Although I doubt there were many investors still holding serious hope that the first quarter of 2013 was going to end up being a good one for tech companies, IBM (NYSE:IBM) likely snuffed out those hopes with an uncommonly weak quarter. With Big Blue missing for the first time in eight years, and missing across the board, it's pretty clear that business conditions have slowed markedly. Management remains optimistic that business will recover with a strong second half, but even with the big post-earnings decline these shares are not exactly cheap.

Discount Brokers Comparison: Your one-stop shop for finding the perfect broker for your investments.

Q1 Weak Across The Top Line
IT spending seems to have hit the rocks in the first quarter, and that showed up across all of IBM's business units.

Revenue fell 5% as reported and 3% on a constant currency basis, as IBM missed the average sell-side guess by almost 5%. The company's largest business unit, services, saw revenue down 4% as reported, with a 2% constant currency decline in Global Tech and flat results in Global Business. Software did a little better, with revenue up 1% on a constant currency basis (down 1% reported), but still missed estimates. Last and definitely least, hardware revenue was down 13% excluding a divestiture.

The news didn't get much better in the profit lines. IBM reported a one-point increase in adjusted (non-GAAP) gross margin, and did slightly beat estimates, but adjusted operating income fell 1% and the company missed the sell-side margin target by more than a point. It's worth noting too that this is the first quarterly miss from IBM since the first quarter of 2005.

SEE: Understanding The Income Statement

Can Everybody Screw Up At Once?
The stereotype on Wall Street is that management teams are loathe to admit any fault, usually trying to pass the buck for poor performance on to “market conditions” or “macroeconomic factors”. Curiously, the opposite seems to be true this quarter in the software market. Management at Oracle (Nasdaq:ORCL), TIBCO (Nasdaq:TIBX), Red Hat (NYSE:RHT) and now IBM all cited “sales execution” issues for weak results this quarter, as deals slipped out of the quarter. I have a hard time buying that, and it seems to me that universal sales slippage may in fact be a sign that customers are nervous about the economy and looking to delay major spending decisions until they see business picking up.

Hardware Looking Scary
IBM isn't a perfect bellwether for tech hardware, but these results should still have investors on edge. The company's weak server performance can't be encouraging for other weak hands like Hewlett-Packard (NYSE:HPQ) or Dell (Nasdaq:DELL). Likewise, IBM's 10% decline in storage may point to more share gains for NetApp (Nasdaq:NTAP) and EMC (NYSE:EMC), but I'd argue that it also suggests weak quarters may be on the way for them as well.

On a more positive note, IBM seems to be continuing its policy of evolving with the times and jettisoning low-potential hardware lines. Specifically, management is looking to sell its x86 server business, and it sounds like Lenovo (Nasdaq:LNVGY) may be the company that buys it. Whether that's a good move for Lenovo is a subject for another day, but it's hard not to respect IBM's willingness to punt businesses with weak future prospects when so many other companies cling stubbornly to their legacy operations.

Are Better Days Ahead In Services?
If there was a positive note in IBM's quarter, it was perhaps the datum point that services signings jumped 44% this quarter to almost $17 billion. That's consistent with the results seen at Accenture (NYSE:ACN) and suggests that IBM is still in a good competitive position relative to the likes of Infosys (Nasdaq:INFY), Cognizant (Nasdaq:CTSH) and so on. It's worth mentioning again, though, that IBM is deliberately looking to turn away less desirable business in an effort to improve margins and returns, so the signings/revenue progression could still be a little lumpy (in addition to the “natural” lumpiness resulting from the economic environment).

SEE: A Primer On Investing In The Tech Industry

The Bottom Line
Even with IBM's stock down hard on this disappointing earnings report, it's not close to value territory for me. I believe that the company can continue to grow its free cash flow at a long-term rate close to 5%, but I wouldn't pay more than $180 for that growth right now. What's more, on a relative basis Oracle, Microsoft (Nasdaq:MSFT), and Cisco (Nasdaq:CSCO) all look cheaper than IBM today, leading me to wonder if investors are a little too enamored of buzzwords like “cloud” and “Big Data” when it comes to IBM.

At the time of writing, Stephen D. Simpson owned shares of EMC.

Related Articles
  1. Fundamental Analysis

    Ethical Investing Tutorial

    Learn everything there is to know about ethical investing.
  2. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    The Truth Behind Tactical ETF Investing

    Are tactical ETFs reasonable and effective investment strategies or just plain speculative behavior?
  3. Active Trading

    Value Investing

    Learn everything there is to know about value investing.
  4. Fundamental Analysis

    5 Must-Have Metrics For Value Investors

    Focusing on certain fundamental metrics is the best way for value investors to cash in gains. Here are the most important metrics to know.
  5. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  6. Investing

    What Investors Need to Know About Returns in 2016

    Last year wasn’t a great one for investors seeking solid returns, so here are three things we believe all investors need to know about returns in 2016.
  7. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  8. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  9. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  10. Stock Analysis

    The Top 5 Micro Cap Alternative Energy Stocks for 2016 (AMSC, SLTD)

    Follow a cautious approach when purchasing micro-cap stocks in the alternative energy sector. Learn about five alternative energy micro-caps worth considering.
RELATED FAQS
  1. What is Fibonacci retracement, and where do the ratios that are used come from?

    Fibonacci retracement is a very popular tool among technical traders and is based on the key numbers identified by mathematician ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the formula for calculating EBITDA?

    When analyzing financial fitness, corporate accountants and investors alike closely examine a company's financial statements ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How do I calculate the P/E ratio of a company?

    The price-earnings ratio (P/E ratio) is a valuation measure that compares the level of stock prices to the level of corporate ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How do you calculate return on equity (ROE)?

    Return on equity (ROE) is a ratio that provides investors insight into how efficiently a company (or more specifically, its ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. How do you calculate working capital?

    Working capital represents the difference between a firm’s current assets and current liabilities. The challenge can be determining ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the formula for calculating the current ratio?

    The current ratio is a financial ratio that investors and analysts use to examine the liquidity of a company and its ability ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center