At the risk of sounding like I'm looking to bash Alcatel-Lucent (NYSE:ALU), I have been thinking more about the company's recently-announced restructuring efforts and wondering if they will help the company as much as they may help the company's rivals. The “law of unintended consequences” is real, and though there are sound motives for the company's moves, it nevertheless could backfire. To that end, I have to wonder if Ericsson (Nasdaq:ERIC) and Huawei are poised to reap the most benefit from Alcatel's self-improvement plans. SEE: Will A New Alcatel-Lucent Plan Lead To Better Results?The End Of “Soup To Nuts”It wasn't so long ago when equipment vendors thought there were significant advantages in being “end to end” vendors for telecom service providers – offering pretty much all of the equipment and services needed to build, operate, and maintain wireline and wireless networks. Given the bankruptcy of Nortel and the hardships seen by the likes of Alcatel, Ericsson, Nokia Siemens Networks, I'd say that being big wasn't any particular shield against hard times in the sector.Now that philosophy seems to be unraveling at least in part. Due in part to the fact that neither Nokia (NYSE:NOK) nor Siemens (NYSE:SI) could stomach the ongoing underperformance at NSN, the company concentrated its focus on mobile broadband, and has being doing much better since. Now Alcatel is looking to go the same way with a new focus on IP networking and broadband access, while selling off other businesses.This may well be a case of “easier said then done”, though. As was pointed out in an editorial in FierceBroadbandWireless, Alcatel tried to slim down its operations back in 2006, but customers rebelled. Alcatel ultimately decided that the customer(s) is always right and abandoned those plans, arguably to its own detriment. So will Alcatel management once again find that they are putting the company's market share in areas like CDMA, mobile backhaul, and/or optical at risk by winnowing out the less promising businesses?SEE: China Unicom Stands At NeutralDown To TwoAssuming that Alcatel-Lucent does go through with the restructuring as laid out this week, Ericsson and China's Huawei will be the only two end-to-end vendors left in the market. As mentioned before, NSN streamlined a little while ago, while ZTE lacks the service elements to go with its hardware. Then there are the various other players like Juniper (Nasdaq:JNPR), Cisco (Nasdaq:CSCO), and Ciena (Nasdaq:CIEN) that compete in particular segments of the market.All told, I wonder whether this ultimately benefits Ericsson the most, at least among carriers who feel as though they still need end-to-end vendors. With all of the concerns about spying from China, the North American and Western European markets have gotten less hospitable for Huawei and ZTE lately, leaving Ericsson as the potential beneficiary.It certainly doesn't hurt that Ericcson is the global leader in wireless market share (close to 40%), with particular strength in LTE and the U.S. While Alcatel has recently made some gains in CDMA, does any of that flow back to Ericsson with this restructuring? On the other hand, Ericsson isn't involved routing and switching or optics (but Huawei is), so there may only be just so many routes for business to flow away from Alcatel and toward Ericsson. Turbulence Usually Favors The LeadersUltimately, I do believe this restructuring is going to be good news for many of Alcatel's rivals. With management focused on selling assets, cutting costs (including firing workers), and perhaps preserving existing customer relationships, this opens an opportunity for Ciena, Cisco, Juniper, and Ericsson to aggressively target Alcatel accounts in optics, routing/switching, mobile packet core, and wireless.Along those lines, if there is still any validity left in the end-to-end vendor concept, it would seem that Alcatel-Lucent's efforts to restructure and refocus could ultimately be a boost to Ericsson's recovery plans. With Alcatel going into a significant restructuring just as demand for telecom equipment seems about to recover, this could be a good time for investors to once again consider the merits of Ericsson as an investment.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    3 Resilient Oil Stocks for a Down Market

    Stuck on oil? Take a look at these six stocks—three that present risk vs. three that offer some resiliency.
  2. Economics

    Keep an Eye on These Emerging Economies

    Emerging markets have been hammered lately, but these three countries (and their large and young populations) are worth monitoring.
  3. Stock Analysis

    Is Pepsi (PEP) Still a Safe Bet?

    PepsiCo has long been known as one of the most resilient stocks throughout the broader market. Is this still the case today?
  4. Investing

    The ABCs of Bond ETF Distributions

    How do bond exchange traded fund (ETF) distributions work? It’s a question I get a lot. First, let’s explain what we mean by distributions.
  5. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Top 4 Communications Mutual Funds

    Discover some of the best mutual funds in the communications sector, and learn how investors can position investments within these funds.
  6. Stock Analysis

    3 Stocks that Are Top Bets for Retirement

    These three stocks are resilient, fundamentally sound and also pay generous dividends.
  7. Investing News

    Are Stocks Cheap Now? Nope. And Here's Why

    Are stocks cheap right now? Be wary of those who are telling you what you want to hear. Here's why.
  8. Investing News

    4 Value Stocks Worth Your Immediate Attention

    Here are four stocks that offer good value and will likely outperform the majority of stocks throughout the broader market over the next several years.
  9. Investing News

    These 3 High-Quality Stocks Are Dividend Royalty

    Here are three resilient, dividend-paying companies that may mitigate some worry in an uncertain investing environment.
  10. Stock Analysis

    An Auto Stock Alternative to Ford and GM

    If you're not sure where Ford and General Motors are going, you might want to look at this auto investment option instead.
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!