Although you wouldn't necessarily always know it by the growth rates at leading enterprise security vendors like Check Point (Nasdaq:CHKP) and Cisco (Nasdaq:CSCO), security has been one of the better markets in enterprise IT. So the real question in the wake of Fortinet's (Nasdaq:FTNT) warning on first quarter results is whether this is company-specific, market-specific, or a more widespread problem within the security sector.

Discount Brokers Comparison: Your one-stop shop for finding the perfect broker for your investments.

A Meaningful Miss On The Way
Fortinet announced Wednesday night that first quarter results were going to come in well shy of both sell-side expectations and prior management guidance.

Instead of the $140 million Wall Street revenue target, it looks like the number is about $135 million. Worse, billings are going to come in about 8% shy of the prior target. At these levels, the implied growth rate is about 8% and that's a worryingly low number for a big-multiple tech company.

While the revenue shortfall is likely to get most of the attention, I'm also concerned about the company's implied margins. I realize details like margins and cash flow are often afterthoughts to many tech investors, but I think they're important. To that end, it looks like the company's operating margin is going to be about 300bp to 600bp lower than most analysts in the market had been expecting. Whether that's due to lower yields on new products (costs/inefficiencies tied to the ramp and launch), more spending on sales, or what have you is something we'll have to wait for the full release to know.

SEE: Earning Forcasts: A Primer

A Fortinet Problem Or A Market/Sector Problem?
Fortinet blamed at least part of the miss on its inability to close multiple deals with major carriers. This echoes the warning we heard earlier from F5 (Nasdaq:FFIV) about weakness in carrier spending (and this is potentially a double-dose of bad news for Juniper (NYSE:JNPR)). It doesn't sound as though the carriers are abandoning Fortinet or delaying security products, but rather may be changing their buying habits/patterns (stretching it out instead of doing bigger one-time deals).

Here's the thing about that, though. Fortinet is a pretty aggressive price competitor. While I realize the businesses and products are very, very different, ADTRAN (Nasdaq:ADTN) is likewise a lower-price vendor of equipment for the carrier market and they had a pretty good report the other day. That gives me a little nagging doubt that maybe this miss wasn't just a one-time thing.

If this was just a carrier spending problem (coupled with weakness in Latin America and Europe), that could be relatively good news for companies like Check Point, Sourcefire (Nasdaq:FIRE), and Palo Alto (NYSE:PANW) given their market/customer exposures. Still, I would be careful about buying those stocks today on that thesis, as I believe there's mounting evidence that overall IT spending has slowed pretty considerably.

The Bottom Line
I continue to be conflicted on Fortinet. While I believe the company has good technology and could be a solid M&A candidate, I'm worried about a potential lack of breadth in security, particularly relative to the likes of Cisco and Check Point. At the same time, I have to ask why the company decided to acquire Coyote Point and compete with the likes of F5 and Citrix (Nasdaq:CTXS) in the very competitive (and quite possibly slowing) ADC market. I could see this helping the company in mobile carrier data centers and the small/medium-sized business market, but I still question the logic of the move.

SEE: Analyzing An Acquisition Announcement

In any case, Fortinet shares are down about 14% as of this writing. If you believe that the company can grow at a long-term rate in the low double-digits, that makes today's price pretty compelling. Keep in mind, though, that the summer is often a tough time for tech companies and particularly those that start off in the penalty box for missing expectations. While robust growth could make Fortinet an interesting stock from today's level, those same robust expectations do up the risk of an investment here to a meaningful extent.

At the time of writing, Stephen D. Simpson did not own any shares in any company mentioned in this article.

Related Articles
  1. Fundamental Analysis

    Key Players In Mergers And Acquisitions

    Strategic acquisition is becoming a part of doing business. Discover the different types of investor groups involved.
  2. Entrepreneurship

    Biggest Merger and Acquisition Disasters

    Find out which companies collapsed after merging.
  3. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  4. Investing

    What Investors Need to Know About Returns in 2016

    Last year wasn’t a great one for investors seeking solid returns, so here are three things we believe all investors need to know about returns in 2016.
  5. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  6. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  7. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  8. Stock Analysis

    The Top 5 Micro Cap Alternative Energy Stocks for 2016 (AMSC, SLTD)

    Follow a cautious approach when purchasing micro-cap stocks in the alternative energy sector. Learn about five alternative energy micro-caps worth considering.
  9. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Porter's Five Forces on Under Armour (UA)

    Learn about Under Armour and how it differentiates itself in the competitive athletic apparel industry in light of the Porter's Five Forces Model.
  10. Stock Analysis

    The Biggest Risks of Investing in Qualcomm Stock (QCOM, BRCM)

    Understand the long-term fundamental risks related to investing in Qualcomm stock, and how financial ratios also play into the investment consideration.
RELATED FAQS
  1. What is the difference between an acquisition and a takeover?

    There is no tangible difference between an acquisition and a takeover; both words can be used interchangeably - the only ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is Fibonacci retracement, and where do the ratios that are used come from?

    Fibonacci retracement is a very popular tool among technical traders and is based on the key numbers identified by mathematician ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What is the formula for calculating EBITDA?

    When analyzing financial fitness, corporate accountants and investors alike closely examine a company's financial statements ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How do I calculate the P/E ratio of a company?

    The price-earnings ratio (P/E ratio) is a valuation measure that compares the level of stock prices to the level of corporate ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. How do you calculate return on equity (ROE)?

    Return on equity (ROE) is a ratio that provides investors insight into how efficiently a company (or more specifically, its ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. How do you calculate working capital?

    Working capital represents the difference between a firm’s current assets and current liabilities. The challenge can be determining ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center