The technology sector is a merciless market and there are few "fade into the sunset" stories. Instead, whenever and wherever there is success, a horde of rivals soon follow with the express intention of taking what you do best, doing it a little (or a lot) better and driving you out of business. The rise of Research In Motion (Nasdaq:RIMM) was unexpected and remarkable, virtually tethering a whole generation of workers to their jobs in a way never quite achieved before, but the fall has been just as remarkable. (For related reading, see Blackberry Continues Its Downward Motion.)

TUTORIAL: Stock-Picking Strategies

With the market having moved on from specialized one-function devices to do-everything smartphones, can Research In Motion adapt to and overcome the new competitive realities?

What Went Wrong
Like Palm before it and so many technology incumbents in general, Research In Motion rested on its laurels. Though the Blackberry had become a virtual must-have within any large organization, the company failed to think much outside of that narrowly-focused business market. It seems that management failed to grasp the importance of functions and features like music playback, Internet access, cameras and so on. So, while RIM dutifully continued to turn out slightly improved versions of older models, they were out-engineered and out-maneuvered by Apple (Nasdaq:AAPL) and the introduction of virtual do-everything devices.

Making matters worse, RIM has been slow to accept its shortcomings – particularly the extent to which it does (or does not) understand its customers' wants and needs. Where Apple has become famous for anticipating customer tastes, and Samsung adept at following, RIM has come off as quite a bit more clueless. Recent devices out of RIM have been panned as clunky, feature-poor and generally not what the market wants. The recent PlayBook tablet is perhaps the best example – though few companies outside of Apple, Samsung, Amazon (Nasdaq:AMZN) or Barnes & Noble (NYSE:BKS) have had much success with tablet-type devices, the PlayBook has been a near-disaster.

But that is not all that has bedeviled RIM. There have been inexcusable operational and execution errors as well. Service outages have earned the company ample bad publicity (and customer ire), and the dual CEO structure seems to be a sluggish, bureaucratic response to an industry that typically thrives on fast decision-making and clear visions from leadership. (To learn more about effective CEO leadership, read Top Qualities Of An Effective CEO.)

Can RIM Be Saved?
Is it all over for Research In Motion? Not necessarily. For starters, RIM still serves a growth industry. Although the overall phone market is not growing all that rapidly, smartphones are still well less than half of the phone market. Consequently, a good lineup of products could not only capture shares, but grow the smartphone market further.

Ironically, RIM may also be helped by one of the aspects of technology that led to its undoing. Apart from Apple, there is very little customer loyalty in technology. So long as a company doesn't put products out that are so bad as to destroy the brand name, users are happy to try something new if the price and feature set are right. In other words, RIM could be just one generation away from being relevant and competitive again.

Last and not least, turnarounds don't necessarily take all that long in this sector. Apple famously designed the iPhone virtually from scratch over 30 months and for approximately $150 million. Subsequent iterations have taken much less time to develop, and it is not as though RIM would have to start from scratch. Even granting that IP limits what RIM can do, with over $1 billion in cash on the balance sheet, development costs should not be a limiting factor.

What RIM Must Do
Perhaps it's counterintuitive, but if RIM wants a future, it has to forget the past. It needs to abandon legacy platforms and products that are no longer self-sustaining, and it needs to realize that it is now on the outside looking in when it comes to the industry leaders. Also, a healthy dose of humility must come – realizing that they have lost touch with their customers and fallen into the habit of telling consumers what they want instead of asking them.

It would also seem that the dual CEO structure has done the company no particular favors. As the oft-repeated joke about there being no statues erected to committees may suggest, real leadership does not come out of a consensus. RIM needs a single visionary leader with the ability to think ahead of the curve, the willingness to demand the almost-impossible and the full support of the board of directors. Said differently, there is little reason to believe that RIM can play the Samsung or HTC game of following design leaders but compensating with efficient execution, so RIM has to attempt to regain leadership in technology and design. (For related reading, see A Primer On Investing In The Tech Industry.)

The Bottom Line
With over $1 billion in cash on the books, Research In Motion will have many more shots on goal before the company is in serious risk of going away entirely. Although RIM does not have Nokia's (NYSE:NOK) remarkable world-wide share, the company does still have a foothold in the market and a brand that customers recognize.

Still, time is wasting and RIM's opportunity to rebound will not live forever. If the company can realize that past successes no longer mean anything to tomorrow's buyers and go back to the drawing board with fresh ideas, a comeback could be in the cards. Should RIM continue on its same stubborn path, though, it is likely to find itself too far behind the likes of Apple or Samsung to ever really be a growth story again. (Learn about Technology Sector Funds to get exposure to the sector as a whole.)

Related Articles
  1. Term

    Why You Should Consider Investing In the Tech Industry

    The technology industry offers huge investment opportunities.
  2. Investing Basics

    A Primer On Investing In The Tech Industry

    The tech sector can provide fantastic returns for investors with a little know-how in the field.
  3. Investing

    Why Are Startups Going International?

    Expansion into international markets, if it occurs, is the final stage of a startup's evolution. Lately, though, the opposite has been happening; international expansion now occurs fairly early ...
  4. Investing

    Sergey Brin Biography

    Sergey Brin is an American computer scientist and businessman, who, with Larry Page, co-founded Google, which is among the most profitable internet companies in the world.
  5. Entrepreneurship

    Top 10 Side Jobs You Could Start Now

    Ways to make extra cash in your spare time.
  6. Investing

    The European Effect on Google's Bottom Line

    The EU is turning up the heat on Google. What effect will it have on the company's bottom line?
  7. Stock Analysis

    Should You Follow Millionaires into This Sector?

    Millionaire investors—and those who follow them—should take another look at the current economic situation before making any more investment decisions.
  8. Stock Analysis

    The 6 Worst Technology Stocks of 2015

    Learn about the technology sector and how it has performed in 2015. Understand the six worst performing technology stocks by average return in 2015.
  9. Entrepreneurship

    Top 5 Startups That Emerged in Denver

    Learn why Denver is one of the hottest markets in America for startups, and identify five of the top startups that are emerging from the Denver market.
  10. Entrepreneurship

    Top 5 Startups That Emerged in Raleigh

    Learn about the startup scene in the Research Triangle hub of Raleigh, North Carolina. Discover which startups are the hottest to emerge from this tech city.
  1. Google Blogger

    Google Blogger is a free publishing platform run by Google (GOOGL). ...
  2. Wordpress (CMS)

    Wordpress is widely considered easy to use and is the CMS of ...
  3. Content Farm

    Content farming has been likened to the “fast food” of the internet ...
  4. Contactless Payment

    Contactless payment is a secure method for consumers to purchase ...
  5. Information Management Technology ...

    Information management technology is the distribution, organization ...
  6. Enterprise Mobility

    Enterprise mobility describes a trend in business where work ...
  1. What is the QQQ ETF?

    The PowerShares QQQ, previously known as the QQQQ, is a widely held and traded exchange-traded fund (ETF) that gives investors ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Why does Warren Buffett largely avoid investing in the technology sector?

    Warren Buffett has often said that he avoids investing in the technology sector because he does not like to own stocks in ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why doesn't Warren Buffett own Apple (AAPL) stock?

    Warren Buffet claims he simply does not know how to properly evaluate Apple (AAPL) and does not feel confident in his reading ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. What economic factors influence corporate bond yields?

    The most telling signs that a tech stock is about to burst are no different from the signs of impending collapse of stocks ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Which sectors have similar pros and cons to the drugs sector?

    In financial terms, the drug sector has a high level of risk and growth. It must gather a lot of up-front investment to drive ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Does technology follow the law of diminishing marginal returns?

    The law of diminishing marginal returns does sometimes apply to the technology industry. The law states that as employee ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center

You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!