In 2008, at the brink of the subprime meltdown, President George W. Bush signed in to law a highly controversial bill that provided help to struggling banks who looked to be destined for bankruptcy. Not only did the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) provide aid to the banks, but it was that bill that gave America a new political buzzword: bailout.

TUTORIAL: Credit Crisis

Americans saw a price tag of $700 billion and immediately associated this figure with money lost. Each American citizen would contribute about $2,200 to a fund that would bailout greedy banks. Even today, especially during an election season, TARP has become an American poster child for corporate greed. Is it entirely accurate for Americans to hold such a grudge for TARP? Possibly not. Let's take a look at TARP three years later. (For a look at past government interventions in the market, read Top 6 U.S. Government Financial Bailouts.)


Not Even Close to $700 Billion
Although TARP was authorized for $700 billion, the price tag never came close to it. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), in March of 2011, $432 of the $700 billion has been disbursed. Although there will be further payments, they are minute compared to the intended amount.

It Was Supposed to Cost $300 Billion
Seven hundred billion wouldn't have been as hard for American taxpayers to swallow if they were going to get it all back. From the beginning, TARP was intended to be an investment by the
U.S. Treasury, but large-scale losses were worked into the figure. Original estimates forecasted tax payers losing $300 billion, but three years later the program is on track to beat those estimates.

The CBO, in its March 2011 report, found that the estimated loss was only $19 billion while other independent estimates forecast that TARP may cost nothing at all. The actual losses are largely dependent on the future growth of the investment markets and how they affect the value of the warrants and common stock positions still held by the Treasury.

The Banks
Of the $245 billion invested into the banks, $169 billion, or 68%, has been paid back with interest. Wells Fargo held its TARP money for 14 months before paying it back. In those 14 months, they paid the Treasury $132 million in

dividend payments. Because the Treasury requires an equity stake in the form of preferred stock, warrants or senior debt securities, all companies receiving TARP money have to pay it back with interest or dividend payments.

Most of the other banks, including Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs and American Express have paid the Treasury in full.

The Auto Industry
To date, Chrysler has paid back $10.6 billion of the $12.5 billion that it borrowed. General Motors has paid $8.1 billion of the total $13.4 billion. Of the $80 billion borrowed in total, only $29 billion has been repaid. So far, it appears that it is the auto industry, not the banks, who may deserve the brunt of the taxpayer wrath.

The Bottom Line
Although some of the outstanding funds will never be paid back, the CBO believes that most of it will. Once dividends, capital appreciation on the warrants and stock appreciation is factored in at future market prices, TARP may end up being a program that provided needed assistance that resulted in a large amount of American jobs saved. (For additional reading, check out How The U.S. Government Formulates Monetary Policy.)

Related Articles
  1. Economics

    Will North and South Korea Ever Reunite?

    North and South Korea have been divided for over six decades. Some analysts think the two countries could reunify within the next 10 years.
  2. Economics

    The Top 9 Things to Know About Hillary Clinton's Economic View

    Find out where former secretary of state and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton stands on the economy, jobs, trade and education.
  3. Economics

    Is Argentina a Socialist Country?

    Find out why it does not really make sense to call Argentina a socialist country, even though the South American nation has many socialistic tendencies.
  4. Professionals

    Holding Out for Capital Gains Could Be a Mistake

    Holding stocks for the sole purpose of avoiding short-term capital gains taxes may be a mistake, especially if all the signs say get out.
  5. Term

    What is the Macro Environment?

    The macro environment is the conditions existing in an economy as a whole, rather than in a single sector or region.
  6. Economics

    How Does National Income Accounting Work?

    National income accounting is an economic term describing the system used by a country to gather data and determine aggregate economic activity.
  7. Economics

    What is a Free Rider Problem?

    In economics, the free rider problem refers to someone being able to get, for less or even for free, what others pay more for.
  8. Stock Analysis

    How GM Keeps on Truckin'

    Following a giant bailout and a giant IPO, the new GM is carried by sales of its giant trucks. But is it profitable?
  9. Investing News

    Will Arch Coal file for Bankruptcy?

    In the last four years, Arch Coal Inc. (ACI) has been facing headwinds from lower price of coal amid global oversupply. The shares of ACI have lost nearly 99% of their value this year.
  10. Economics

    2 Countries That Are Friends With North Korea

    Learn about the few international allies of North Korea and the reasons the country is largely politically isolated from the rest of the world.
RELATED TERMS
  1. Section 1231 Property

    A tax term relating to depreciable business property that has ...
  2. Emergency Banking Act Of 1933

    A bill passed during the administration of former U.S. President ...
  3. Gross Domestic Product - GDP

    The monetary value of all the finished goods and services produced ...
  4. Regional Asset Liquidation Agreement ...

    An agreement between an asset manager and the Federal Deposit ...
  5. The New Deal

    A series of domestic programs designed to help the United States ...
  6. Accelerated Resolution Program ...

    A program designed to reduce the time and cost of resolving failed ...
RELATED FAQS
  1. What does it mean when someone refers to the "Big Three" automobile sector?

    The Big Three refers to the top three American automotive companies. The Big Three comprises Chrysler, General Motors and ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Where are the Social Security administration headquarters?

    The U.S. Social Security Administration, or SSA, is headquartered in Woodlawn, Maryland, a suburb just outside of Baltimore. ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What is the Social Security administration responsible for?

    The main responsibility of the U.S. Social Security Administration, or SSA, is overseeing the country's Social Security program. ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Is the Social Security administration a government corporation?

    The U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) is a government agency, not a government corporation. President Franklin Roosevelt ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. How does the role of Medicare/Medicaid affect the drugs sector in the U.S.?

    Medicare and Medicaid have enormous influence on the pharmaceutical, or drugs, sector in the United States. For instance, ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What are the ethical arguments against government subsidies to companies like Tesla?

    The ethical argument behind government subsidies is that they should be put into place to help industries that will, in turn, ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
×

You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!