The stocks of companies like Houston-based National Oilwell Varco, Inc. (NYSE:NOV) can be counterintuitive at times. It will often appear as though Wall Street obsesses over whatever a company doesn't have at the moment – if orders are good, the complaints are about margins; if margins are recovering, there are worries about orders tailing off.

In the case of National Oilwell Varco, the company seems to be on top of the production and margin challenges in its offshore business that are still troubling Cameron International Corp. (NYSE:CAM), but now investors worry about the health of the offshore rig order cycle. Land rig orders are looking better, though, and a greater than two-turn discount to Houston-based peers/competitors like Cameron, FMC Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:FTI), and Dril-Quip, Inc. (NYSE:DRQ) seems a little overdone.

No Other Vendor

Not many companies have the influence within their industries that National Oilwell Varco enjoys. About 90% of the world's drilling rigs have some NOV equipment on them and the company has 60-80% share in topside (machinery above ground or water level) packages for land and offshore rigs. From top drives and rotary equipment, to mud pumps, wireline equipment and downhole tools, National Oilwell Varco is a dominant force in the industry. Even companies like Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (NYSE:HP) that build their own rigs typically order substantial amounts of equipment from NOV. In only a few niches, like surface trees (an above-ground assembly of valves, spools and fittings) where Cameron is a share leader, does NOV not have a leadership position.

National Oilwell Varco isn't as dominant below the waterline, though it's still a significant business. NOV has around a 30-40% share in subsea equipment for floaters and jackups (types of oil rigs), trailing Cameron in both cases and competing with emerging rival General Electric Co. (NYSE:GE). NOV has been gaining share in the blowout preventer business, pulling ahead of companies like Cameron and GE in new orders.

Land Recovery and Growth in FPSOs

Investors definitely didn't like NOV's guidance on orders following first quarter earnings, with the implication of possibly no new-build floater orders in the second half of the year. NOV's facilities have been running all-out to keep up with orders, but now the fear is that weakness in dayrates (the rate a contractor is paid by an oil company or operator for running a rig) and delayed offshore projects are going to cut into rig orders.

That doesn't necessarily mean that NOV is going to run out of orders. While new orders did decline 23% year over year in the first quarter, orders for the North American land market saw an upturn. A large piece of the U.S. land rig fleet is 20 years old (or older) and not up to the task of efficiently drilling modern wells in unconventional shales. That ought to feed to a replacement/upgrade cycle that keeps orders coming in.

At the same time, while jackup and floater rig orders may be at or close to the peak for this cycle, there is still growth in floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) units. Through its acquisition of NKT Flexibles in 2012, NOV has increased its potential content per FPSO and now seriously rivals France's Technip S.A. in the market.

Can Management Rally the Troops?

In three months National Oilwell Varco has seen its coverage breakdown go from 24 buys, eight holds, and one sell to 19 buys, 11 holds, and one sell/reduce. Investors have also seen the company's multiple to forward EBITDA shrink into the high single-digits while Cameron, FMC Technologies, and Dril-Quip all enjoy double-digit multiples. Some of this can certainly be tied to different end-market exposures and different places in the cycle, but it's still an unusually large spread.

The Bottom Line

Even if National Oilwell Varco can't close the gap, an 8x multiple to 2014 EBITDA still suggests a fair value of nearly $89. That makes it an interesting relative value next to Cameron and FMC, though the former has a stronger self-improvement story right now and FMC is stronger in terms of near-term performance and orders. While this cycle is showing some gray hairs, NOV may yet have enough value to be worth a look in 2014 as the U.S. land market improves.

Disclosure: As of this writing, the author was long Cameron.

Related Articles
  1. Fundamental Analysis

    5 Biggest Risks Faced By Oil And Gas Companies

    Before investing in gas and oil stocks, consider such factors as political and geological risks.
  2. Investing

    5 Common Trading Multiples Used In Oil And Gas Valuation

    Before you decide to invest in oil and gas, you should understand these multiples.
  3. Forex Education

    A Primer On Offshore Drilling

    Learn the important ratios and terms that you'll need to know to get involved in this trading sector.
  4. Investing

    Can a Venezuela Revolt Impact Oil Prices?

    How a social crisis in Venezuela could affect West Texas Intermediate crude oil and Brent crude oil prices.
  5. Personal Finance

    A Day in the Life of an Equity Research Analyst

    What does an equity research analyst do on an everyday basis?
  6. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: PowerShares S&P 500 Downside Hedged

    Find out about the PowerShares S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF, and learn detailed information about characteristics, suitability and recommendations of it.
  7. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: iShares US Oil&Gas Explor&Prodtn

    Learn about the iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF, which provides an efficient way to invest in the exploration and production sector.
  8. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: ProShares Large Cap Core Plus

    Learn information about the ProShares Large Cap Core Plus ETF, and explore detailed analysis of its characteristics, suitability and recommendations.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: iShares Core Growth Allocation

    Find out about the iShares Core Growth Allocation Fund, and learn detailed information about its characteristics, suitability and recommendations.
  10. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility

    Learn about the iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility exchange-traded fund, which invests in low-volatility equities traded on the U.S. stock market.
RELATED TERMS
  1. Equity

    The value of an asset less the value of all liabilities on that ...
  2. P5+1

    The P5+1 is a group of world powers who have been negotiating ...
  3. Control Of Well Insurance

    Insurance that provides coverage to companies operating a well ...
  4. Hard-To-Sell Asset

    An asset that is extremely difficult to dispose of either due ...
  5. Sucker Yield

    When an investor has essentially risked all of his capital for ...
  6. 1979 energy crisis

    The 1979 energy crisis in the U.S. was an event of widespread ...
RELATED FAQS
  1. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What happens to the shares of stock purchased in a tender offer?

    The shares of stock purchased in a tender offer become the property of the purchaser. From that point forward, the purchaser, ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center
×

You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!