Chip giant Intel Corp. (Nasdaq:INTC) continues to work through a challenge that most leading tech companies face at some point in their corporate lives – what do you do when your bread-and-butter market has fundamentally changed? Santa Clara, Calif.-based Intel's efforts to engineer a second act have consumed considerable shareholder capital but have yet to show a lot for themselves, as the company's fab efforts are still sub-scale and the company lags San Diego's Qualcomm Inc.(Nasdaq:QCOM) in the mobile world.

The good news for Intel is that reports of the demise of PCs and servers are likely significantly exaggerated, meaning that Intel can harvest years of rich cash flow while other businesses gain scale. Intel is not likely to emerge as a winner in mobile, but the shares are still priced to generate reasonable returns from today's level.

Will Intel Get Squeezed Out of Mobile?

Despite excellent chip manufacturing and process capabilities, Intel has struggled to gain any real traction in mobile despite generous incentives to original equipment manufacturers. Qualcomm has staked out a leading position on the high end of baseband and mobile app processors and has hardly looked back since. While Intel continues to talk a strong, optimistic game, the reality is that adoption continues to lag and the company is churning through quite a lot of capital in trying to catch up.

A lot of companies are likely to see that ongoing operations in the mobile chip market just aren't a good long-term use of capital and that it is too difficult to carve out enough market share and revenue to make the ongoing R&D demands viable. On the opposite end of the spectrum sits Hsinchu, Taiwan-based MediaTek Inc. (TWSE:2454), a provider of chips for low-end and mid-range phones produced primarily by Asian OEMs. MediaTek has a cost structure that makes competing on the low end worthwhile; Qualcomm and MediaTek may basically squeeze out the other players.

Intel certainly has the capital to stay in the game longer than Santa Clara, Calif.-based Marvell Technology Group Ltd.(Nasdaq:MRVL) and Nvidia Corp. (Nasdaq:NVDA), or Irvine, Calif.-based Broadcom Corp. (Nasdaq:BRCM), but without meaningful design wins and share gains in the next 18 months or so, it will be increasingly hard to justify the spending.

Fabs Could Still Be a Good Opportunity

It was once thought that Hsinchu, Taiwan's Taiwan Semiconductor Mfg. Co. Ltd. (NYSE:TSM) was practically untouchable in the fab space, as the company always managed to stay a step (or more) ahead of other chip fabs. In recent years, though, Intel has significantly stepped up its game in line with transitions and chip structures, seriously challenging TSMC for technology leadership and the premiums that go with it for leading-edge capabilities.

There has been some debate lately as to whether TSMC's 16nm “FinFET Plus” has closed the gap. Even if Intel's lead isn't quite what Intel wants the market to believe, the fact remains that there is a lot of uncommitted potential at Intel for this business. San Jose, Calif.-based digital circuit maker Altera Corp. (Nasdaq:ALTR) is already on board as a fab customer, but there could be substantial opportunity here- particularly if Intel is willing to take on ARM licensees like Marvell or Nvidia.

Can PCs and Servers Bridge the Gap?

Intel's mobile efforts are likely to prove disappointing over the long term, but there is meaningful potential in further expanding the fab business. In the meantime, there are the large PC and server chip businesses to consider.

On one hand, it's easy to argue that Intel's share in these markets (over 80% in PCs and over 90% in servers) has nowhere to go but down. In the case of servers, there is a threat of oncoming competition with ARM-based microserver chips from Sunnyvale, Calif.-based Applied Micro Circuits Corp. (Nasdaq:AMCC), ​San Jose, Calif.-based Cavium Inc. (Nasdaq:CAVM), Marvell and Qualcomm, though the microserver market could take longer to materialize. On the PC side, while there has been some significant damage to this market, there is still a core base of demand that can provide ample revenue and cash flow for Intel, albeit not with much (if any) growth potential.

The Bottom Line

Weighing out the long-term challenges in PCs and servers against the prospects for growth led by mobile chips and fab services, I model long-term revenue growth for Intel of around 3% (against a trailing growth rate of 5%). On the FCF side, I expect Intel's margins to improve as the company better leverages past R&D investments and scales up the fab operations, leading to growth of around 3% to 4%. Discounted back, that works out to a fair value of over $26. At today's price, Intel does not look notably cheap, but it does look priced to generate mid-to-high single-digit annual returns (capital appreciation plus dividends). That's not remarkable, but it's not terrible relative to the market and it does still allow for some upside from the mobile efforts.

Disclosure: At the time of writing, the author owned shares of Broadcom.

Related Articles
  1. Investing News

    Alcatel-Lucent Is Bringing G.fast Technology to Taiwan (ALU, CHT)

    Learn more about the world's first commercial deployment of G.fast broadband access technology in a partnership between Alcatel-Lucent and Chunghwa Telecom.
  2. Stock Analysis

    3 Chip Makers Betting on the Drone Industry in 2016 (INTC, QCOM)

    Find out which of the big chip makers are betting heavily on a burgeoning consumer drone market that could be the next big wave in consumer electronics.
  3. Investing

    5 Up and Coming Social Media Startups

    Although the days of Facebook's dominance aren't close to being over, here are some new creative platforms gaining traction on the worldwide web.
  4. Investing News

    Public Vs. Private Tech Valuations: What's Driving the Divide?

    The gross valuations over the past five years are more indicative of the market than the true value of the company itself.
  5. Investing

    Why Does Amazon Let Its Competitors Use AWS? (AMZN,NFLX)

    Amazon allows dozens of its competitors use AWS. Is this a strategy to earn revenue or something more?
  6. Investing

    Cybersecurity Startups Are an Emerging Trend

    As cybersecurity spending across both government and private sectors continues to increase amid rising concern of security threats, the potential for cybersecurity startups has never been greater. ...
  7. Stock Analysis

    Top 5 Companies Owned By Microsoft (MSFT)

    Find out about Microsoft's most newsworthy acquisitions. Microsoft acquired Skype in 2011 to expand its footprint in the online telecommunications sector.
  8. Investing

    What Investors Need to Know About Returns in 2016

    Last year wasn’t a great one for investors seeking solid returns, so here are three things we believe all investors need to know about returns in 2016.
  9. Investing News

    The 4 Most Expensive Company Campuses

    Discover some of the most expensive company campuses in the world, why they are often designed so elaborately, and learn how this affects workers.
  10. Stock Analysis

    The Top 5 Semiconductor Penny Stocks for 2016 (ACLS, CAMT)

    Learn more about the semiconductor industry, and discover five penny stocks that investors seeking exposure to this industry should consider in 2016.
RELATED FAQS
  1. Is Taiwan a developed country?

    As of 2015, the CIA World Factbook has yet to add Taiwan to its list of developed countries. However, many organizations, ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Is Apple Pay safe and free?

    Apple Pay is a mobile payment system created by Apple to reduce the number of times shoppers and buyers have to pay for goods ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What is the QQQ ETF?

    The PowerShares QQQ, previously known as the QQQQ, is a widely held and traded exchange-traded fund (ETF) that gives investors ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Why does Warren Buffett largely avoid investing in the technology sector?

    Warren Buffett has often said that he avoids investing in the technology sector because he does not like to own stocks in ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Why doesn't Warren Buffett own Apple (AAPL) stock?

    Warren Buffet claims he simply does not know how to properly evaluate Apple (AAPL) and does not feel confident in his reading ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What economic factors influence corporate bond yields?

    The most telling signs that a tech stock is about to burst are no different from the signs of impending collapse of stocks ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center