress to make its move. More clarity on policies regarding taxation, budgeting, borrowing and infrastructure spending will be needed if the Fed's moves are to have any positive impact.

In the meantime, it seems reasonable to expect ongoing momentum in hard assets such as gold and silver, low interest rates and nervous balance in equities between a pro-risk low-rate environment and softening underlying fundamentals.

Related Articles
  1. Economics

    3 Reasons Iran is Important in 2016

    Learn about how the global economy and Iran will be affected by the recently lifted trade embargo and sanctions from Iran, and what it means for 2016.
  2. Investing News

    How Interest Rates Can Go Negative

    Central banks from Europe to Japan have implemented a negative interest rate policy (NIRP) in order to stimulate economic growth.
  3. Economics

    How Bernie Sanders Has Avoided Big Money (Mostly)

    Bernie Sanders hasn't entirely avoided PACs with his fundraising, but he has gotten a lot of bang for the buck
  4. Investing News

    U.S. Recession Without a Yield Curve Warning?

    The inverted yield curve has correctly predicted past recessions in the U.S. economy. However, that prediction model may fail in the current scenario.
  5. Investing News

    Obama Wants to Double Wall Street Regulation

    President Obama wants to double the budgets of the SEC and the CFTC over the next five years.
  6. Economics

    Does Big Money Hurt or Help Clinton and Rubio?

    Marco Rubio and Hillary Clinton lead their parties in raising money from Wall Street. Is that a help or a hindrance?
  7. Economics

    The Delicate Dance of Inflation and GDP

    Investors must understand inflation and gross domestic product, or GDP, well enough to make decisions without becoming buried in data.
  8. Active Trading

    Market Efficiency Basics

    Market efficiency theory states that a stock’s price will fully reflect all available and relevant information at any given time.
  9. Economics

    The History of Stock Exchanges

    Stock exchanges began with countries who sailed east in the 1600s, braving pirates and bad weather to find goods they could trade back home.
  10. Economics

    Industries That Thrive On Recession

    Recessions are not equally hard on everyone. In fact, there are some industries that even flourish amid the adversity.
RELATED FAQS
  1. What is comparative advantage?

    Comparative advantage is an economic law that demonstrates the ways in which protectionism (mercantilism, at the time it ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. How does the Wall Street Journal prime rate forecast work?

    The prime rate forecast is also known as the consensus prime rate, or the average prime rate defined by the Wall Street Journal ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What's the difference between microeconomics and macroeconomics?

    Microeconomics is generally the study of individuals and business decisions, macroeconomics looks at higher up country and ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How do you make working capital adjustments in transfer pricing?

    Transfer pricing refers to prices that a multinational company or group charges a second party operating in a different tax ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Marginal propensity to Consume (MPC) Vs. Save (MPS)

    Historically, because people in the United States have shown a higher propensity to consume, this is likely the more important ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What happens if interest rates increase too quickly?

    When interest rates increase too quickly, it can cause a chain reaction that affects the domestic economy as well as the ... Read Full Answer >>
Hot Definitions
  1. Black Swan

    An event or occurrence that deviates beyond what is normally expected of a situation and that would be extremely difficult ...
  2. Inverted Yield Curve

    An interest rate environment in which long-term debt instruments have a lower yield than short-term debt instruments of the ...
  3. Socially Responsible Investment - SRI

    An investment that is considered socially responsible because of the nature of the business the company conducts. Common ...
  4. Presidential Election Cycle (Theory)

    A theory developed by Yale Hirsch that states that U.S. stock markets are weakest in the year following the election of a ...
  5. Super Bowl Indicator

    An indicator based on the belief that a Super Bowl win for a team from the old AFL (AFC division) foretells a decline in ...
Trading Center