Public companies are generally not controlled by few shareholders; however, as more companies adopt "dual class" structures the numbers will continue to rise.

In dual class companies, economic rights are separated from voting rights, and voting control is concentrated in the hands of a few by giving select people a class of shares that carry more than one vote each.

For example, the April 15 IPO of Moelis & Co. (NYSE: Alibaba rejected its local stock exchange in Hong Kong for the NYSE because Hong Kong won't list companies with dual class structures.

Jon Lukomnik, Executive Director of the IRRC Institute told Benzinga that, "For someone investing in a dual class company, they are anchored at the hip with the major shareholder. You had better be sure they are a benevolent dictator and that he or she will share the economic benefits of the company."

As a practical matter, Lukomnik advised that before buying, investors needed to take an "extra step; not only research the company but also the dominant shareholder."

See Also: Senate: Unqualified DHS Watchdog Improperly Catered To DHS Bigwigs

Lukomnik knows whereof he speaks.

In October 2012 IRRC and ISS published a study of "controlled" companies and their performance. The report found that dual class companies performed worse over 3-, 5- and 10-year horizons than uncontrolled single class, one share-one vote companies and worse than single class companies with a controlling shareholder--someone who had placed enough capital at risk to amass 30 percent or more of the outstanding shares. Dual class companies also had more related-party transactions and other problematic corporate governance features.

This 2007 academic study also found that dual class structures hurt share price.

The problem with dual class structures is the separation of economic and voting rights; the controlling shareholder(s) can enrich themselves through their control of the company even if their control depresses the stock price. This kind of self-dealing is happening at Swift Transportation (NYSE: SWFT), according to the Teamsters Union, which is a long-term shareholder of Swift. Swift CEO Jerry Moyes is a minority shareholder, but controls the company because his Class B shares come with two votes each compared to Class A's one.

In a November 2013 letter to the company's chairman, Ken Hall, the Teamsters' General Secretary-Treasurer, detailed the union's concerns with Moyes' management of Swift: "excessive pledging of stock by CEO Moyes" and "hundreds of millions of dollars in related-party transactions with Moyes-controlled businesses."

Hall concludes, "…the problem at Swift is its dual class stock structure, which gives disproportionate voting power and control to a single holder of a minority of the outstanding shares.”

[Excessive pledging of stock can lead to the forced sale of a large number of shares and hurt stock price, which has happened to Green Mountain Coffee and several others]

Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) shows both the trend to concentrate voting power without requiring the controlling shareholders to risk a commensurate amount of capital, and the common stockholders' inability to do anything about it. Google used two classes of stock at its IPO; Class A, sold to the public, which came with one vote per share, and Class B, held by insiders like founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, and Chairman Eric Schmidt, which comes with 10 votes.

See Also: Google Stock Split Should Have Icahn Fuming

That structure frustrated Google's Class A stockholders enough that about 80 percent voted to switch to a one share-one vote approach at the 2013 annual meeting. But instead of taking the hint, Google doubled down on concentrating power away from the public shareholders. Google issued Class C shares that come with no votes at all.

Google shareholders will get a chance to weigh in on this issue again at Google's 2014 annual meeting on May 14. However, given the voting structure, there is little chance the shareholder proposal to recapitalize with one vote per share will succeed.

Facebook (NASDAQ: FB) and several other tech companies use this approach. As the New York Times noted, Mark Zuckerberg will control Facebook even if he only owns 10 percent of its shares.

Beyond the effect on share price, the Times explained another risk is control inheritance: "had Apple gone public with Facebook's structure, Steven P. Jobs's widow, Laurene Powell Jobs, and Apple's co-founder Steve Wozniak (most recently a Dancing With The Stars contestant) would possibly still be in control."

Related Articles
  1. Budgeting

    Trunk Club Review: Is It Worth It?

    Take a close look at one of the best-known online clothing services in the country, and determine whether it's a good fit for your style and budget.
  2. Budgeting

    HelloFresh Review: Is It Worth It?

    Discover one of the world's most successful meal subscription services, and learn more about how the service operates and what it costs.
  3. Budgeting

    Just the Right Book Review: Is It Worth It?

    Take an in-depth look at Just the Right Book, a subscription service that delivers personalized book selections based on your reading history and preferences.
  4. Economics

    Can the Market Predict a Recession?

    Is a bear market an indication that a recession is on the horizon?
  5. Budgeting

    The Honest Company Bundles Review: Are They Worth It?

    Learn more about The Honest Company and its bundle subscription services, which deliver discounted diapers, formula and other baby products to your doorstep.
  6. Products and Investments

    The One Thing Your Portfolio Must Always Have

    Portfolio diversification is essential in any situation, but especially so as the market finally returns to fundamentals.
  7. Budgeting

    Blue Apron Review: Is It Worth It?

    Read about one of the top meal-kit delivery services in the United States, and learn more about what it offers and how much it costs.
  8. Budgeting

    Plated Review, Is It Worth It?

    Take a closer look at the ready-to-cook meal service, Plated, and learn how the company can help you take the hassle out of home cooking.
  9. Investing News

    How China's Economy is Now Like America's

    China's economy could take the global economy down with it; why that might be good news in the grand scheme.
  10. Investing News

    A 2016 Outlook: What January 2009 Can Teach Us

    January 2009 and January 2016 were similar from an investment standpoint, but from a forward-looking perspective, they were very different.
RELATED FAQS
  1. What is the long-term outlook of the metals and mining sector?

    An industry agency council was established by the World Economic Forum in 2014 to serve as an advisory board on the future ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the railroads sector?

    The railroads sector is comprised of publicly traded stocks for companies that operate railroad tracks and/or trains. Railroad ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Who are Amgen Inc.'s (AMGN) main competitors?

    Biotech giant Amgen Inc (AMGN) bills itself as one of the first biotechnology firms. It was founded in 1980 and has grown ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. What's the most expensive stock of all time?

    Back in late August 2012, Apple’s (AAPL) stock price reached nearly $700 per share. The stock has since split but has yet ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center