What The Failure Of The Super Committee Means
Deadlocked on their refusals to compromise on recommendations for cutting the government deficit, both Republican and Democrat members of the Super Committee of legislators, appointed to start resolving this problem, have admitted defeat.

TUTORIAL: Macroeconomics

Goals and Conflict
The 12-member, bipartisan committee was unable to agree on a single measure to reduce the immense government debt of about $15,000 billion and growing daily. The committee's mission was to recommend $1,200 billion in deficit reductions, over the next ten years. Among the items on the table for discussion and negotiation were raising taxes, revamping the tax code, plugging tax loopholes, lowering the 35% corporate tax rate, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and the federal retirement program. Democrats refused to cut entitlement programs, such as Social Security and Medicare. Republicans refused to increase taxes.

The result: stalemate. However, additional far-reaching results may ensue from the committee's failure. On the day before the official announcement of the committee's failure, the Dow Jones Industrial average, anticipating the deadlock, dropped 248.85 points, a loss of 2.1%. At the close of markets on Tuesday, Nov. 22, the Dow Jones had fallen an additional 53.59 points.

Results of Failure
Without a deal to cut government debt, some economists and financial analysts have forecast a further down-grading of U.S. government bonds, by ratings services such as Moody's and Standard & Poor's. This means the government may have to pay higher interest rates to sell bonds, further increasing its debt. (For more, read How Countries Deal With Debt.)

The super committee's failure automatically triggers $1,200 billion in mandatory cuts in government spending, beginning in 2013, with about $600 billion cut from military spending and the remainder from entitlement programs. Even after the automatic spending cuts for 2013 are made, total U.S. government spending for that year would be above the level projected in 2007 by 32%.

Congress and military officials are justifiably worried about the impact on national security of a $600 billion cut in Pentagon spending. On this issue, the President has the option of introducing a resolution to reconsider the defense cuts, which is likely. Terms of this option prohibit a filibuster as an effort to squelch the move.

Legislators of both the House and Senate were also looking for ways to side-step the automatic cuts in defense spending. The Senate has moved some $10 billion from the general budget to the Pentagon budget, to make up the anticipated reduction in spending. Before the cuts are implemented, however, Congress has at least a year to repeal or reduce the mandated defense spending cuts, and some lawmakers have already begun working toward that end, arguing their case and gathering support. President Obama promised to veto any bill that reduced the spending cuts. Even after the automatic spending cuts for 2013 are made, total U.S. government spending for that year would be above the level projected in 2007 by 32%.

What Does the Future Hold?
Seniors and older baby boomers now entering their senior years are similarly worried about the automatic cut in Medicare benefits. In the wake of the deadlock, a growing public displeasure and frustration with Congress increased even more, according to reports. In an election year, this is especially troubling for both parties, as they look at a possible voter backlash.

If the deficit is not reduced, long term negative results on the U.S. economy may mirror what's currently happening in Europe, according to some financial experts. Several countries in the European union, including Greece, Italy and Spain, face recession and potential defaults on their debts, or they must print more money, causing runaway inflation, to pay down their obligations. (For more, read Breaking Down The U.S. Budget Deficit.)

The Bottom Line
The electorate, at least 9% of whom are unemployed, and many in financial straits, is not happy with the non-results of the super committee. Yet a large percentage of the voting public, both Republicans and Democrat, are against any compromise with the opposing party. The coming Presidential and Congressional elections will reflect the national mood and may be a reliable forecaster of future development in this ongoing crisis.

comments powered by Disqus
Trading Center